All 3 Debates between Paul Blomfield and Mark Prisk

Wed 21st Jul 2010

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Paul Blomfield and Mark Prisk
Thursday 15th March 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Prisk
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It will be launched next week.

Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield (Sheffield Central) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T1. If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Paul Blomfield and Mark Prisk
Thursday 17th February 2011

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield (Sheffield Central) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Two days ago, with colleagues, I met the business leaders who are board members of Sheffield city regional local enterprise partnership. They are enthusiastic about their task but bemused by the lack of clarity about the powers, responsibilities and resources they will have to undertake it. Will the Minister tell the House when that will be clarified?

Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Prisk
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are setting out the proposals clearly. They are also in the local growth White Paper. We have written to the boards and we are having a summit of all the board leaders together. There are various things that Sheffield will want to do and Leeds will want to do, which are different in other areas. We want to make sure that we do not strangle that initiative.

Sheffield Forgemasters

Debate between Paul Blomfield and Mark Prisk
Wednesday 21st July 2010

(14 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Prisk
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Just one moment, because I think that the letter to which we are referring is not something that all Members have seen. As the hon. Members for Sheffield South East, and for Penistone and Stocksbridge (Angela Smith), know perfectly well, I made sure that the letter was made available—they nod in assent—so that we could look at it in the debate. If I had something to hide, I would not have done that, and hon. Members have noticed that.

I also say to Opposition Members that it is peculiar logic to suggest that a Conservative party donor is the reason why a Liberal Democrat Cabinet member in the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and a Liberal Democrat Chief Secretary, should support the proposal. If the Labour party’s argument is that somehow, a Conservative party donor is managing to twist events in the interests of that party, it has made a mistake, and that is the problem.

Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield (Sheffield Central) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Does the Minister therefore concur with the statement from Downing street that the decision was solely the responsibility of Liberal Democrat Ministers?

Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Prisk
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is not actually what the statement says. The decision was taken by the Government as a whole, and rightly so, but nevertheless, it is one on which the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and the Chief Secretary to the Treasury obviously had the lead. As I made perfectly clear, the argument that somehow a Conservative party donor is twisting the arm of the Liberal Democrats does not make any logical sense.

--- Later in debate ---
Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield
- Hansard - -

Will the Minister give way?

Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Prisk
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, because it is important that I try to answer some of the other questions that were raised and I have only five minutes left. The hon. Gentleman asked some eminently sensible questions and I want to try to give him the answers.