To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Trusts: Disability
Wednesday 14th October 2026

Asked by: Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat - Didcot and Wantage)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he plans to review the legal status of letters of wishes in Disabled Person's Trusts, in the context of the increasing use of these structures for vulnerable beneficiaries under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 framework.

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

Trusts are commonly used to make long-term financial provision for family members, including children and vulnerable adults.

Trustees must exercise their powers in accordance with the binding terms of the trust instrument and are subject to broader statutory duties.

Letters of wishes can be used to complement the binding legal terms of a trust, by providing guidance about how the person creating the trust would like trustees to exercise their discretion. Letters of wishes are generally not legally binding, but trustees must give the letter of wishes necessary regard when making decisions on how to manage the assets within the trust.

As such, letters of wishes are designed to give guidance while preserving the trustee’s ability to make decisions based on circumstances that may change many years after the letter was written.

The Government currently has no plans to reform the law in this area.


Written Question
Rolling Stock
Wednesday 14th October 2026

Asked by: Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat - Didcot and Wantage)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to section 3.1 of Great British Railways' document entitled Rolling Stock and Infrastructure Strategy, published in September 2026, what assessment she has made of the relative cost, on a whole life long-term basis, of (a) battery trains and (b) full electrification and conventional electric trains.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Rolling Stock and Infrastructure Strategy does not prescribe a single preferred solution for all parts of the network. The relative whole-life costs and benefits of battery-electric trains, partial electrification and full electrification vary according to the characteristics and requirements of individual routes.

As set out in the Strategy, detailed route-by-route analysis will be undertaken to determine the optimum approach in each case. This will consider factors including passenger and freight demand, operational requirements, network connectivity, infrastructure constraints, affordability and value for money. Decisions on the appropriate level of electrification and the most suitable rolling stock technology will therefore be informed by the specific circumstances of each route rather than by a single national assessment.


Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Olly Glover (LD) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 68 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 193
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Olly Glover (LD) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 66 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 312
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Olly Glover (LD) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 67 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 304
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over Extension) - View Vote Context
Olly Glover (LD) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 67 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 179
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 13 Oct 2026
Oral Answers to Questions

"The Government’s commitment to improving the energy efficiency of our homes is welcome and is a stark contrast to the Conservatives’ apparent embrace of a Fred Flintstone home standard. This year saw the hottest summer on record, and climate change science indicates that such temperatures are going to become the …..."
Olly Glover - View Speech

View all Olly Glover (LD - Didcot and Wantage) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 13 Oct 2026
Oral Answers to Questions

"3. Whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of adopting cooling measures into the warm homes scheme. ..."
Olly Glover - View Speech

View all Olly Glover (LD - Didcot and Wantage) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Olly Glover (LD) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 69 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 306
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Draft Railways (Interoperability in Northern Ireland) (Convention on International Carriage by Rail) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context
Olly Glover (LD) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 12 Noes - 4