Information between 9th December 2025 - 29th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and against the House One of 4 Independent No votes vs 3 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 96 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and against the House One of 5 Independent No votes vs 5 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 395 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and against the House One of 5 Independent No votes vs 4 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and against the House One of 3 Independent No votes vs 7 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 96 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye and against the House One of 3 Independent Aye votes vs 7 Independent No votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 332 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - UK-EU Customs Union (Duty to Negotiate) - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and in line with the House One of 2 Independent No votes vs 4 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 100 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and against the House One of 4 Independent No votes vs 6 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 173 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Conduct of the Chancellor of the Exchequer - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye and against the House One of 3 Independent Aye votes vs 5 Independent No votes Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 297 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Seasonal Work - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and against the House One of 6 Independent No votes vs 6 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 98 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Seasonal Work - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye and against the House One of 6 Independent Aye votes vs 8 Independent No votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 325 |
|
16 Dec 2025 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and against the House One of 4 Independent No votes vs 5 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 341 Noes - 195 |
|
16 Dec 2025 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye and against the House One of 3 Independent Aye votes vs 5 Independent No votes Tally: Ayes - 118 Noes - 340 |
|
17 Dec 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No and against the House One of 2 Independent No votes vs 4 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 165 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Children: Terminal Illnesses
Asked by: Patrick Spencer (Independent - Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) Friday 12th December 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Business and Trade on the adequacy of financial support for parents of critically and terminally ill children. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State regularly meets with colleagues across Government to discuss a range of issues.
Many parents caring for children and young people with serious illnesses are likely to need additional support through social security. Financial support is available through Universal Credit (UC), a means tested benefit, which if needed, can offer support available on day one through a UC advance. There is also Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for children aged under 16 and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for those over 16. They are available if a child or young person’s condition or illness is of a long-term nature and gives rise to care, daily living or mobility needs. These are not means-tested.
For claimants at the end of life, the Government’s priority is to provide financial support quickly and compassionately through special benefit rules – called the Special Rules for End of Life (SREL). For parents with children nearing the end of life these enable families to get faster, and guaranteed, access to the care component of DLA or the daily living components of PIP, without having to undergo a functional assessment or serve a qualifying period.
People caring for a child in these circumstances can use an independent, free and anonymous benefits calculator to check what they could be entitled to. These are available on Gov.uk and provide estimates of the benefits someone could get, how these payments are affected by re-starting work or by a change in circumstances change. |
|
Conditions of Employment: Parents
Asked by: Patrick Spencer (Independent - Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) Tuesday 16th December 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, when he will launch a consultation into giving employment protection and financial assistance to the parents of critically or terminally ill children. Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) The Department for Business and Trade recognises the heartbreaking situation faced by parents of seriously ill children. We will consult on a leave and pay entitlement for parents in this situation in 2026. Further detail is included in the terms of reference for the review of employment rights for unpaid carers, which was published on 19 November 2025.
There are no plans to extend existing Neonatal Care Leave and Pay legislation to the parents of older children. This would be unsuitable, as it would require altering core principles of an act specifically designed around neonatal care and would risk impacting on the Act’s policy aims. |
|
Parental Leave and Parental Pay
Asked by: Patrick Spencer (Independent - Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) Tuesday 16th December 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of extending neonatal care pay and leave to parents of all critically ill children under 16. Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) The Department for Business and Trade recognises the heartbreaking situation faced by parents of seriously ill children. We will consult on a leave and pay entitlement for parents in this situation in 2026. Further detail is included in the terms of reference for the review of employment rights for unpaid carers, which was published on 19 November 2025.
There are no plans to extend existing Neonatal Care Leave and Pay legislation to the parents of older children. This would be unsuitable, as it would require altering core principles of an act specifically designed around neonatal care and would risk impacting on the Act’s policy aims. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 8th December Patrick Spencer signed this EDM on Wednesday 10th December 2025 9 signatures (Most recent: 17 Dec 2025) Tabled by: James McMurdock (Independent - South Basildon and East Thurrock) That this House expresses its discontent at the decision to cancel multiple mayoral elections in 2026; notes that on Monday 1 December 2025, two days before the cancellation was revealed in the media, the Government stated in response to Written Parliamentary Question 94117 on Local Government: Essex that there were … |