Information between 1st March 2025 - 11th March 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 339 Noes - 172 |
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 332 |
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 324 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 347 |
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 331 |
6 Mar 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 13 |
6 Mar 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 13 |
6 Mar 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 13 Noes - 3 |
6 Mar 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 13 |
6 Mar 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Neil Coyle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
Speeches |
---|
Neil Coyle speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Neil Coyle contributed 6 speeches (150 words) 2nd reading Monday 10th March 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
Neil Coyle speeches from: Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill (Eighth sitting)
Neil Coyle contributed 2 speeches (62 words) Committee stage: 8th sitting Thursday 6th March 2025 - Public Bill Committees Department for Work and Pensions |
Neil Coyle speeches from: Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill (Fifth sitting)
Neil Coyle contributed 3 speeches (127 words) Committee stage: 6th sitting Tuesday 4th March 2025 - Public Bill Committees Cabinet Office |
Written Answers |
---|
Immigration: Poverty
Asked by: Neil Coyle (Labour - Bermondsey and Old Southwark) Monday 3rd March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the No Recourse to Public Funds policy on trends in the level of child poverty. Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Tackling child poverty is at the heart of this Government’s mission to break down barriers to opportunity. The government is working to develop a strategy to drive forward short and long-term actions to reduce child poverty. The strategy will consider levers to alleviate poverty experienced by all children in the UK, regardless of immigration status, including children either subject to or impacted by the No Recourse to Public Funds policy. |
Midwives: Self-employed
Asked by: Neil Coyle (Labour - Bermondsey and Old Southwark) Friday 7th March 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he is taking steps to support self-employed midwives. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Independent midwives make a valuable contribution to midwifery services across the country. As they are not employed by the National Health Service, we do not have any influence over their pay or terms and conditions, or how they access learning, development, and pastoral support. Many self-employed midwives are members of Independent Midwifery UK, which does offer support and mentoring. Local employers who work with self-employed midwives are best placed to determine what additional support they can offer, in the interests of delivering high quality services. |
Midwives: Self-employed
Asked by: Neil Coyle (Labour - Bermondsey and Old Southwark) Friday 7th March 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to facilitate access to professional indemnity insurance for self-employed midwives. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) In England, most National Health Services are covered by the state indemnity schemes administered by NHS Resolution. Therefore, midwives working in NHS trusts, other member organisations, and general practices are covered by the state indemnity schemes, namely the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) and the Clinical Negligence Scheme for General Practice, respectively. Where self-employed midwives are not covered by state schemes, they need to obtain independent cover which is mainly through regulated insurance or via discretionary indemnity offered primarily by medical defence organisations. In 2020, the difficulty in accessing indemnity was highlighted by self-employed midwives. Alternative arrangements were agreed via an NHS contract which enabled self-employed midwives to be covered by the state scheme, the CNST. A number use this model, although we understand some do not. The Department is currently considering policy measures to address gaps in the clinical indemnities system. We would be happy to take further evidence from self-employed midwives to determine issues specific to them and the scale of the problem. |
Bill Documents |
---|
Mar. 11 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 11 March 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _38 Sarah Olney Rachael Maskell Neil Coyle Sarah Smith . |
Mar. 10 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 March 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _38 Sarah Olney Rachael Maskell Neil Coyle Sarah Smith . |
Mar. 07 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _38 Sarah Olney Rachael Maskell Neil Coyle Sarah Smith . |
Mar. 07 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 March 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _38 Sarah Olney Rachael Maskell Neil Coyle Sarah Smith . |
Mar. 06 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 6 March 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _38 Sarah Olney Rachael Maskell Neil Coyle Sarah Smith . |
Mar. 05 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 5 March 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _72 Dr Ben Spencer Laurence Turner Neil Coyle Helen Hayes . |
Mar. 05 2025
All proceedings up to 5 March 2025 at Public Bill Committee Stage Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Not selected_35 Sarah Olney Rachael Maskell Neil Coyle Marsha De Cordova Dame Meg Hillier Sarah |
Mar. 04 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 4 March 2025 Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _39 Sarah Olney Rachael Maskell Neil Coyle Sarah Smith . |
Mar. 04 2025
All proceedings up to 4 March 2025 at Public Bill Committee Stage Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Negatived on division_11 Sarah Bool Rachael Maskell Neil Coyle Marsha De Cordova Rebecca Paul Dame |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 11th March 2025 9:25 a.m. Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 11th March 2025 2 p.m. Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 18th March 2025 9:25 a.m. Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
Thursday 13th March 2025 11:30 a.m. Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |