Naz Shah Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Naz Shah

Information between 7th January 2026 - 17th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181


Written Answers
Flats: Insulation
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Thursday 15th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps the Department is taking to ensure that leaseholders can sell flats where external fire risk assessments identify remedial works.

Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Ten major banks and building societies have signed the lenders’ statement on cladding. These lenders have committed to consider mortgage applications for buildings over 11 metres tall, even if a property has building safety issues, provided either the building has funding for works from government or the developer, or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act, and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it.

Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement.

We are of the firm belief that mortgage lenders should not request an EWS1 form as a requirement to lend on buildings under 11 metres tall, but whether they do so remains their commercial decision and is subject to their individual lending criteria.

Flats: Mortgages
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Thursday 15th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, how his Department ensures lenders comply with guidance that EWS1 forms are not required for buildings under 11 metres.

Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Ten major banks and building societies have signed the lenders’ statement on cladding. These lenders have committed to consider mortgage applications for buildings over 11 metres tall, even if a property has building safety issues, provided either the building has funding for works from government or the developer, or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act, and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it.

Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement.

We are of the firm belief that mortgage lenders should not request an EWS1 form as a requirement to lend on buildings under 11 metres tall, but whether they do so remains their commercial decision and is subject to their individual lending criteria.

Flats: Mortgages
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Thursday 15th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what support or enforcement the Department can provide where lenders block transactions contrary to fire safety guidance.

Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Ten major banks and building societies have signed the lenders’ statement on cladding. These lenders have committed to consider mortgage applications for buildings over 11 metres tall, even if a property has building safety issues, provided either the building has funding for works from government or the developer, or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act, and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it.

Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement.

We are of the firm belief that mortgage lenders should not request an EWS1 form as a requirement to lend on buildings under 11 metres tall, but whether they do so remains their commercial decision and is subject to their individual lending criteria.



MP Financial Interests
5th January 2026
Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
4. Visits outside the UK
International visit to Qatar between 05 December 2025 and 14 December 2025
Source