All 4 Debates between Nick Boles and Neil Carmichael

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Nick Boles and Neil Carmichael
Tuesday 15th March 2016

(8 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - -

It gives me great pleasure to be able to agree entirely with the hon. Lady. This is incredibly important. The current rate of participation in apprenticeships is not too bad—I think it is about 8.8%—but we can always do more. We need to ensure that the requirements for the qualifications, particularly in English and maths, that some people have to acquire as part of their apprenticeships do not discriminate against those who are disabled.

Neil Carmichael Portrait Neil Carmichael (Stroud) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Secretary of State agree that, given that Conservatives In is keen to promote the economic case for our remaining in the European Union, it is excellent news that the CBI has said that 80% of its members support the EU?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Nick Boles and Neil Carmichael
Monday 25th January 2016

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - -

It is fairly amazing to hear an Opposition Member attack the apprenticeship levy, which is something that the Opposition thought was so extraordinarily left-wing that they were not willing to propose it in their manifesto. I should have thought that the modern Labour party would consider it a thoroughly mainstream suggestion. As for the hon. Gentleman’s other comments, he will have observed that his party organised an Opposition debate to attack the 25% to 40% slashing of further education budgets, which did not happen when the Chancellor stood at the Dispatch Box and confirmed that we were going to maintain adult skills funding and 16 to 19 funding.

Neil Carmichael Portrait Neil Carmichael (Stroud) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Returning to the subject at hand, does the Minister agree that it is really important to focus on technical and professional training, and that the best way to do so is to provide apprenticeships that have quality as a hallmark, and attract people who know that that will lead to a job, and know the value of being an apprentice?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Nick Boles and Neil Carmichael
Monday 30th November 2015

(9 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - -

I assume that the hon. Gentleman will be able to tell me, not least because a Labour Government put up with it for 13 years.

Neil Carmichael Portrait Neil Carmichael (Stroud) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Minister agree that a great advantage of this change will be that it will enable sixth form colleges to become academies and therefore part of multi-academy trusts, which will stimulate them to even greater things?

Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - -

I entirely agree with the Chairman of the Select Committee on Education. One of the great opportunities that this proposal offers is for sixth form colleges to become part of academy groups, to become the sixth form for those academy groups and to thrive.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Nick Boles and Neil Carmichael
Monday 3rd March 2014

(10 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Neil Carmichael Portrait Neil Carmichael (Stroud) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There are neighbourhood plans in Chalford, Dursley, Eastington and nearly a dozen other areas in my constituency. Does the Minister agree that a good neighbourhood plan is an appropriate protector against inappropriate developments?

Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I look forward to visiting his constituency with him in the near future to see the planning work being done in some of his communities and by his local authority.