Information between 24th March 2025 - 23rd April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 303 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 304 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 307 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 137 Noes - 304 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 41 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 62 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 306 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 305 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 170 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 302 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 167 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 167 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 104 |
31 Mar 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 164 |
24 Mar 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 74 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 192 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 190 |
25 Mar 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 198 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 166 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 180 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 179 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 180 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 194 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 183 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 117 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 196 |
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 110 |
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 110 Noes - 302 |
2 Apr 2025 - Driving Licences: Zero Emission Vehicles - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 101 |
2 Apr 2025 - Onshore Wind and Solar Generation - View Vote Context Paulette Hamilton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 100 |
Speeches |
---|
Paulette Hamilton speeches from: Birmingham City Council
Paulette Hamilton contributed 1 speech (55 words) Monday 31st March 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
Paulette Hamilton speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Paulette Hamilton contributed 2 speeches (59 words) Tuesday 25th March 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
Written Answers | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Windrush Generation: Advocacy
Asked by: Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) Monday 24th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the eligibility criteria will be for the Windrush advocacy support fund; and whether Windrush groups providing advocacy will be able to apply. Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) This Government is determined to put right the appalling injustices caused by the Home Office’s treatment of members of the Windrush community, making sure that those affected receive the compensation they deserve quickly, and ensuring cultural change is embedded permanently into the fabric of the department. The new Windrush Unit in the Home Office is undertaking a careful and detailed review of all 30 recommendations in the Windrush Lessons Learned Review to assess how far the department has come and identify those recommendations which require more work. We recognise that people have waited far too long for action, and we are making progress to put things right. Recruitment for the Windrush Commissioner has closed and the successful candidate will be in post by the summer. Once appointed, the Commissioner will advise on the Home Office’s response to the Windrush Lessons Learned Review, driving improvements and promoting lasting change across the whole Department. The Commissioner will also assure the Home Office’s delivery of the Windrush Compensation Scheme, providing advice to Ministers on the scheme’s effectiveness in achieving its objectives. In the interim, the Government is working to ensure that Windrush victims and their families get the maximum support and compensation they are entitled to quickly and efficiently, as we promised in our manifesto. The Windrush Compensation Scheme has been designed to be as simple as possible to access, and existing caselaw has underlined that while the application process can be emotionally complex, individuals are not required to argue complex points of law. It is not therefore our intention to introduce legal aid support for individuals to complete their claims. Nevertheless, we have recognised the need for additional advocacy support, we are working at pace to develop a program of £1.5 million grant funding for organisations to provide advocacy and support with the application process. This assistance will be offered alongside - but separate from - existing claims support, so that potential claimants have maximum flexibility and choice regarding the type of help they want and where they can access it. This is designed to make the prospect of making a claim more accessible for each person, keeping the needs of the individual at the heart of everything we do and keeping our support programmes under review. We also continue to engage with community representatives and victims to ensure their voices are heard in this area. So far, officials have spoken with and listened to over 30 stakeholders, advocates and community representatives to inform the structure of the advocacy support fund. |
||||||||||||
Windrush Lessons Learned Review
Asked by: Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) Monday 24th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what her planned timeline is for the implementation of the Windrush lessons learned review recommendations. Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) This Government is determined to put right the appalling injustices caused by the Home Office’s treatment of members of the Windrush community, making sure that those affected receive the compensation they deserve quickly, and ensuring cultural change is embedded permanently into the fabric of the department. The new Windrush Unit in the Home Office is undertaking a careful and detailed review of all 30 recommendations in the Windrush Lessons Learned Review to assess how far the department has come and identify those recommendations which require more work. We recognise that people have waited far too long for action, and we are making progress to put things right. Recruitment for the Windrush Commissioner has closed and the successful candidate will be in post by the summer. Once appointed, the Commissioner will advise on the Home Office’s response to the Windrush Lessons Learned Review, driving improvements and promoting lasting change across the whole Department. The Commissioner will also assure the Home Office’s delivery of the Windrush Compensation Scheme, providing advice to Ministers on the scheme’s effectiveness in achieving its objectives. In the interim, the Government is working to ensure that Windrush victims and their families get the maximum support and compensation they are entitled to quickly and efficiently, as we promised in our manifesto. The Windrush Compensation Scheme has been designed to be as simple as possible to access, and existing caselaw has underlined that while the application process can be emotionally complex, individuals are not required to argue complex points of law. It is not therefore our intention to introduce legal aid support for individuals to complete their claims. Nevertheless, we have recognised the need for additional advocacy support, we are working at pace to develop a program of £1.5 million grant funding for organisations to provide advocacy and support with the application process. This assistance will be offered alongside - but separate from - existing claims support, so that potential claimants have maximum flexibility and choice regarding the type of help they want and where they can access it. This is designed to make the prospect of making a claim more accessible for each person, keeping the needs of the individual at the heart of everything we do and keeping our support programmes under review. We also continue to engage with community representatives and victims to ensure their voices are heard in this area. So far, officials have spoken with and listened to over 30 stakeholders, advocates and community representatives to inform the structure of the advocacy support fund. |
||||||||||||
Windrush Compensation Scheme
Asked by: Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) Monday 24th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of (a) increasing the level of legal aid provision and (b) providing alternative funding for legal representation to support Windrush compensation claimants; and if she will make a comparative assessment of the level of funding available to support applicants to the (i) Infected Blood Compensation, (ii) Horizon Convictions Redress and (iii) Windrush Compensation Schemes. Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) This Government is determined to put right the appalling injustices caused by the Home Office’s treatment of members of the Windrush community, making sure that those affected receive the compensation they deserve quickly, and ensuring cultural change is embedded permanently into the fabric of the department. The new Windrush Unit in the Home Office is undertaking a careful and detailed review of all 30 recommendations in the Windrush Lessons Learned Review to assess how far the department has come and identify those recommendations which require more work. We recognise that people have waited far too long for action, and we are making progress to put things right. Recruitment for the Windrush Commissioner has closed and the successful candidate will be in post by the summer. Once appointed, the Commissioner will advise on the Home Office’s response to the Windrush Lessons Learned Review, driving improvements and promoting lasting change across the whole Department. The Commissioner will also assure the Home Office’s delivery of the Windrush Compensation Scheme, providing advice to Ministers on the scheme’s effectiveness in achieving its objectives. In the interim, the Government is working to ensure that Windrush victims and their families get the maximum support and compensation they are entitled to quickly and efficiently, as we promised in our manifesto. The Windrush Compensation Scheme has been designed to be as simple as possible to access, and existing caselaw has underlined that while the application process can be emotionally complex, individuals are not required to argue complex points of law. It is not therefore our intention to introduce legal aid support for individuals to complete their claims. Nevertheless, we have recognised the need for additional advocacy support, we are working at pace to develop a program of £1.5 million grant funding for organisations to provide advocacy and support with the application process. This assistance will be offered alongside - but separate from - existing claims support, so that potential claimants have maximum flexibility and choice regarding the type of help they want and where they can access it. This is designed to make the prospect of making a claim more accessible for each person, keeping the needs of the individual at the heart of everything we do and keeping our support programmes under review. We also continue to engage with community representatives and victims to ensure their voices are heard in this area. So far, officials have spoken with and listened to over 30 stakeholders, advocates and community representatives to inform the structure of the advocacy support fund. |
||||||||||||
Windrush Compensation Scheme
Asked by: Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) Monday 24th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what her planned timeline is for the review of the Windrush compensation scheme. Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) This Government is determined to put right the appalling injustices caused by the Home Office’s treatment of members of the Windrush community, making sure that those affected receive the compensation they deserve quickly, and ensuring cultural change is embedded permanently into the fabric of the department. The new Windrush Unit in the Home Office is undertaking a careful and detailed review of all 30 recommendations in the Windrush Lessons Learned Review to assess how far the department has come and identify those recommendations which require more work. We recognise that people have waited far too long for action, and we are making progress to put things right. Recruitment for the Windrush Commissioner has closed and the successful candidate will be in post by the summer. Once appointed, the Commissioner will advise on the Home Office’s response to the Windrush Lessons Learned Review, driving improvements and promoting lasting change across the whole Department. The Commissioner will also assure the Home Office’s delivery of the Windrush Compensation Scheme, providing advice to Ministers on the scheme’s effectiveness in achieving its objectives. In the interim, the Government is working to ensure that Windrush victims and their families get the maximum support and compensation they are entitled to quickly and efficiently, as we promised in our manifesto. The Windrush Compensation Scheme has been designed to be as simple as possible to access, and existing caselaw has underlined that while the application process can be emotionally complex, individuals are not required to argue complex points of law. It is not therefore our intention to introduce legal aid support for individuals to complete their claims. Nevertheless, we have recognised the need for additional advocacy support, we are working at pace to develop a program of £1.5 million grant funding for organisations to provide advocacy and support with the application process. This assistance will be offered alongside - but separate from - existing claims support, so that potential claimants have maximum flexibility and choice regarding the type of help they want and where they can access it. This is designed to make the prospect of making a claim more accessible for each person, keeping the needs of the individual at the heart of everything we do and keeping our support programmes under review. We also continue to engage with community representatives and victims to ensure their voices are heard in this area. So far, officials have spoken with and listened to over 30 stakeholders, advocates and community representatives to inform the structure of the advocacy support fund. |
||||||||||||
Universal Credit: Death
Asked by: Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) Monday 7th April 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people receiving Universal Credit assessed as having Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity died (a) in total and (b) under the Special Rules for Terminal Illness in the last year for which information is available. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Department supports people nearing the end of life through special benefit rules – called the Special Rules for End of Life (SREL). These enable people who are nearing the end of their lives to get faster, easier access to certain benefits, without needing to attend a medical assessment, serve waiting periods and in most cases, receive the highest rate of benefit.
This table shows the total number of Universal Credit claimants who had a Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) award during 2024 broken down by the number with a LCWRA award under SREL and the number who died during the year.
Notes: Numbers are rounded to 100. Data is taken from Universal Credit analytical systems but results have not been quality assured to Official Statistics publication standard and are subject to retrospective change. |
||||||||||||
Personal Independence Payment: Death
Asked by: Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) Monday 7th April 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many claims for Personal Independence Payment were stopped due to the death of the claimant where they received a Daily Living component but less than four points for each Daily Living activity in their last assessment in the last year for which information is available. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) This information is not readily available.
Information on the impacts of the Pathways to Work Green Paper will be published in due course, and some information was published alongside the Spring Statement. These publications can be found in ‘Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper’.
A further programme of analysis to support development of the proposals in the Green Paper will be developed and undertaken in the coming months. |
||||||||||||
Personal Independence Payment: Death
Asked by: Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) Monday 7th April 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people died who had been assessed as having Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity under the Normal Rules and received a Daily Living component of Personal Independence Payment but received less than four points for each Daily Living activity in their last assessment in the last year for which information is available. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) This information is not readily available.
Information on the impacts of the Pathways to Work Green Paper will be published in due course, and some information was published alongside the Spring Statement. These publications can be found in ‘Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper’.
A further programme of analysis to support development of the proposals in the Green Paper will be developed and undertaken in the coming months. |
MP Financial Interests |
---|
24th March 2025
Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 28 February 2025 - £159.20 Source |
7th April 2025
Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 21 March 2025 - £300.00 Source |
7th April 2025
Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 26 July 2024 - £150.00 Source |
7th April 2025
Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 28 March 2025 - £111.20 Source |
7th April 2025
Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) 1. Employment and earnings Jeremy Vine guest reviewer on the breakfast program, discussing current news affairs of the day. - ITN Productions Source |
7th April 2025
Paulette Hamilton (Labour - Birmingham Erdington) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 07 February 2025 - £300.00 Source |
Early Day Motions Signed |
---|
Tuesday 6th May Paulette Hamilton signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 6th May 2025 Legal protection of the nurse job title 7 signatures (Most recent: 6 May 2025)Tabled by: Dawn Butler (Labour - Brent East) That this House notes with concern that the job title of nurse is not currently a legally protected term, despite the high levels of public trust placed in the profession; further notes that, while the title of registered nurse is protected, the widespread and unregulated use of the term nurse … |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Birmingham City Council
29 speeches (5,595 words) Monday 31st March 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Vikki Slade (LD - Mid Dorset and North Poole) Member for Birmingham Erdington (Paulette Hamilton), we are concerned about the impact on public health - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Wednesday 16th April 2025
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes 2024-25 Health and Social Care Committee Found: Ben Coleman Dr Beccy Cooper Deirdre Costigan Jen Craft Josh Fenton-Glynn Andrew George Paulette Hamilton |
Wednesday 2nd April 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-04-02 09:30:00+01:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: We now go to Paulette Hamilton. Q12 Paulette Hamilton: Thank you for coming this morning. |
Wednesday 2nd April 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-04-02 09:30:00+01:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: We now go to Paulette Hamilton. Q12 Paulette Hamilton: Thank you for coming this morning. |
Wednesday 2nd April 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-04-02 09:30:00+01:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: We now go to Paulette Hamilton. Q12 Paulette Hamilton: Thank you for coming this morning. |
Tuesday 1st April 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-04-01 16:15:00+01:00 Proposals for backbench debates - Backbench Business Committee Found: Questions 1-11 Witnesses I: Paulette Hamilton. II: Andrew Ranger. III: Sam Rushworth. |
Tuesday 1st April 2025
Oral Evidence - Robert Halfon, former Member of Parliament, Sarah Bool MP, Steve Darling MP, Dr Marie Tidball MP, and Marsha De Cordova MP Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures - Modernisation Committee Found: ); Markus Campbell-Savours; Wendy Chamberlain; Sarah Coombes; Chris Elmore; Marie Goldman; Paulette Hamilton |
Tuesday 1st April 2025
Oral Evidence - Robert Halfon, former Member of Parliament, Sarah Bool MP, Steve Darling MP, Dr Marie Tidball MP, and Marsha De Cordova MP Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures - Modernisation Committee Found: ); Markus Campbell-Savours; Wendy Chamberlain; Sarah Coombes; Chris Elmore; Marie Goldman; Paulette Hamilton |
Wednesday 26th March 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-03-26 09:30:00+00:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: ); Danny Beales; Ben Coleman; Dr Beccy Cooper; Jen Craft; Josh Fenton-Glynn; Andrew George; Paulette Hamilton |
Wednesday 26th March 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-03-26 09:30:00+00:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: ); Danny Beales; Ben Coleman; Dr Beccy Cooper; Jen Craft; Josh Fenton-Glynn; Andrew George; Paulette Hamilton |
Wednesday 19th March 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-03-19 09:30:00+00:00 Adult Social Care Reform: The Cost of Inaction - Health and Social Care Committee Found: Q225 Paulette Hamilton: My next question follows on quite easily. |
Bill Documents |
---|
Apr. 22 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 22 April 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: ” _21 Munira Wilson Paulette Hamilton Jess Asato . |
Apr. 09 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 9 April 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _21 Munira Wilson Paulette Hamilton ★. |
Mar. 26 2025
Bill 182 2024-25 (as introduced) Nurse (Use of Title) Bill 2024-26 Bill Found: Presented by Dawn Butler supported by Paulette Hamilton, Tulip Siddiq, Mrs Sharon Hodgson, Barry Gardiner |
Mar. 25 2025
All proceedings up to 25 March 2025 at Public Bill Committee Stage Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Not called_96 Mr James Cleverly Antonia Bance Paulette Hamilton Danny Kruger Ms Diane Abbott Sir |
Mar. 25 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 25 March 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _100 Mr James Cleverly Antonia Bance Paulette Hamilton Danny Kruger Ms Diane Abbott Sir Julian |