Planning and Infrastructure Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Wilson of Sedgefield
Main Page: Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Wilson of Sedgefield's debates with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
(1 day, 11 hours ago)
Lords ChamberMy Lords, before we start the first group, I remind the House, as I did last week, of important guidance on Report, which will, I hope, help proceedings run smoothly.
First, I note paragraph 4.23 of the Companion, which states:
“Debate must be relevant to the Question before the House”.
While debates on the Bill have been important and no doubt interesting, a number of earlier contributions strayed into wider topics not directly relevant to the amendments in the group being debated. I urge all colleagues to follow this guidance so that we can maintain effective scrutiny, while allowing us to make good progress in good time.
Secondly, I remind noble Lords of the Companion guidance in paragraph 8.82:
“Members … pressing or withdrawing an amendment should normally be brief and need not respond to all the points made during the debate, nor revisit points made when moving”
or pressing an amendment. Speeches appear to be getting longer, and if noble Lords were to follow this guidance closely, we would be able to get on in a more timely manner.
Before the noble Lord sits down, can I clarify that 67 government amendments, I think, came in very late to the Bill? They have therefore not had a Committee stage. I hope he and the Minister will accept that some of those will need Committee, as well as Report, discussions.
It is Report and all I would say is that, as long as the debate is relevant, we have no problem with that.
Amendment 84
My Lords, this amendment was debated last week, but I would like to remind the House what it was about. Basically, it is about not losing—[Interruption.] Am I not allowed to say that? The Whip is shaking his head at me. I will rattle on until he stands up and shouts. In essence, this is about the recovery of storm-water, surface water and flood-water that otherwise rushes into our systems and is then totally gone. What we could do is catch that water and use it—instead of using extremely expensive tap-water—to wash cars, fill up paddling pools and so on.
I say to the noble Baroness that we debated this amendment last week. The Front Bench does not have the right of reply at this stage. We ask her whether she is pushing the amendment to a vote or withdrawing.
I thank the noble Lord the Whip. I would like to test the opinion of the House on this incredibly important issue.