To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 266
Written Question
Antisemitism: Curriculum
Thursday 4th June 2026

Asked by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of making education on antisemitism mandatory in schools.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

There is no place for antisemitism in our society.

The department supports teachers through our Educate Against Hate website, which provides teachers with a range of free, quality-assured resources, including on building resilience to antisemitism, teaching about tolerance and rejecting discrimination.

The department has committed £7 million to fund projects and programmes to improve confidence and resilience in tackling antisemitism in education. My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education has also asked Sir David Bell to undertake an independent review into antisemitism in schools and colleges, which will be published this autumn.


Written Question
Immigration: Applications
Wednesday 3rd June 2026

Asked by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, for what reason applications for Indefinite Leave to Remain under the European Community Association Agreement (ECAA) route are subject to delays, including the processing times and backlogs of UK Visas and Immigration; and, with reference to her Department's document entitled Restoring control over the immigration system: white paper, published on 12 May 2025, whether proposed changes to settlement rules will apply to existing ECAA applicants.

Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)

The volume of applications for Indefinite Leave to Remain under the ECAA route has increased significantly over the last twelve months; with applications received currently 65% above forecasted intake.

Applications are routinely accompanied by exceptionally large volumes of supporting evidence which must be reviewed and considered to ensure lawful and robust outcomes are reached.

To address the delays currently being experienced additional resource has been assigned to this area and the Home Office expect to see increasing output and quicker turnarounds throughout the second half of 2026 as that takes effect.

A public consultation on proposed changes to settlement rules ran for 12 weeks, from 20 November 2025 until 12 February 2026, to gather views on proposed changes. The Home Office are now reviewing and analysing all responses received, which will help inform the development of the final earned settlement model, including consideration of any potential exemptions or transitional measures for those already on a pathway to settlement. Once the final model has been decided, the Government will communicate the outcome publicly.  As with all significant policy changes, the proposals will be subject to both economic impact assessments and equality impact assessments.


Written Question
Iron and Steel: Imports
Wednesday 3rd June 2026

Asked by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment he has made the potential impact of the proposed steel trade measure on the adequacy of the range and supply of products that are not currently domestically manufactured; and what steps he is taking to support domestic firms currently reliant on imported steel products or components.

Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The measure has been designed to strike the right balance between securing the future of domestic steelmaking while maintaining secure supply chains for downstream users. The measure only covers steel requirements that can be met in the UK. In some instances, this is not feasible for technical reasons. Where this is the case, quotas have been designed to allow for sufficient imports to ensure these goods continue to be available to UK downstream users without unnecessary additional costs.

The Government has engaged extensively with manufacturers and wider industry to inform the design of the new steel trade measure, including through ongoing discussions and a Call for Evidence in 2025. We will keep the measure under review, including a review after twelve months to ensure it remains effective and fit for purpose.

To ease short term impacts, we will introduce a transitional arrangement under which the new measure would not apply to goods agreed under contract before 14 March 2026 and imported between 1 July and 30 September 2026.

The Steel Strategy aims to create a more competitive landscape for steel production in the UK, to enable companies to use more domestic content and reduce their dependency on imports.


Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 298
Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 371
Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 302
Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Nadia Whittome (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 301
Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 01 Jun 2026
Equality Act 2010: Code of Practice

"The EHRC code of practice fails everyone. It effectively pushes trans people out of public life, it subjects all women to gender policing based on stereotypes, and it does not provide clarity to organisations that want to be trans-inclusive. For example, a charity that wants to put on a women’s …..."
Nadia Whittome - View Speech

View all Nadia Whittome (Lab - Nottingham East) contributions to the debate on: Equality Act 2010: Code of Practice

Early Day Motion
Draft Code of Practice on Services, public functions and associations (134 Signatures)
1 Jun 2026
Tabled by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East)
That the draft Code of Practice for Services, public functions and associations, a copy of which was laid before this House on 21 May, be disapproved.