To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Digital Technology: Children
Friday 12th June 2026

Asked by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she plans to take to tackle the (a) algorithmic and (b) design features that maximise children's engagement.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

Protecting children online is a priority for the Secretary of State and this government. The Online Safety Act provides strong foundations for protecting children across the UK. We have always been clear that we will build on that foundation and published a consultation and national conversation which sought views and evidence from people across the UK on measures that could further protect children online and enhance their wellbeing. As part of this, we sought views on how platform design features such as personal recommender systems may encourage children to stay online for longer. The consultation closed on 26 May 2026, and the government will respond by summer.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 11 Jun 2026
Business of the House

"On 21 May, the Government laid the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s draft code of practice for services, public functions and associations before the House. Since then, a litany of trans-led organisations, human rights groups, charities and trade unions have come out in opposition, citing the harm it poses to …..."
Nadia Whittome - View Speech

View all Nadia Whittome (Lab - Nottingham East) contributions to the debate on: Business of the House

Written Question
Asylum: Death
Wednesday 10th June 2026

Asked by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of the report 'Deaths of unaccompanied asylum-seeking young people in the care of, or supported by, local authorities' by Da’aro Youth Project.

Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office)

We welcome the report of the Da’aro Youth Project. The Home Secretary engages regularly with ministerial colleagues across government on a range of issues relating to asylum, including safeguarding and the welfare of vulnerable individuals.

Last month, the Department for Education (DfE) launched a review into care leaver deaths, and deaths of young people who were unaccompanied asylum seeking children are being considered as part of this. Insights from the review will be shared later this year and will inform how DfE improve the support provided to care experienced young people across all aspects of their lives – including those who were unaccompanied asylum-seeking children

The Home Office works closely with the Department for Education at both ministerial and official level to support effective safeguarding arrangements and share information on risks affecting asylum seekers.

Where an individual is in the care of a local authority as a looked after child under its statutory duties in the Children Act 1989, that authority is responsible for considering and addressing all relevant matters linked to those duties, including risk assessment and safeguarding.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 09 Jun 2026
Oral Answers to Questions

"T4. We all know that social care is in crisis, with huge staff shortages, unmet needs and councils’ finances being pushed to the brink, so it is disappointing that the King’s Speech did not contain anything on social care. Given that the full Casey review is not expected until 2028 …..."
Nadia Whittome - View Speech

View all Nadia Whittome (Lab - Nottingham East) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
9 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 86
Division Vote (Commons)
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 275 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 287
Division Vote (Commons)
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 274 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 297
Division Vote (Commons)
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 275 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 290
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 257
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 145 Noes - 251