Debates between Neil O'Brien and Bob Blackman during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Mon 23rd Apr 2018
Rating (Property in Common Occupation) and Council Tax (Empty Dwellings) Bill
Commons Chamber

2nd reading: House of Commons & Programme motion: House of Commons & Ways and Means resolution: House of Commons

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Neil O'Brien and Bob Blackman
Thursday 7th March 2019

(5 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman (Harrow East) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

3. What steps the CPS is taking to improve its response to serious and organised crime.

Neil O'Brien Portrait Neil O’Brien (Harborough) (Con)
- Hansard - -

4. What steps the CPS is taking to improve its response to serious and organised crime.

Rating (Property in Common Occupation) and Council Tax (Empty Dwellings) Bill

Debate between Neil O'Brien and Bob Blackman
2nd reading: House of Commons & Programme motion: House of Commons & Ways and Means resolution: House of Commons
Monday 23rd April 2018

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Rating (Property in Common Occupation) and Council Tax (Empty Dwellings) Act 2018 View all Rating (Property in Common Occupation) and Council Tax (Empty Dwellings) Act 2018 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Clearly, we want our town centres and shopping areas to be revitalised through people living in them and going to them. If people live in the flats above shops, that brings life to the area 24 hours a day, rather than for maybe 12 hours a day, and that must be to our advantage.

Neil O'Brien Portrait Neil O’Brien (Harborough) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Further to the point made by our hon. Friend the Member for Walsall North (Eddie Hughes) about empty shops, I am aware of a house in Huddersfield, where I grew up, that was empty for literally decades on end. It was not just a waste of space and precious land; it was a huge eyesore that dragged down property prices all around. It was deeply ugly and people wanted shot of it. Does my hon. Friend agree that bringing those kinds of properties back into use is the first place we should go to, rather than necessarily building on greenfield sites?

Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure that colleagues across the House could come up with example after example of empty homes that could have been brought back into use many years ago. Some should possibly have been demolished and replaced—I have those in my constituency —but the sad reality is that we still have far too many empty homes that should be brought back into use. Those that are derelict and have not been used for literally decades are the first that we should penalise and look to bring back into operation.

Let me end by asking Ministers to look sympathetically at how we can compensate local authorities for the loss of revenue—we have suggested a means by which that could be done—how we can get guidance to local authorities so that they do not penalise small businesses because we are correcting the law in the interim, and how we can get to a position whereby some sensible decisions can be taken as quickly as possible and small businesses that face difficulties meeting their finances are given help and advice, rather than being closed down by banks and other operations that may wish to penalise them in that way. If we can do those things, this will be a good Bill.