Debates between Priti Patel and Yasmin Qureshi during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Priti Patel and Yasmin Qureshi
Tuesday 9th December 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Yasmin Qureshi Portrait Yasmin Qureshi (Bolton South East) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

13. How many employed people are in receipt of tax credits.

Priti Patel Portrait The Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury (Priti Patel)
- Hansard - -

Tax credits provide financial support to low-income households. In April 2014 there were 3.3 million families in work receiving tax credits. That had fallen from 4.8 million in April 2010. In total there are 4.7 million families receiving tax credits, 71% of whom are in work.

--- Later in debate ---
Priti Patel Portrait Priti Patel
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for his question. It is fair to say that this Government are not returning to the failed policies of the past as seen under the Labour party. The key measure explaining why we have had so much growth in our economy is our focus on our long-term economic plan, which is securing a better future for our economy, for the country and, of course, for hard-working taxpayers.

Yasmin Qureshi Portrait Yasmin Qureshi
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Thank you, Mr Speaker. Will the Minister confirm that 10 million households will be affected by the two-year freeze on tax credits and benefits and that the average household will be £974 worse off? This will hit working people the most, and women in particular, so will the Government reconsider their position?

Priti Patel Portrait Priti Patel
- Hansard - -

I come back to my earlier point about employment increasing and more women being in work than ever before. When it comes to tax credits, universal credit will go on to replace the current complex and broken system of means-tested benefits—introduced by the Labour party, by the way—and we are the party that has supported people to get into work and reduce dependency rather than confining them to dependency and welfare.