(9 years, 11 months ago)
Commons ChamberThe hon. Gentleman raises an important issue. We continue to keep a close eye on the regulations. I would not say that they are being reviewed, but we will look at whether they need to be addressed in view of that current threat.
Let me give the Home Secretary another chance to answer the question that she has failed to answer so far. When Sir James Dyson describes her plans to further restrict post-study work opportunities as a short-sighted attempt to win votes at the expense of the economic interests of the UK, it is a serious matter. Will she think again?
(11 years, 2 months ago)
Commons ChamberWe are working very closely with Motability, and if someone does lose their Motability vehicle and they were in the scheme prior to January 2013 there will be a £2,000 lump sum to help. I must say to the hon. Lady that only 30% of people on the higher rate take Motability, but we will work very closely to ensure those who deserve it continue to get it.
T1. If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
(12 years, 10 months ago)
Ministerial CorrectionsTo ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average length of service is of staff employed by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency at each local office and regional enforcement centre.
[Official Report, 17 January 2012, Vol. 538, c. 637-8W.]
Letter of correction from Mike Penning:
An error has been identified in the written answer given to the hon. Member for Sheffield Central (Paul Blomfield) on 17 January 2012.
The full answer given was as follows:
The following table provides the average length of service of staff employed by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency's local office and regional enforcement centres.
Average length of service in years | |
---|---|
Local Office | |
Aberdeen | 13.8 |
Bangor | 11.9 |
Beverley | 9.6 |
Birmingham | 8.2 |
Borehamwood | 10.7 |
Bournemouth | 11.0 |
Brighton | 11.9 |
Bristol | 9.3 |
Cardiff | 9.6 |
Carlisle | 7.8 |
Chelmsford | 10.8 |
Chester | 10.3 |
Dundee | 10.5 |
Edinburgh | 9.2 |
Exeter | 8.0 |
Glasgow | 9.7 |
Inverness | 5.7 |
Ipswich | 13.1 |
Leeds | 9.7 |
Lincoln | 11.2 |
Maidstone | 13.7 |
Manchester | 8.1 |
Newcastle | 9.4 |
Northampton | 7.2 |
Norwich | 9.4 |
Nottingham | 7.9 |
Oxford | 16.1 |
Peterborough | 8.3 |
Portsmouth | 11.2 |
Preston | 9.4 |
Reading | 9.9 |
Sheffield | 11.8 |
Shrewsbury | 12.5 |
Sidcup | 11.2 |
Stockton | 10.5 |
Swansea Office | 11.0 |
Truro | 6.2 |
Wimbledon | 9.7 |
Worcester | 12.4 |
Central Regional Enforcement Centre | |
Bournemouth | 10.2 |
Glasgow | 11.5 |
Northampton | 9.6 |
(12 years, 10 months ago)
Commons Chamber12. What assessment she has made of the likely effect of proposed changes to the drink-drive rehabilitation scheme.
The consultation document, “New Approval Arrangements for Drink-Drive Rehabilitation Courses”, published in November 2011, contained an initial impact assessment outlining the costs and benefits of the proposals.
Does the Minister accept that there is real concern among those interested in reducing reoffending, including the Justices’ Clerks’ Society, which provides legal advice to magistrates, that introducing multiple providers in an area will lead to a price-driven race to the bottom, with a consequent impact on reoffending rates? Would not a better solution be to have competitive tendering for a single provider in an area to ensure quality and effectiveness of the services?
This matter has been raised with me privately in the past couple of days by several hon. Members in exactly the way the hon. Gentleman asked his question. I will be looking at the matter. The principle of drink-drive rehabilitation schemes is important. Evidence shows that those who take the schemes are more than two and a half times less likely to reoffend—or at least to be caught reoffending; we do not actually know whether they are reoffending, of course. However, we will consider his point.
(14 years ago)
Commons Chamber7. What assessment he has made of the effects of reductions in road safety grants and the ending of Government funding for speed cameras on the number of road traffic (a) accidents and (b) fatalities.
No assessment has been made about the effect on road accidents that may result from changes to road safety grants. The Government continue substantially to fund local transport in local authorities, including for road safety. Speed camera operations can still continue if the local authorities decide that they wish them to do so.
Frankly, I am shocked to hear the Minister say that no assessment has been made regarding the consequences of significant cuts to capital and revenue funding and the ending of specific ring-fencing for local authority road safety grants at a time when local authorities are going to be under unprecedented financial pressure. I urge the Minister to think again about the dangerous consequences of the lack of priority that the Government are giving to road safety.
Especially as an ex-fireman, I can assure the hon. Gentleman that road safety is paramount for this Government. That is why I am taking this forward in such strong ways, particularly with local authorities. It is for local authorities, not central Government, to decide what is best for their communities. Speed cameras have been beneficial in some parts of the country, but they have also been seen as cash cows. It is for local authorities to decide, and we will work with them.