Information between 1st March 2025 - 11th March 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Paul Kohler voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 60 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 339 Noes - 172 |
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Paul Kohler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 347 |
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Paul Kohler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 332 |
Speeches |
---|
Paul Kohler speeches from: Political Finance Rules
Paul Kohler contributed 1 speech (746 words) Thursday 6th March 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
Paul Kohler speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Paul Kohler contributed 2 speeches (128 words) Monday 3rd March 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
Paul Kohler speeches from: Finance Bill
Paul Kohler contributed 2 speeches (1,127 words) Report stage Monday 3rd March 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
Written Answers |
---|
Heathrow Airport: Construction
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Tuesday 11th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has developed contingency plans to respond to potential legal challenges to the proposed expansion to Heathrow airport. Answered by Mike Kane - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government will take all necessary and appropriate actions to ensure a sound legal basis for its decisions.
|
Cycleways and Public Footpaths: Construction
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Thursday 6th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions she has had with (a) statistical and (b) land registry authorities on the availability of land for use as public (i) walkways and (ii) cycleways. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Secretary of State has not had any such discussions. It is a matter for individual local authorities to establish what land is available in their areas for public walkways and cycleways. |
Cycleways and Rights of Way: Construction
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Thursday 6th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many additional miles of (a) public footpaths, (b) bridleways, (c) restricted byways and (d) other public walkways and cycleways her Department plans to deliver by 2030. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government recognises that investment in high quality active travel infrastructure delivers high value for money and supports its economic growth, health and net zero missions. Encouraging more active travel helps to revitalise high streets, enable people to live longer and healthier lives and helps to reduce transport emissions and to promote greener journeys.
On 12 February, the Department announced the details of almost £300 million of funding for active travel in 2024/5 and 2025/6, which will deliver 300 miles of brand-new footpaths and cycle tracks. Total estimated benefits of this investment are £1.3 billion, including £9 million every year to the economy through improved productivity, equivalent to 43,000 fewer sick days a year, by making it easier to walk and cycle to work and for everyday journeys.
Beyond the funding announced by the Department on 12 February, any further mileage for active travel routes, delivered up until 2030, will be dependent on the outcome of the Spending Review.
Local authorities are empowered to decide where investment is made in their areas. As such, it is for local authorities to consider whether disused railway lines in their areas would be suitable for active travel routes and to work with National Highways, in their role as custodians of the Historical Railways Estate, to assess the viability of any particular routes.
|
Cycleways and Public Footpaths: Construction
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Thursday 6th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an estimate of the number of miles of disused rail lines that could be developed into (a) cycleways and (b) walkways. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government recognises that investment in high quality active travel infrastructure delivers high value for money and supports its economic growth, health and net zero missions. Encouraging more active travel helps to revitalise high streets, enable people to live longer and healthier lives and helps to reduce transport emissions and to promote greener journeys.
On 12 February, the Department announced the details of almost £300 million of funding for active travel in 2024/5 and 2025/6, which will deliver 300 miles of brand-new footpaths and cycle tracks. Total estimated benefits of this investment are £1.3 billion, including £9 million every year to the economy through improved productivity, equivalent to 43,000 fewer sick days a year, by making it easier to walk and cycle to work and for everyday journeys.
Beyond the funding announced by the Department on 12 February, any further mileage for active travel routes, delivered up until 2030, will be dependent on the outcome of the Spending Review.
Local authorities are empowered to decide where investment is made in their areas. As such, it is for local authorities to consider whether disused railway lines in their areas would be suitable for active travel routes and to work with National Highways, in their role as custodians of the Historical Railways Estate, to assess the viability of any particular routes.
|
Cycleways and Public Footpaths: Economic Situation
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Thursday 6th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of dedicated (a) cycleways and (b) walkways on the economy. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government recognises that investment in high quality active travel infrastructure delivers high value for money and supports its economic growth, health and net zero missions. Encouraging more active travel helps to revitalise high streets, enable people to live longer and healthier lives and helps to reduce transport emissions and to promote greener journeys.
On 12 February, the Department announced the details of almost £300 million of funding for active travel in 2024/5 and 2025/6, which will deliver 300 miles of brand-new footpaths and cycle tracks. Total estimated benefits of this investment are £1.3 billion, including £9 million every year to the economy through improved productivity, equivalent to 43,000 fewer sick days a year, by making it easier to walk and cycle to work and for everyday journeys.
Beyond the funding announced by the Department on 12 February, any further mileage for active travel routes, delivered up until 2030, will be dependent on the outcome of the Spending Review.
Local authorities are empowered to decide where investment is made in their areas. As such, it is for local authorities to consider whether disused railway lines in their areas would be suitable for active travel routes and to work with National Highways, in their role as custodians of the Historical Railways Estate, to assess the viability of any particular routes.
|
Cycleways and Public Footpaths: Public Health
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Thursday 6th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of dedicated (a) cycleways and (b) walkways on public health. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government recognises that investment in high quality active travel infrastructure delivers high value for money and supports its economic growth, health and net zero missions. Encouraging more active travel helps to revitalise high streets, enable people to live longer and healthier lives and helps to reduce transport emissions and to promote greener journeys.
On 12 February, the Department announced the details of almost £300 million of funding for active travel in 2024/5 and 2025/6, which will deliver 300 miles of brand-new footpaths and cycle tracks. Total estimated benefits of this investment are £1.3 billion, including £9 million every year to the economy through improved productivity, equivalent to 43,000 fewer sick days a year, by making it easier to walk and cycle to work and for everyday journeys.
Beyond the funding announced by the Department on 12 February, any further mileage for active travel routes, delivered up until 2030, will be dependent on the outcome of the Spending Review.
Local authorities are empowered to decide where investment is made in their areas. As such, it is for local authorities to consider whether disused railway lines in their areas would be suitable for active travel routes and to work with National Highways, in their role as custodians of the Historical Railways Estate, to assess the viability of any particular routes.
|
Asylum: Hotels
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Thursday 6th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to Q52 of the oral evidence given by the Permanent Secretary to the Home Affairs Select Committee on 4 February 2025 HC 505, how many (a) rooms and (b) rooms were the ten hotels in question able to accommodate; and what the saving to the public purse will be as a result of their closure. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office publishes numbers on people in hotels. It does not publish or report on number of rooms. Data on the number of supported asylum seekers in accommodation, including hotels, and by local authority can be found on GOV.UK as part of the quarterly Immigration system statistics release. The Home Office also publishes information on asylum expenditure in the Home Office Annual Report and Accounts. |
Police: Recruitment
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Friday 7th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to Q32 of the oral evidence given by the Permanent Secretary to the Home Affairs Select Committee on 4 February 2025 HC 505, if she will (a) provide a detailed cost matrix for each role within the police and (b) set out how announced Government funding will support the recruitment of new officers. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) Total funding to police forces will be up to £17.5 billion, an increase of up to £1.1 billion compared to the 2024-25 police funding settlement. This includes fully covering the costs for the pay award, the increase in the employer national contributions, funding for officer maintenance and an additional £200 million to kickstart the first phase of recruitment for 13,000 additional police officers and PCSOs into neighbourhood policing roles. For neighbourhood roles in 2025-26 we have asked forces to outline proposals for their workforce mix that is tailored to local needs and operational contexts, based on what is deliverable within their funding allocation. This will ensure that additional neighbourhood personnel in 2025-26 are delivered in a manner that is flexible and easily adaptable to varied crime demands, allowing forces to increase the neighbourhood policing workforce at pace. |
Demonstrations and Offences against Children
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Friday 7th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to Q16 of the oral evidence given by the Permanent Secretary to the Home Affairs Select Committee on 4 February 2025 HC 505, whether her Department has conducted horizon scanning on (a) spontaneous far-right protests and (b) child sexual exploitation by organised networks. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The Home Office and our policing partners keep all risks of criminality under review on an ongoing basis. |
Heathrow Airport: Construction
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Tuesday 11th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what independent modelling her Department has used to conduct cost-benefit analysis of Heathrow expansion; and whether this analysis included consideration of (a) air pollution-related illnesses and premature deaths and (b) NHS expenditure. Answered by Mike Kane - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government has invited proposals for a third runway at Heathrow to be brought forward by the summer. Once proposals have been received, the government will review the Airports National Policy Statement, which provides the basis for decision making on granting development consent for a new runway at Heathrow. The Government has been clear that any airport expansion proposals need to demonstrate that they contribute to economic growth, can be delivered in line with the UK’s legally binding commitments on carbon and meet strict environmental requirements on air quality and noise pollution.
|
Gatwick Airport and Heathrow Airport: Construction
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Tuesday 11th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate her Department has made of the potential impact of the expansion of (a) Heathrow and (b) Gatwick Airport on the level of nitrogen dioxide emissions in (i) Greater London and (ii) the South East. Answered by Mike Kane - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government has invited proposals for a third runway at Heathrow to be brought forward by the summer. Once proposals have been received, the government will review the Airports National Policy Statement, which provides the basis for decision making on granting development consent for a new runway at Heathrow. The Government has been clear that any airport expansion proposals need to demonstrate that they contribute to economic growth, can be delivered in line with the UK’s legally binding commitments on carbon and meet strict environmental requirements on air quality and noise pollution.
On 27 February the Secretary of State has said she is ‘minded to approve’ the expansion of Gatwick Airport. Gatwick Airport is now asked to respond to the Secretary of State on the matters raised by 24 April 2025. The Secretary of State will make her final decision on or before 27 October. As this is a live planning application and the Secretary of State has a quasi-judicial role in this process we therefore cannot comment on it further.
|
Heathrow Airport: Construction
Asked by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) Tuesday 11th March 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of the proposed Heathrow airport expansion on trends in the level of particulate matter. Answered by Mike Kane - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government has invited proposals for a third runway at Heathrow to be brought forward by the summer. Once proposals have been received, the government will review the Airports National Policy Statement, which provides the basis for decision making on granting development consent for a new runway at Heathrow. The Government has been clear that any airport expansion proposals need to demonstrate that they contribute to economic growth, can be delivered in line with the UK’s legally binding commitments on carbon and meet strict environmental requirements on air quality and noise pollution.
On 27 February the Secretary of State has said she is ‘minded to approve’ the expansion of Gatwick Airport. Gatwick Airport is now asked to respond to the Secretary of State on the matters raised by 24 April 2025. The Secretary of State will make her final decision on or before 27 October. As this is a live planning application and the Secretary of State has a quasi-judicial role in this process we therefore cannot comment on it further.
|
Early Day Motions |
---|
Wednesday 5th March 28 signatures (Most recent: 18 Mar 2025) Tabled by: Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat - Wimbledon) That this House regrets the Government’s decision to increase rail fares by 4.6%; notes that this decision comes while cancellations, delays and overcrowding remain endemic; further notes that the hike will cost many commuters hundreds of pounds a year; further regrets that this decision follows years of rising transport costs … |
Early Day Motions Signed |
---|
Thursday 13th February Paul Kohler signed this EDM on Thursday 20th March 2025 Refusal of Citizenship to refugees who have made irregular crossings 74 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2025)Tabled by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East) That this House expresses deep concern over the refusal of citizenship to refugees who have made irregular crossings to the UK; notes that this policy further punishes individuals whose claims of fleeing war, persecution, and danger have been upheld by the asylum system; further notes that, due to a lack … |
Wednesday 12th March Paul Kohler signed this EDM on Tuesday 18th March 2025 Future of the adoption and special guardianship support fund 49 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2025)Tabled by: Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat - Chichester) That this House expresses deep concern over the future of the adoption and special guardianship support fund (ASGSF), which is set to expire on 31 March 2025; recognises the vital role the fund plays in providing essential mental health services to adopted children and those under special guardianship orders, supporting … |
Monday 3rd March Paul Kohler signed this EDM on Tuesday 18th March 2025 Shortages of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy 41 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2025)Tabled by: Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat - Chichester) That this House expresses deep concern over the ongoing shortage of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), a vital medication relied upon by 61,000 people across the UK, including those with pancreatic cancer and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency; notes with alarm that PERT shortages are predicted to continue until 2026, with no … |
Monday 10th March Paul Kohler signed this EDM on Wednesday 12th March 2025 59 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2025) Tabled by: Helen Morgan (Liberal Democrat - North Shropshire) That this House notes the perilous state of community pharmacies, which are struggling to survive across the country; recognises that pharmacies are at the heart of our communities, are an essential part of health and care services, and are relied upon by millions of people every day; further notes that … |
Wednesday 26th February Paul Kohler signed this EDM on Monday 3rd March 2025 Changes to Overseas Development Assistance 61 signatures (Most recent: 18 Mar 2025)Tabled by: Monica Harding (Liberal Democrat - Esher and Walton) That this House expresses concern over the Government’s decision to reduce the UK’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) from 0.5% to 0.3% of Gross National Income (GNI); agrees with the importance of strengthening the UK’s national security and defence commitments, particularly in light of increasing global security challenges, but recognises that … |
Bill Documents |
---|
Mar. 03 2025
Report Stage Proceedings as at 3 March 2025 Finance Act 2025 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Negatived on division_NC8 Daisy Cooper Mr Angus MacDonald Mr Paul Kohler . |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 18th March 2025 2 p.m. Home Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Asylum accommodation At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Sachin Savur - Researcher at Institute for Government Dr Lucy Mort - Senior Research Fellow at Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) Professor Jonathan Darling - Professor in Human Geography at Durham University At 3:30pm: Oral evidence David Bolt - Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration at Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 11th March 2025 2 p.m. Home Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 25th March 2025 9 a.m. Home Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Modern Slavery Act: ten year review At 9:30am: Oral evidence Allyson Davies - Acting Director at Independent Child Trafficking Guardian Services Major Kathy Betteridge - Director for Anti-Trafficking and Modern Slavery at Salvation Army Caroline Haughey KC View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 25th March 2025 9 a.m. Home Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Modern Slavery Act: ten year review At 9:30am: Oral evidence Major Kathy Betteridge - Director for Anti-Trafficking and Modern Slavery at Salvation Army Caroline Haughey KC Emma Hawley - Assistant Director at Independent Child Trafficking Guardian Services At 10:30am: Oral evidence Eleanor Lyons, Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner Baroness Butler-Sloss View calendar - Add to calendar |