Information between 25th January 2026 - 6th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - British Indian Ocean Territory - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 284 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 108 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 358 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 90 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 286 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 84 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 280 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 273 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 270 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 272 |
|
24 Feb 2026 - Online Harm: Child Protection - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 279 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Naz Shah speeches from: Middle East
Naz Shah contributed 1 speech (108 words) Monday 2nd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Naz Shah speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Naz Shah contributed 2 speeches (74 words) Tuesday 24th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Cats
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West) Tuesday 27th January 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment her Department has made of the potential merits of (a) requiring free-roaming cats to be neutered and (b) supporting animal rescue centres with the costs associated with unneutered cats. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government has no plans to require free-roaming cats to be neutered.
The Government will continue to engage with animal welfare stakeholders including rescues to understand issues and trends in relation to cats. |
|
Children: Social Services
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West) Tuesday 27th January 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she is taking to help tackle regional variations in disabled children’s social care in the context of the publication of the Law Commission’s report on 16 September 2025. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The Law Commission published its final report on 16 September 2025 following a department commissioned review in April 2023 of the legal framework for disabled children’s social care. The report makes 40 recommendations, which we are now considering, with a focus on simplifying and strengthening the system to better support disabled children and their families. In line with the protocol agreed between the Lord Chancellor and the Law Commission, the department must provide an initial response within six months and a full response within one year, setting out which recommendations will be accepted, rejected or modified, and any implementation timeline. As we prepare our formal response to the Law Commission, we believe the national rollout of Family Help, a seamless, non-stigmatising offer of support delivered by multi-disciplinary, community-based teams, is already beginning to address the intended outcomes of the report and reduce regional variations. This includes special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) trained professionals as leading practitioners. Through Family Help, we are taking steps to remove the stigma from asking for help, with more SEND professionals available in integrated front doors for families to access practical support without judgement unnecessarily burdensome assessments.
|
|
Children: Social Services
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West) Tuesday 27th January 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she plans to accept the recommendations of the Law Commission’s report on disabled children’s social care, published on 16 September 2025. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The Law Commission published its final report on 16 September 2025 following a department commissioned review in April 2023 of the legal framework for disabled children’s social care. The report makes 40 recommendations, which we are now considering, with a focus on simplifying and strengthening the system to better support disabled children and their families. In line with the protocol agreed between the Lord Chancellor and the Law Commission, the department must provide an initial response within six months and a full response within one year, setting out which recommendations will be accepted, rejected or modified, and any implementation timeline. As we prepare our formal response to the Law Commission, we believe the national rollout of Family Help, a seamless, non-stigmatising offer of support delivered by multi-disciplinary, community-based teams, is already beginning to address the intended outcomes of the report and reduce regional variations. This includes special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) trained professionals as leading practitioners. Through Family Help, we are taking steps to remove the stigma from asking for help, with more SEND professionals available in integrated front doors for families to access practical support without judgement unnecessarily burdensome assessments.
|
|
Palliative Care: Children
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of funding for children’s palliative care services in Bradford West; and what steps the Modern Service Framework for palliative and end of life care is taking to address funding challenges faced by the sector. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government recognises the vital role that children’s palliative care services play in supporting children and young people with life-limiting conditions and their families, including in Bradford West. Integrated care boards (ICBs), including the NHS West Yorkshire ICB, are responsible for assessing and commissioning palliative care and end of life care services that meet the needs of their local populations. To support ICBs in this duty, NHS England has published statutory guidance and service specifications. The statutory guidance states that ICBs must work to ensure that there is sufficient provision of care services to meet the needs of their local populations, which can include hospice services available within the ICB catchment. Although commissioning decisions are made locally, we continue to support the children’s hospice sector nationally. We are providing £26 million revenue funding to children and young people’s hospices in 2025/26, of which children and young people’s hospices in Bradford West are receiving £1,727,000. We are also pleased to confirm the continuation of this funding, with approximately £80 million, adjusted for inflation, to be allocated over the next three financial years to children and young people’s hospices, giving them greater stability to plan ahead and focus on delivering high-quality, personalised care. In addition, eligible hospices are benefitting from the Government’s £125 million capital investment to improve care environments for both adult and children’s hospices across England, of which children and young people’s hospices in Bradford West are receiving £1,278,935. The Government is also developing a Palliative Care and End of Life Care Modern Service Framework (MSF) for England, planned for publication later this year. The MSF will support ICBs, including the NHS West Yorkshire ICB, to commission palliative care and end of life care more strategically by addressing the drivers of variation in access, quality and sustainability. It will help move the sector away from grant and block contract model towards clearer, more sustainable commissioning arrangements, enabling services, including those that support children, to plan with greater certainty. |
|
Protective Security for Mosques Scheme
Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West) Thursday 26th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in relation to the Mosque Security Funding Scheme (a) how many mosques have applied for funding; (b) how many applications are currently pending; (c) how many applications have been granted; and (d) how many applications have been awaiting a decision for longer than 12 months. Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) This Government is committed to protecting the right of individuals to freely practise their religion at their chosen place of worship, and to ensuring that our streets and communities remain safe. That is why up to £40 million will be available through the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme in 2026/27. The scheme provides protective security measures (such as security personnel services, CCTV, intruder alarms and secure perimeter fencing) to mosques, Muslim faith schools and associated Muslim faith community centres. To safeguard the integrity of the scheme and ensure the continued protection of vulnerable sites, the Home Office does not publish the total number of successful applications or the timeline for applications. Disclosure of this information could inadvertently reveal sensitive details about specific communities and their security needs. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
30 Jan 2026, 4:39 p.m. - House of Lords "without a vote in the other place tabled by Naz Shah MP. This " Baroness Campbell of Surbiton (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Feb 2026, 12:05 p.m. - House of Commons " And Naz Shah. >> Thank you. >> Mr. Speaker. The ten year health. measures. >> To make the healthy choice the " Ashley Dalton MP, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Health and Social Care (West Lancashire, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Feb 2026, 12:05 p.m. - House of Commons " Naz Shah. thank the Minister for that in Bradford West, more than 1 in 5 children are beginning primary " Naz Shah MP (Bradford West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
5 Mar 2026, 2:11 p.m. - House of Commons "battlefield. One lady, who often people forget about a woman called Noah Law Naz Shah Inayat Khan, who " Yasmin Qureshi MP (Bolton South and Walkden, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
195 speeches (50,468 words) Committee stage Friday 27th February 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated - Life peer) I thought of that, because I remember in Committee in the other place, Naz Shah, the Labour MP, made - Link to Speech |
|
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
189 speeches (44,534 words) Committee stage Friday 30th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: None Ms Roff has drawn my attention to Commons Amendment 14, tabled by Naz Shah MP in the other place, which - Link to Speech |