Information between 24th August 2026 - 13th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 411 Noes - 102 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 427 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 346 |
|
4 Sep 2026 - House of Commons - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 19 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 1 Noes - 79 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Plant Health - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 100 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 316 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357 |
|
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 64 Conservative No votes vs 21 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 218 |
|
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 17 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286 |
|
10 Sep 2026 - Social Housing Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Patrick Spencer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 292 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Patrick Spencer speeches from: Safety of the Jewish Community
Patrick Spencer contributed 1 speech (63 words) Tuesday 8th September 2026 - Westminster Hall Home Office |
|
Patrick Spencer speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Patrick Spencer contributed 1 speech (56 words) Monday 7th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Department for Transport: Capital Investment
Asked by: Patrick Spencer (Conservative - Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) Thursday 10th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Department plans to make any further major capital commitments before 2030. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Department remains committed to delivering against our existing capital portfolio. This will be reviewed and updated at future Spending Reviews in the normal way. As per the normal course of business, as key projects progress through Business Case developments further announcements will be made as appropriate.
|
|
Roads: Finance
Asked by: Patrick Spencer (Conservative - Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) Friday 11th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department plans to amend the funding formula for capital funding for local highways authorities. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government plans to review the funding formula that it uses to distribute capital funding to local highways authorities to see whether it can be adjusted to consider, for example, the conditions that affect the wear and tear of local roads. Highways maintenance block allocations have been made up to and including financial year 2029/30. The Department has not yet set a date for the review. It will be important to ensure that the review takes place close to the point that allocations for 2030/31 are made to ensure evidence gathered during the review does not become out of date. When conducting the review, the Department expects to engage with local highway authorities about any future changes to the allocation methodology to understand how any changes might impact on their services. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
7 Sep 2026, 3:30 p.m. - House of Commons " Patrick Spencer Battersea. >> A tiny village with 100 residents. No school, no high street, no no major employer. But it has a train station and a planning application that " Patrick Spencer MP (Central Suffolk and North Ipswich, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |