Noah Law Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Noah Law

Information between 22nd March 2025 - 1st April 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 303
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 304
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 307
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 41
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 299 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 137 Noes - 304
28 Mar 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 33 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 0 Noes - 44
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 62
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 170
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 305
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 302
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 167
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 306
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 167
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 104
31 Mar 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 164
24 Mar 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 74
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 190
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 192
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 180
25 Mar 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 198
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 166
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 179
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 180
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 194
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 117
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 183
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Noah Law voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 196


Speeches
Noah Law speeches from: Water Bill
Noah Law contributed 2 speeches (159 words)
2nd reading
Friday 28th March 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs


Written Answers
Taxation
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Wednesday 26th March 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has considered (a) removing the tapering-off of the personal allowance and (b) reducing the threshold for the additional rate of tax.

Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The withdrawal of the Personal Allowance affects those with income over £100,000 a year, reducing by £1 for every £2 above this threshold until it is fully withdrawn at £125,140.

The additional rate threshold of income tax is currently £125,140, following its reduction from £150,000 in Autumn 2022. The Government remains committed to maintaining strong public finances and ensuring those on higher incomes contribute a fair share.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Drugs
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Thursday 27th March 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department is taking steps to expand the number of organisations under the Right to Choose pathway that are able to have their ADHD prescriptions fulfilled by the NHS.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Shared care within the National Health Service refers to an arrangement whereby a specialist doctor formally transfers responsibility for all or some aspects of their patient’s care, such as the prescription of medication, over to the patient’s general practitioner (GP).

The General Medical Council (GMC), which regulates and sets standards for doctors in the United Kingdom, has made it clear that GPs cannot be compelled to enter into a shared care agreement. Shared care is not part of the GP Contract and as such, participation is voluntary. GPs may decline such requests on clinical or capacity grounds. A GP who has previously agreed to a shared care agreement but who can no longer support it must provide a clear rationale for their decision. Both the GP and the specialist clinician share responsibility for ensuring continuity of care for the patient.

The GMC has also issued guidance to help GPs decide whether to accept shared care responsibilities. In deciding whether to enter into a shared care agreement, a GP will need to consider a number of factors to determine whether it is within their sphere of competence, and therefore safe and suitable for their patient’s needs. This includes being satisfied that any prescriptions or referrals for treatment are clinically appropriate.

If a shared care agreement is not in place, the responsibility for ongoing prescribing remains with the specialist clinician, which applies to both NHS and private medical care.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Thursday 27th March 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that GPs can support ADHD patients under the shared care plans through (a) reassessment, (b) re-prescription of ADHD medication and (c) other measures.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Shared care within the National Health Service refers to an arrangement whereby a specialist doctor formally transfers responsibility for all or some aspects of their patient’s care, such as the prescription of medication, over to the patient’s general practitioner (GP).

The General Medical Council (GMC), which regulates and sets standards for doctors in the United Kingdom, has made it clear that GPs cannot be compelled to enter into a shared care agreement. Shared care is not part of the GP Contract and as such, participation is voluntary. GPs may decline such requests on clinical or capacity grounds. A GP who has previously agreed to a shared care agreement but who can no longer support it must provide a clear rationale for their decision. Both the GP and the specialist clinician share responsibility for ensuring continuity of care for the patient.

The GMC has also issued guidance to help GPs decide whether to accept shared care responsibilities. In deciding whether to enter into a shared care agreement, a GP will need to consider a number of factors to determine whether it is within their sphere of competence, and therefore safe and suitable for their patient’s needs. This includes being satisfied that any prescriptions or referrals for treatment are clinically appropriate.

If a shared care agreement is not in place, the responsibility for ongoing prescribing remains with the specialist clinician, which applies to both NHS and private medical care.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Thursday 27th March 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department is taking steps to hire more specialists in the diagnosis of adult ADHD.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

NHS England has established an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) taskforce which is working to bring together those with lived experience with experts from the National Health Service, education, charity, and justice sectors. The taskforce is working to get a better understanding of the challenges affecting those with ADHD, including timely and equitable access to services and support, with the final report expected in the summer of 2025.

In conjunction with the taskforce, NHS England has carried out detailed work to develop an ADHD data improvement plan, to inform future service planning. NHS England has also captured examples from integrated care boards who are trialling innovative ways of delivering ADHD services, and is using this information to support systems to tackle ADHD waiting lists and provide support to address people’s needs.

We will publish a refreshed Long Term Workforce Plan to deliver the transformed health service we will build over the next decade, and treat patients on time again. We will ensure the NHS has the right people, in the right places, with the right skills to deliver the care patients need, when they need it.

Mental Health Services: Cornwall
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Wednesday 26th March 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many mental health workers will be recruited in Cornwall by 2029.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

As part of our mission to build a National Health Service that is fit for the future and that is there when people need it, the Government will recruit an additional 8,500 mental health workers to reduce delays and provide faster treatment, which will also help ease pressure on busy mental health services. We are working with NHS England to consider options to deliver this commitment.

Whilst we don’t have the breakdown of how many mental health workers will be recruited in specific constituencies, this summer we will publish a refreshed Long Term Workforce Plan to deliver the transformed health service we will build over the next decade and treat patients on time again. We will ensure the NHS has the right people, in the right places, with the right skills to deliver the care patients need when they need it.

Office for Budget Responsibility: Forecasts
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Friday 28th March 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the Office for Budget Responsibility's methodology for understanding fiscal multipliers.

Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is responsible for preparing forecasts for the UK economy and public finances. This includes an assessment of the impact of government policies, where the OBR regularly reviews and publish papers on its approach.

The OBR assesses the demand side impacts of policy using multipliers – these estimate the impact on real GDP from government policy. The OBR’s multiplier framework is described in Dynamic scoring of policy measures in OBR forecasts.

The OBR also takes account of how specific policies affect the supply side of the economy. This approach is set out in Forecasting potential output - the supply side of the economy.

The OBR have also recently published a new framework for assessing public investment which can be found in the OBR’s Discussion Paper No. 5: Public investment and potential output. This framework was used in the Autumn Budget 2024, where the OBR judged the increase in departmental capital spending would directly raise potential output by 1.1 percent by 2073-74.

The Chancellor and OBR Budget Responsibility Committee speak regularly, and there is an ongoing dialogue at official level on a range of issues. This includes the OBR’s approach to preparing forecasts for the UK economy and public finances.

The OBR committed to reviewing their demand multipliers in their most recent forecast, published on Wednesday 26th March 2025.

Sugar: Taxation
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Thursday 27th March 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has considered introducing a small levy on imported sugar; and if she will make an assessment of the potential impact of such a levy on (a) tariff revenues following the suspension of Ukrainian sugar tariffs and (b) incentives in the food and beverage industry to transition to sweeteners.

Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The UK already has significant tariffs on UK sugar imports which are imported via the Most Favoured Nation route. These are £280 per tonne for cane sugar for refining and £350 per tonne for other types of sugar. They are, other than in exceptional circumstances, effectively prohibitive to imports via this route and instead imports come from jurisdictions with preferential access. The government has no plans to introduce tariffs on imports from countries which have preferential access into the UK market.

The government recognises the harms caused by high sugar intake and took steps at Autumn Budget 2024 to ensure the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) remains effective and fit-for-purpose. The levy will be increased, over the next five years to reflect inflation since 2018.

Business: Taxation
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Thursday 27th March 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she hold discussions with HMRC on the potential merits of extending terms for the collection of taxes from businesses; and if she will make an assessment of the potential impact of doing so on working capital for businesses.

Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

HMRC takes its responsibility seriously to make sure that individuals and businesses who can pay, do so on time. Where taxpayers need additional support, they can enter into payment arrangements with HMRC, allowing taxpayers to pay their tax, including VAT and PAYE, via instalments.

Companies pay Corporation Tax nine months and one day after the end of the accounting period, or in quarterly payments if they are a large company.

At the Spring Statement the Government announced further measures to close the tax gap, to ensure more taxpayers pay the tax they owe.

Nurses: Training
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Friday 28th March 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will have discussions with Cabinet colleagues on reforming student loan repayment rules to exempt nurses from repaying those loans while they are employed within the NHS.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government currently has no plans to exempt nurses from repaying student loans. The Government keeps the funding arrangements for all healthcare students under close review in order to balance the use of finite financial resources with the level of support students require.

British International Investment
Asked by: Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
Tuesday 25th March 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of asking British International Investment to produce a critical minerals strategy that (a) strengthens the UK's supply chains and (b) supports its development goals.

Answered by Stephen Doughty - Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

British International Investment's (BII) mission is to help solve the biggest global development challenges by investing patient, flexible capital to support private sector growth and innovation. With regards to the critical minerals sector, BII's role is currently most relevant where it supports investments in the enabling infrastructure around critical minerals projects. As part of BII's next strategy, we will consider whether and how BII's approach to critical minerals should evolve.



MP Financial Interests
24th March 2025
Noah Law (Labour - St Austell and Newquay)
4. Visits outside the UK
International visit to Taiwan between 14 February 2025 and 25 February 2025
Source



Noah Law mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Cornish Language and Heritage (Education and Recognition)
2 speeches (1,280 words)
Wednesday 26th March 2025 - Commons Chamber

Mentions:
1: Anna Gelderd (Lab - South East Cornwall) Thank you.Question put and agreed to.Ordered,That Anna Gelderd, Jayne Kirkham, Noah Law, Perran Moon, - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Oral Evidence - House of Commons

The FCDO's approach to value for money - International Development Committee

Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Sarah Champion (Chair); Tracy Gilbert; Noah Law; Brian Mathew; David

Tuesday 25th March 2025
Oral Evidence - Action Through Enterprise

The FCDO's approach to value for money - International Development Committee

Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Sarah Champion (Chair); Tracy Gilbert; Noah Law; Brian Mathew; David




Noah Law - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 1st April 2025 1:30 p.m.
International Development Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: The FCDO's approach to displaced people
At 2:00pm: Oral evidence
Daphne Jayasinghe - Director of Policy – Global Protracted Displacement Team at International Rescue Committee
Bethan Lewis - Head of humanitarian unit at Plan International UK
Gideon Rabinowitz - Director of policy and advocacy at Bond
At 2:45pm: Oral evidence
Dr Jessica Hagen-Zanker - Head of the migration and displacement hub at ODI Global
Louis Hoffmann - Senior Coordinator for Peace, Recovery and Solutions at International Organization for Migration
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 1st April 2025 1:30 p.m.
International Development Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: The FCDO's approach to displaced people
At 2:00pm: Oral evidence
Daphne Jayasinghe - Director of Policy – Global Protracted Displacement Team at International Rescue Committee
Bethan Lewis - Head of humanitarian unit at Plan International UK
Gideon Rabinowitz - Director of policy and advocacy at Bond
At 2:45pm: Oral evidence
Dr Jessica Hagen-Zanker - Head of the migration and displacement hub at ODI Global
Louis Hoffmann - Senior Coordinator for Peace, Recovery and Solutions at International Organization for Migration
Hélène Kuperman-Le-Bihan - Head of MAG Europe at Mines Advisory Group
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 1st April 2025 1:30 p.m.
International Development Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: The FCDO's approach to displaced people
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Thursday 27th March 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister of State for International Development relating to Initial 2025/26 Official Development Assistance (ODA) allocations and the Spring Statement - 27 March 2025

International Development Committee
Tuesday 1st April 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Foreign Secretary and Chancellor of the Exchequer relating to Reductions to the ODA budget - 25 March 2025

International Development Committee
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Written Evidence - International Rescue Committee UK
ADP0017 - The FCDO's approach to displaced people

The FCDO's approach to displaced people - International Development Committee
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Written Evidence - Conciliation Resources
HAA0041 - Humanitarian access and adherence to international humanitarian law

Humanitarian access and adherence to international humanitarian law - International Development Committee
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Oral Evidence - House of Commons

The FCDO's approach to value for money - International Development Committee
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Oral Evidence - Action Through Enterprise

The FCDO's approach to value for money - International Development Committee
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Oral Evidence - Action Through Enterprise

The FCDO's approach to value for money - International Development Committee
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Oral Evidence - House of Commons

The FCDO's approach to value for money - International Development Committee
Tuesday 1st April 2025
Oral Evidence - ODI Global, International Organization for Migration, and Mines Advisory Group

The FCDO's approach to displaced people - International Development Committee
Tuesday 1st April 2025
Oral Evidence - International Rescue Committee, Plan International UK, and Bond

The FCDO's approach to displaced people - International Development Committee
Monday 7th April 2025
Special Report - Large Print - 3rd Special Report - Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory: Government Response

International Development Committee
Monday 7th April 2025
Special Report - 3rd Special Report - Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory: Government Response

International Development Committee
Monday 7th April 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Minister of State for International Development, Latin America and Caribbean relating to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory - 3 April 2025

International Development Committee
Tuesday 8th April 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister for the Indo-Pacific relating to the Spending Review submission - 7 April 2025

International Development Committee
Tuesday 8th April 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Minister for the Indo-Pacific relating to the Spending Review submission - 4 February 2025

International Development Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
8 Apr 2025
Aid for community-led energy
International Development Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 16 May 2025)


Energy lies at the core of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Yet, the international community remains largely off track in meeting these commitments. According to the International Energy Agency, around 750 million people lack access to electricity, and more than 2 billion people lack access to clean cooking fuels, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa.

Future energy systems need to be renewable, inclusive, and resilient. Decentralised energy, where generation and governance occur closer to the point of use, is gaining traction as a way to achieve these goals. ‘Community energy’ is one approach within this broader shift, ensuring that people play a central role in decision-making and ownership. Whether through local control or collective governance, these systems give communities a direct stake in their energy future. More broadly, decentralised energy models, ranging from cooperative solar projects to independent microgrids, can accelerate the deployment of renewables and generate significant local socio-economic benefits. However, challenges such as financing constraints, technical capacity, and regulatory hurdles continue to limit their expansion.

This inquiry will explore locally led development in the context of energy systems. It will assess the UK Government’s role in addressing global energy poverty while promoting clean energy and strengthening local communities abroad. It will seek to understand how much Official Development Assistance (ODA) supports localised energy projects, how effective and transformative this funding is, and where gaps exist in financing, technology, and capacity-building. It is interested in understanding the value-for-money of financing localised energy projects, accounting for their full environmental and social benefits.

Join the conversation on X using @CommonsIDC