Information between 3rd November 2025 - 23rd November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Nov 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 80 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 150 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 153 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 155 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 152 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 151 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Supporting High Streets - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 321 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Polly Billington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Polly Billington speeches from: Business of the House
Polly Billington contributed 1 speech (101 words) Thursday 13th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Polly Billington speeches from: Supporting High Streets
Polly Billington contributed 5 speeches (987 words) Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
17th November 2025
Polly Billington (Labour - East Thanet) 4. Visits outside the UK International visit to Denmark between 23 October 2025 and 24 October 2025 Source |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
4 Nov 2025, 4:24 p.m. - House of Commons "better than that. Madam Deputy Speaker, Polly Billington. >> Very much, Madam Deputy Speaker. " Gregory Stafford MP (Farnham and Bordon, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
18 Nov 2025, 3:19 p.m. - House of Commons "Rachel Taylor. Matt Western and Polly Billington and myself. " Sonia Kumar MP (Dudley, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Unlocking community energy at scale At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Councillor Emily O'Brien - Climate Change Cabinet member at Lewes District Council and UK100 Climate Leadership Academy Graduate Tanuja Pandit - CEO at Power Up North London Eleanor Radcliffe - Project Manager, Energy Commons Team at Carbon Co-op At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Robbie Calvert - Head of Policy and Public Affairs at Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Dan Stone - Policy and Influencing Officer at Centre for Sustainable Energy Jenny Wigley, KC - Planning Barrister at Landmark Chambers View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Building support for the energy transition At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Emma Pinchbeck - Chief Executive at Climate Change Committee Professor Eric Wolff - Fellow at The Royal Society Professor Hugh Montgomery OBE - Director at Centre for Human Health and Performance, University College London View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The cost of energy At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Susie Elks - Senior Policy Advisor at E3G Tom Edwards - Principal Modeller at Cornwall Insight Professor Michael Grubb - Professor of Energy and Climate Change and Director of UCL Centre for Net Zero Market Design at UCL At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Ana Musat - Executive Director, Policy & Engagement at RenewableUK Tom Glover - UK Country Chair at RWE Adam Bell - Director of Policy at Stonehaven View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
5 Nov 2025
International climate policy Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2026) Ahead of COP 30, where host country Brazil’s Presidency has set a strategic goal to transition from “negotiation to implementation”, the Committee is launching a call for evidence in a major new inquiry on UK climate policy and finance. Climate change is a global problem that requires a global response. The world is now experiencing the increasingly severe impacts of a rapidly heating climate with intense wildfires, severe droughts, and heavy rainfall leading to destructive floods more frequently and over a wider range. The 2015 Paris Agreement represented a significant moment of international coordination to reduce emissions and to adapt to climate change. But the UN recently announced that global action has failed to limit global heating to the 1.5 degrees agreed there. In 2022, the IPCC warned that “any further delay in concerted global action will miss a brief and rapidly closing window to secure a liveable future”. The UK became the first country in the world to make a legally-binding national commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions in The Climate Change Act 2008. In 2019 the UK was the first major economy to enshrine its commitment to Net Zero by 2050 in law. At COP 29 in Baku last year, the agreed target for climate finance flowing to developing countries was increased from $100 billion to at least $300 billion a year by 2035, with an aspiration for that to hit $1.3 trillion per year over the same period, in recognition of the scale of the challenge. And in 2022, the latest data available, developed countries delivered around $116 billion – over that target - to developing countries for climate action. But the global political consensus on climate change, the financial sector’s commitment to action on climate and climate diplomacy have all been impacted by tensions and transformations in the global order. The UK Government has stated “there is no global stability without climate stability”, that the UK “must play its part by resetting at home and reconnecting abroad”, and has placed an emphasis on re-establishing the UK “as a climate leader on the global stage”. It committed to meet the previous Government’s pledge of providing £11.6 billion in international climate finance between 2021 and 2026 - but beyond March 2026 the approach is unclear. Through this inquiry, the Committee intends to investigate how the Government can best demonstrate international leadership on climate policy. |
|
17 Jul 2025
Planning for nuclear energy generation Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The UK is embarking on an ambitious programme of investment in nuclear energy, seeking to reverse decades of declining capacity. The Government is counting on new nuclear to help deliver energy security and decarbonise electricity generation. Announcing funding for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in June, the Energy Secretary said “we need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance.” But past promises of a golden age of nuclear energy have so far failed to materialise. A new reactor has not been connected to the grid for 30 years. Nuclear projects have historically faced unique barriers, including complex regulatory and planning processes. The Government now aims to deliver reforms to streamline planning approvals and give greater certainty to developers. Consultation and scrutiny of EN-7The National Policy Statement for Nuclear Energy Generation (EN-7) has been put forward to help guide planners as they seek to make decisions on siting new nuclear infrastructure. Under the Planning Act 2008, a National Policy Statement (NPS) like EN-7 must undergo public consultation and parliamentary scrutiny before it can be formally designated. EN-7 has undergone two rounds of consultation: the first focused on potential changes to the nuclear siting approach; the second introduced the full draft text. The Committee is now beginning the parliamentary scrutiny process, offering MPs the opportunity to hear from industry, experts, and the public to examine the implications of the framework set out in EN-7 in detail. What is EN-7?EN-7 is intended to become the principal guide for decisions on future nuclear power stations in England and Wales. Nuclear infrastructure proposals are currently limited to eight sites in England and Wales. EN-7 replaces this with a criteria-based approach. It is also intended to support development of a broader range of nuclear technologies like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), as well as traditional gigawatt-scale plants. The aim is to create a future-proof planning framework that enables a pipeline of new nuclear projects to come forward. Call for EvidenceThe Energy Security and Net Zero Committee is now inviting written submissions to help assess whether EN-7 provides a coherent and effective framework for enabling the UK’s nuclear ambitions. |