Naz Shah Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Naz Shah

Information between 4th January 2026 - 24th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 182
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 185
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 184
20 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 127
21 Jan 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles: Legacy and Reconciliation - View Vote Context
Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 299 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 373 Noes - 106


Written Answers
Flats: Insulation
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Thursday 15th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps the Department is taking to ensure that leaseholders can sell flats where external fire risk assessments identify remedial works.

Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Ten major banks and building societies have signed the lenders’ statement on cladding. These lenders have committed to consider mortgage applications for buildings over 11 metres tall, even if a property has building safety issues, provided either the building has funding for works from government or the developer, or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act, and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it.

Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement.

We are of the firm belief that mortgage lenders should not request an EWS1 form as a requirement to lend on buildings under 11 metres tall, but whether they do so remains their commercial decision and is subject to their individual lending criteria.

Flats: Mortgages
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Thursday 15th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, how his Department ensures lenders comply with guidance that EWS1 forms are not required for buildings under 11 metres.

Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Ten major banks and building societies have signed the lenders’ statement on cladding. These lenders have committed to consider mortgage applications for buildings over 11 metres tall, even if a property has building safety issues, provided either the building has funding for works from government or the developer, or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act, and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it.

Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement.

We are of the firm belief that mortgage lenders should not request an EWS1 form as a requirement to lend on buildings under 11 metres tall, but whether they do so remains their commercial decision and is subject to their individual lending criteria.

Flats: Mortgages
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Thursday 15th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what support or enforcement the Department can provide where lenders block transactions contrary to fire safety guidance.

Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Ten major banks and building societies have signed the lenders’ statement on cladding. These lenders have committed to consider mortgage applications for buildings over 11 metres tall, even if a property has building safety issues, provided either the building has funding for works from government or the developer, or the property is protected by the leaseholder protections in the Building Safety Act, and the leaseholder has completed a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ to evidence it.

Officials in my department engage with lenders individually should we receive evidence to suggest a signatory is not upholding the statement.

We are of the firm belief that mortgage lenders should not request an EWS1 form as a requirement to lend on buildings under 11 metres tall, but whether they do so remains their commercial decision and is subject to their individual lending criteria.

Highway Code: Publicity
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Wednesday 21st January 2026

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is planning to take to ensure that any changes to the Highway Code are (a) effectively communicated to road users and (b) enforced.

Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury

On 7 January 2026, we published our new Road Safety Strategy, setting out our vision for a safer future on our roads for all. Alongside the strategy, 5 consultations were launched.

Following the consultations, the Department will review the Highway Code and consider what amendments may be appropriate.

Enforcement of the law is a matter for the police who will decide on the evidence of each individual case, whether an offence has been committed and the appropriate action to take.

Highway Code: Reviews
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Wednesday 21st January 2026

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which specific sections of the Highway Code are under review to improve safety for (a) pedestrians, (b) cyclists, (c) motorcyclists and (d) other vulnerable road users.

Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury

In January 2022, the Department updated The Highway Code to improve the safety of pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders, including the introduction of a hierarchy of road users.

On 7 January 2026, we published our new Road Safety Strategy, setting out our vision for a safer future on our roads for all. As set out in the strategy, more work is needed to continue embedding these changes and overall awareness of the Highway Code. We are considering options in this area, and further details will be shared in due course.

Highway Code
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
Wednesday 21st January 2026

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps her Department is taking to update the Highway Code to reflect the new road safety strategy.

Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury

On 7 January 2026, we published our new Road Safety Strategy, setting out our vision for a safer future on our roads for all. Alongside the strategy, 5 consultations were launched.

Following the consultations, the Department will review the Highway Code and consider what amendments may be appropriate.



MP Financial Interests
5th January 2026
Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West)
4. Visits outside the UK
International visit to Qatar between 05 December 2025 and 14 December 2025
Source



Naz Shah mentioned

Deposited Papers
Friday 23rd January 2026
Department for Work and Pensions
Source Page: I. Annual review of the Cold Weather Payment scheme 2023/24, 2024/25 and 2025/26 (3 docs). II. Letters dated 15/10/2025 to MPs from Torsten Bell MP informing them that some postcodes in their constituencies have been linked to new weather stations, following Met Office recommendations in the 2024-25 CWP Annual Report. (20 docs) III. Letter dated 06/01/2026 from Torsten Bell MP to the Deposited Papers Clerk regarding documents for deposit in the House Libraries. 1p.
Document: 260106_Library_deposit_letter.pdf (PDF)

Found: Payments MP letters 2024-25 Keir Mather MP, Kim Leadbeater MP, Marie Tidball MP, Mark Sewards MP, Naz Shah

Friday 23rd January 2026
Department for Work and Pensions
Source Page: I. Annual review of the Cold Weather Payment scheme 2023/24, 2024/25 and 2025/26 (3 docs). II. Letters dated 15/10/2025 to MPs from Torsten Bell MP informing them that some postcodes in their constituencies have been linked to new weather stations, following Met Office recommendations in the 2024-25 CWP Annual Report. (20 docs) III. Letter dated 06/01/2026 from Torsten Bell MP to the Deposited Papers Clerk regarding documents for deposit in the House Libraries. 1p.
Document: CWP_2025_NazShahMP.pdf (PDF)

Found: ministers@dwp.gov.uk HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ Naz Shah