Information between 13th April 2026 - 23rd April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 162 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 156 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 159 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 158 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 77 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Neil O'Brien voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155 |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Asylum
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to sheet Ret_04 of the data release entitled 'Returns summary tables, year ending December 2025', updated on 26 February 2026, if she will publish a further breakdown of the nationalities currently grouped under "Other” for asylum-related returns in 2025. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) As you are aware, the Home Office publishes statistics on the number of returns from the UK in the ‘Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release’. The latest data on returns from the UK, by nationality and asylum and non-asylum is published in table Ret_04 of the ‘Returns summary tables’. The latest data goes up to the end of December 2025. Official statistics published by the Home Office are kept under review in line with the Code of Practice for Statistics, taking into account a number of factors including user needs, the resources required to compile the statistics, as well as quality and availability of data. These reviews allow us to balance the production of our regular statistics whilst developing new statistics for future release. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Asylum
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many asylum-related returns there were in 2025 for people from (a) Bangladesh, (b) Afghanistan, (c) Iran and (d) Sri Lanka. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) As you are aware, the Home Office publishes statistics on the number of returns from the UK in the ‘Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release’. The latest data on returns from the UK, by nationality and asylum and non-asylum is published in table Ret_04 of the ‘Returns summary tables’. The latest data goes up to the end of December 2025. Official statistics published by the Home Office are kept under review in line with the Code of Practice for Statistics, taking into account a number of factors including user needs, the resources required to compile the statistics, as well as quality and availability of data. These reviews allow us to balance the production of our regular statistics whilst developing new statistics for future release. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Universal Credit
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, of the households exempt from the Benefit Cap due to receipt of the Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) element of Universal Credit, how many contain a second working age adult who is not in receipt of LCWRA. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Freedom of Information
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Tuesday 14th April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the Government plans to change the law or guidance around Freedom of Information requests. Answered by Chris Ward - Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet Office) The Government is committed to Freedom of Information (“FOI”) and continues to monitor the performance and implementation of the FOI Act to ensure it is operating as intended by Parliament.
Any changes to FOI legislation will be subject to Parliamentary scrutiny.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Orders
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of people who received a sentence of unpaid work failed to (a) start and (b) complete their sentence in each of the last five years. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip The data requested can be found in the following table:
Periods marked with an asterisk (*) indicate incomplete performance years. The data provided is from July 2021, the month following the reunification of the Probation Service. All data has been sourced from nDelius on 13/04/2026. While this data has been assured as much as practical, as with any large administrative dataset, the data should not be assumed to be accurate to the last value presented. Please note, data relating to those sentenced in 2025/26 has not been provided as recording of this period is still ongoing and it would therefore not portray a true reflection of current performance. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Orders
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of individuals sentenced to an unpaid work requirement last year were given a (a) community order, (b) suspended sentence order, (c) youth rehabilitation order, (d) enforcement order and (e) supervision default order. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip The data requested are provided in the attached excel tables. The decision as to what type of order to impose at sentence, or when imposing any other type of Order in court, is a matter for our independent judiciary, taking into account all the circumstances of the case before them. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Orders
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many community sentences were passed in each of the last ten years; and what proportion of these included an unpaid work requirement. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip The data requested are provided in the attached excel tables. The decision as to what type of order to impose at sentence, or when imposing any other type of Order in court, is a matter for our independent judiciary, taking into account all the circumstances of the case before them. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Orders
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of sentences given in each of the last five years included an unpaid work requirement. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip The data requested are provided in the attached excel tables. The decision as to what type of order to impose at sentence, or when imposing any other type of Order in court, is a matter for our independent judiciary, taking into account all the circumstances of the case before them. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Universal Credit: Deductions
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many Universal Credit households in the most recent quarter for which data is available are undergoing a third party deduction for the purpose of paying a court fine. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Around 250,000 Universal Credit households had at least one third party deduction for court fines in the quarter ending in November 2025.
Notes: 1. Figures have been calculated by identifying Universal Credit households with at least one thirdparty deduction for court fines during any month within the quarter. Households with a court fines deduction in more than one month of the quarter have been counted once only, to reflect the number of unique households affected during the period. 2. Data up to November 2025 has been provided in line with the latest available Universal Credit Deductions Statistics. 3. Figures have been provided for Universal Credit households in Great Britain. 4. Figures are provisional and are subject to retrospective change as later data becomes available. 5. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10,000. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many grants of indefinite leave to remain have been revoked and have lapsed in each year since 2004. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The information requested is not currently available from published statistics, and the relevant data could only be collated and verified for the purpose of answering this question at disproportionate costs. Under section 12(1) of the FOIA, the Home Office is not obliged to comply with an information request where to do so would exceed the appropriate limit. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Orders: Staff
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many Community Payback supervisors have been employed in each of the last five years. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip The number of band 3 Community Payback supervisors employed by His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service in each of the last five years is given in the following table. Figures are provided for 31 December each year and are on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis. Table: Number of FTE band 3 Community Payback supervisors in post on 31 December: 2021 to 2025
Notes: 1. Only includes band 3 staff with the job title of ‘community payback supervisor’. Any staff with that job title but are not band 3 are not included. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Railways: Graffiti
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the cost was to the public purse of graffiti removal across the Network Rail network in each of the last five years. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The cost of graffiti removal across the Network Rail network is available on Network Rail’s website.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Adoption and Special Guardianship Orders
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Tuesday 21st April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many children aged (a) under one years old, (b) aged between one and four years old and (c) aged five years and older were (i) adopted and (ii) given a Special guardianship order in each year since 1996. Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) Data on the age of the children subject to adoption and Special Guardianship Orders is routinely published in Family Court Quarterly statistics and the relevant tables are attached. Data prior to 2011 is not readily available and to source it would incur disproportionate costs. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Adoption and Special Guardianship Orders
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Tuesday 21st April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many children aged (a) under one, (b) one, (c) two, (d) three, (e) four, (f) five, (g) six, (h) seven, (i) eight, (j) nine and (k) ten and over years old were (i) adopted and (ii) subject of a Special Guardianship Order in each year since 2021. Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) Data on age of children subject to adoption and Special Guardianship Orders is routinely published in the quarterly Family Court Statistics and the relevant tables are attached. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Department of Health and Social Care: Disciplinary Proceedings
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Tuesday 21st April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the past twelve months, how many disciplinary cases were concluded against civil servants in (a) the Department and (b) its agencies broken down by (i) outcome and (ii) whether the primary allegation related to (A) performance and (B) conduct. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) In the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), poor performance is handled under DHSC's Supporting Performance Improvement Policy, so all disciplinary cases relate only to alleged misconduct. In DHSC there were 23 formal disciplinary cases concluded between 1 December 2024 and 30 November 2025. Where the number of case outcomes is under five, the number of cases in the category has been suppressed to avoid individuals becoming identifiable. The outcomes for these formal cases are categorised as follows:
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) manages poor performance and discipline under separate policies, so all disciplinary cases relate to alleged misconduct. In MHRA during the same requested period there were six formal disciplinary cases concluded in total. The outcomes of these six cases are categorised as follows:
As the total number of individual case outcomes under each category is under five, the number of case outcomes in each category has been suppressed to avoid individuals becoming identifiable. In line with DHSC and MHRA, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) manages poor performance and discipline under separate policies, so all case outcomes relate to alleged misconduct.
In UKHSA during the same requested period there were 58 formal disciplinary cases concluded. UKHSA is a larger organisation than DHSC and MHRA combined, with a higher volume of HR cases. The number of outcomes in each category is listed below, given there are at least five outcomes in each category:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Civil Servants: Canary Wharf
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Tuesday 21st April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether civil servants relocated to Canary Wharf count as having moved out of central London for statistical purposes. Answered by Anna Turley - Minister without Portfolio (Cabinet Office) Civil servants who have been moved to Canary Wharf do count as having been moved out of Central London. Utilising estate capacity in Outer London reduces pressure on Whitehall estate and ensures that we have accessible working spaces across the capital. However, only roles which move out of London entirely are counted as role relocations under the Places for Growth programme.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Students: Loans
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to her Department's press release entitled Interest rate cap introduced to protect Plan 2 borrowers, published on 7 April 2026, what estimate her Department has made of the cost to the public purse of capping interest on Plan 2 and 3 student loans at 6% for the 2026/7 academic year. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) I refer the hon. Member for Harborough, Oadby and Wigston to the answer of 22 April 2026 to Question 124528. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many grants of indefinite leave to remain have been revoked and have lapsed in the most recent year or quarter for which data is available. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The information requested is not available from published statistics, and the relevant data could only be collated and verified for the purpose of answering this question at disproportionate costs. Under section 12(1) of the FOIA, the Home Office is not obliged to comply with an information request where to do so would exceed the appropriate limit. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Orders
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many hours of unpaid work were (a) sentenced and (b) credited in each of the last five years. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip Between July 2021 and June 2025, a total of 24,341,125 hours of unpaid work were sentenced in England and Wales. In the same period, 17,614,065 hours of unpaid work were credited in England and Wales.
Periods marked with an asterisk (*) indicate incomplete performance years. Hours sentenced are the number of hours that the offender is required to work as part of the sentence of the court. Upon attendance of the unpaid work session, the time the offender spends working will be credited towards the number of hours they have been ordered to complete. This includes where a person attends a session and subsequently fails to comply with instructions or is sent home due to poor behaviour, or where service issues during the day cause a session to be cancelled. Data from April 2022 to June 2025 sourced from the latest published statistics on unpaid work. A link can be found here - Unpaid work management information, update to June 2025 - GOV.UK Data from July 2021 to March 2022 sourced from nDelius on 13/04/2026. While these data have been assured as much as practical, as with any large administrative dataset, the data should not be assumed to be accurate to the last value presented. Data from the biannual Unpaid Work publication are rounded to the nearest five hours worked for data suppression purposes and yearly totals are calculated on the rounded values of each quarter. To be consistent with the publication, the same principle has been applied to data between July 2021 and March 2022. The next publication is due on 14 May 2026. Data are provided from July 2021, the month following the reunification of the Probation Service. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Orders
Asked by: Neil O'Brien (Conservative - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the total annual cost of administering the Community Payback scheme was in each of the last five years; and what the average cost per (a) sentence and (b) completed hour of unpaid work was in each of those years. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip
In terms of what the total cost covers, it is things such as staffing costs, fleet (vans) and tools. We do not hold information on average cost per sentence in the format requested. The average cost per hour of Unpaid Work credited was £17.15 (2022/23), £19.14 (2023/24) and £21.24 (2024/25). Data are not provided for the performance year 2021/22 as this is only a partial year of data following the reunification of the Probation Service. The average cost per hour credited is calculated by dividing the total spend by the number of hours credited in each year. |