Information between 28th October 2024 - 7th November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 359 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 373 Noes - 110 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 362 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 450 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 383 Noes - 184 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 368 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 455 Noes - 125 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 371 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 360 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 378 Noes - 116 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 454 Noes - 124 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 367 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 122 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 368 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 120 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 111 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 361 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 353 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Peter Prinsley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 345 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 361 |
Speeches |
---|
Peter Prinsley speeches from: Income Tax (Charge)
Peter Prinsley contributed 1 speech (446 words) Tuesday 5th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
Peter Prinsley speeches from: Israel: UNRWA Ban
Peter Prinsley contributed 1 speech (52 words) Tuesday 29th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for International Development |
Written Answers |
---|
East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust: Staff
Asked by: Peter Prinsley (Labour - Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket) Wednesday 30th October 2024 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the impact of plans to outsource hundreds of staff by East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust on (a) NHS services and the (b) healthcare workforce. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Contract award decisions in the National Health Service fall directly to individual NHS bodies, which are responsible for running their own procurement exercises. Ministers do not have general powers in legislation to direct NHS trusts in relation to the exercise of any of their functions, including in relation to specific contractual decisions. The NHS has established governance processes, in line with Government procurement policy and best practice, to assure that appropriate contractual decisions are made and represent value for money. East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust has advised the Department and NHS England that no final decision has been taken yet for the future provision of ‘Soft’ Facilities Management services across the trust’s sites. Staff and their Union representatives affected by the proposals have been fully consulted as the trust has progressed its plans. All the options in a formal Full Business Case (FBC) will be considered, following receipt and evaluation of bids received from potential external suppliers. The trust is not obliged to accept any of the bids submitted unless they clearly demonstrate value for money and deliver against the aims and objectives of the business cases. |
Physician Associates
Asked by: Peter Prinsley (Labour - Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to (a) bring forward legislative proposals to further regulate and (b) publish guidance on the (i) definition of the scope of practice and (ii) supervisory requirements for physician associates. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The legislation to introduce statutory regulation for Physician Associates (PAs) and Anaesthesia Associates (AAs) was debated in the Scottish Parliament and both Houses of Parliament earlier this year. Regulation by the General Medical Council (GMC) will begin in December 2024. The GMC will set standards of practice, education, and training, and will operate fitness-to-practice procedures to ensure that PAs and AAs can be held to account if serious concerns are raised. Whilst statutory regulation is an important part of ensuring patient safety, it is also achieved through robust clinical governance processes within healthcare organisations, which are required to have systems of oversight and supervision for their staff. NHS England has issued clear guidance on the deployment of PAs and AAs in the National Health Service, which describes the expectations of how organisations providing NHS care should deploy them so that they can contribute to the delivery of safe and effective healthcare in a supportive environment. This guidance is available at the following link: |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Income Tax (Charge)
289 speeches (53,735 words) Tuesday 5th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Nusrat Ghani (Con - Sussex Weald) I call Dr Peter Prinsley. - Link to Speech |