Debates between Nigel Mills and George Kerevan during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Tue 18th Apr 2017
Finance (No. 2) Bill
Commons Chamber

2nd reading: House of Commons

Finance (No. 2) Bill

Debate between Nigel Mills and George Kerevan
2nd reading: House of Commons
Tuesday 18th April 2017

(7 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Finance Act 2017 View all Finance Act 2017 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nigel Mills Portrait Nigel Mills
- Hansard - -

I absolutely agree: it is important that we continue to send the signal that Britain is a great place to do business and to invest. We want as much international investment here as we can get, so it is absolutely right to have a headline corporation tax rate that is as low as we can have it. I welcome the fact that we are going to get it down to 17%. The previous Chancellor hinted that he might have used 15% to give a sense of direction; perhaps the Government will look into using that in the manifesto we are about to produce.

George Kerevan Portrait George Kerevan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Can the hon. Gentleman explain why Germany, which has a much higher headline rate of corporation tax, does so much better industrially?

Nigel Mills Portrait Nigel Mills
- Hansard - -

I think I would have had to attend several of the hon. Gentleman’s lectures to understand better how the German economy works, but that is not something I have ever studied. We could probably talk about euro rates and the history of investment in skills and so on, but I suspect it is not all down to corporation tax.

Finance (No. 2) Bill

Debate between Nigel Mills and George Kerevan
Monday 11th April 2016

(8 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nigel Mills Portrait Nigel Mills (Amber Valley) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to be called so early in the debate. I strongly support the Bill, which will encourage saving, reward work, encourage business investment and tackle aggressive tax avoidance. Those things are exactly what we want to see in a Finance Bill and they are all in this one.

Given that, I cannot understand why anyone would choose to vote against the whole Bill. It seems to be largely because of the changes to capital gains tax and corporation tax. I will go back as far as Gordon Brown’s first Budget after becoming Chancellor, in which he effectively introduced a 10% capital gains tax rate and reduced the corporation tax rate. Perhaps we can remember when we had a Labour Government who at least tried, in the early years, to be friendly to business and encourage investment and growth in this country.

George Kerevan Portrait George Kerevan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Gentleman explain why the present Chancellor raised capital gains tax to 28%?