Children with SEND: Assessments and Support
Paulette Hamilton Excerpts(2 days ago)
Westminster HallRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.
Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.
This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record
Paulette Hamilton (Birmingham Erdington) (Lab)
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dr Huq. I thank the hon. Member for South Cotswolds (Dr Savage) for leading this important debate and the 163 people in the Birmingham Erdington constituency who signed the petition. Their voices make it clear that SEND provision is a pressing priority in our community.
SEND provision is a daily reality in the Birmingham area. More than 17% of our pupils receive SEND support, and we are proud to be the home of seven special schools, with many more offering SEND provision, so the issue of SEND reform affects thousands of families in my area. I wrote to more than 40 schools in my area earlier this month, and I visited Hawthorn primary school in Kingstanding. The dedicated staff made three issues crystal clear to me: they face a funding crisis, there is a dire need for extra places at special schools, and specialist support in mainstream settings is, in their words, “patchy at best”.
[Dr Rosena Allin-Khan in the Chair]
That story was repeated across my constituency. People described a process that is failing families. They spend three years or more on a waiting list, followed by the 20-week wait for an EHCP—a deadline that the local authority constantly misses. The Public Accounts Committee warned that the SEND system is arguably already at “crisis point”. Despite extra funding being provided, councils face a projected deficit of more than £8 billion by 2027. We all know that the system must be reformed, but that must not come at the cost of removing children’s right to learn, thrive and live their lives to the fullest.
For children who can thrive in mainstream schools, we must guarantee the support and staffing that make inclusion a reality, not just a promise. We cannot afford more delays. We cannot afford more uncertainty. Let this debate be the moment that we take a stand a build a SEND system that works for every child.
SEND Funding
Paulette Hamilton Excerpts(3 months ago)
Commons ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Graham Stuart
As usual, the hon. Gentleman hits the nail on the head.
Many across this House will recognise the stories of the schools I have just mentioned, because the same thing is playing out in constituencies across the country. Parents are becoming de facto care co-ordinators; schools are dipping into ever-shrinking budgets to fund specialist provision; and local authorities are caught between legal responsibilities and budgetary reality.
Paulette Hamilton (Birmingham Erdington) (Lab)
I was contacted by a parent in my constituency who was forced to navigate a complex and lengthy tribunal process simply to challenge the decision to place her autistic son in a mainstream school, only to have the hearing cancelled at the last moment, and a place at a special school offered. Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that education, health and care plans are not a silver bullet, that we should not need complex legal processes to ensure that young people can access good early support, that support must meet the young person’s needs, and that the money must follow the child or young person?
Graham Stuart
The hon. Lady is absolutely right. I was chairing the Education Committee when the coalition Government introduced the reforms that brought in EHCPs as a replacement for statements. I remember thinking then that lots of good improvements were made—there were very sincere Ministers working hard at it, and they brought in a better system—but the fundamentals remained as they were. One of the aims was to get away from an adversarial, legalistic process, in which articulate and typically better-off people were able to use sharp elbows to get their child what they needed, but pity the inarticulate single mother unable to engage with the system. What would she get? The then Government’s promise was to make that better, but the fundamentals remained.
If demand is so much bigger than supply, this is what we will get. With the best will in the world, local authorities will end up being defensive and saying no as a matter of course, and will give way only when they are forced to. Am I going on too long, Madam Deputy Speaker?
Home-to-School Transport: Children with SEND
Paulette Hamilton Excerpts(9 months, 2 weeks ago)
Westminster HallRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.
Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.
This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record
Paulette Hamilton (Birmingham Erdington) (Lab)
I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Thurrock (Jen Craft) for securing this important debate. Many parents and children in my constituency are deeply frustrated because of the cuts we have seen to school transport. The situation has gone from cuts to the over-16s now getting nothing. One mother said to me that her son, a boy with Down’s syndrome, was actually forced to stay at home because he could no longer get the support he needed for transport.
Transport should never be a barrier to education. I welcome the Government’s pledge of a £1 billion investment, but I ask that the funding is delivered swiftly and effectively to address the urgent needs of families and those in the community. Those families deserve the dignity, support and access to education that every child has a right to.