Mike Wood

Labour - Former Member for Batley and Spen

First elected: 1st May 1997

Left House: 30th March 2015 (Retired)


Mike Wood is not a member of any APPGs
Procedure Committee
26th Jul 2010 - 1st Mar 2011
Broadcasting
1st Jun 1997 - 1st Jun 1998


Division Voting information

Mike Wood has voted in 962 divisions, and 68 times against the majority of their Party.

27 Oct 2014 - Recall of MPs Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 41 Labour Aye votes vs 162 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 340
26 Sep 2014 - Iraq: Coalition Against ISIL - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour No votes vs 190 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 524 Noes - 43
26 Mar 2014 - Charter for Budget Responsibility - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 201 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 520 Noes - 22
3 Jun 2013 - Energy Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 208 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 20 Noes - 503
18 Mar 2013 - Crime and Courts Bill [Lords] (Programme) ((No. 3) - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 214 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 40 Noes - 508
5 Feb 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 22 Labour No votes vs 216 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 175
5 Feb 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour No votes vs 225 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 499 Noes - 55
28 Jan 2013 - Succession to the Crown Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 17 Labour Aye votes vs 154 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 38 Noes - 371
24 Oct 2011 - National Referendum on the European Union - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 214 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 111 Noes - 483
13 Oct 2011 - Procedure Committee Reports - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 56 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 63 Noes - 206
30 Mar 2011 - Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 33 Labour Aye votes vs 170 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 37 Noes - 480
21 Mar 2011 - United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 211 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 557 Noes - 13
1 Mar 2010 - Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour No votes vs 198 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 206 Noes - 85
20 Jan 2010 - Fiscal Responsibility Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour No votes vs 255 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 197
10 Nov 2009 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 22 Labour No votes vs 278 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 236
21 Oct 2009 - Equitable Life - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Labour Aye votes vs 287 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 294
7 Jul 2009 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 16 Labour Aye votes vs 295 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 311
1 Jul 2009 - Parliamentary Standards Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 24 Labour No votes vs 239 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 250
24 Jun 2009 - Iraq Inquiry - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 288 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 299
20 May 2009 - Planning: National Policy Statements - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Labour Aye votes vs 254 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 262
19 May 2009 - Policing and Crime Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour Aye votes vs 274 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 284
19 May 2009 - Policing and Crime Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Labour Aye votes vs 272 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 285
30 Apr 2009 - Members’ Allowances - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Labour No votes vs 225 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 355 Noes - 39
30 Apr 2009 - Members’ Allowances - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 231 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 31
30 Apr 2009 - Members’ Allowances - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour No votes vs 210 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 100
30 Apr 2009 - Members’ Allowances - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour No votes vs 221 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 22
29 Apr 2009 - Gurkha Settlement Rights - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 28 Labour Aye votes vs 238 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 246
25 Mar 2009 - Iraq War Inquiry - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 287 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 303
25 Mar 2009 - Iraq War Inquiry - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Labour No votes vs 285 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 265
17 Mar 2009 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 29 Labour Aye votes vs 251 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 408
17 Mar 2009 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour Aye votes vs 250 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 396
17 Mar 2009 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 30 Labour Aye votes vs 247 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 260
24 Feb 2009 - Airport Expansion (Parliamentary Approval) - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 23 Labour Aye votes vs 193 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 203
19 Nov 2008 - Counter-Terrorism Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 271 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 329
22 Oct 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] (Programme) (No. 2) - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour No votes vs 263 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 157
22 Oct 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 47 Labour Aye votes vs 226 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 306
25 Jun 2008 - Planning Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 16 Labour Aye votes vs 294 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 303
25 Jun 2008 - Planning Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 297 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 306
11 Jun 2008 - New Clause 22 - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 37 Labour No votes vs 292 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 306
11 Jun 2008 - New Clause 22 - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 26 Labour No votes vs 292 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 294
10 Jun 2008 - Counter-Terrorism Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Labour Aye votes vs 310 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 320
10 Jun 2008 - Counter-Terrorism Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 300 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 310
10 Jun 2008 - Counter-Terrorism Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 309 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 331
20 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 48 Labour Aye votes vs 227 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 290
20 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 42 Labour Aye votes vs 229 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 309
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 62 Labour Aye votes vs 216 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 286
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 23 Labour Aye votes vs 233 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 318
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 51 Labour Aye votes vs 216 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 293
12 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour No votes vs 250 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 149
22 Apr 2008 - Pensions Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 261 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 269
19 Mar 2008 - Post Office Closures - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 279 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 288
5 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 28 Labour Aye votes vs 299 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 311
4 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour Aye votes vs 273 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 329
21 Jan 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Labour No votes vs 298 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 224
18 Apr 2007 - Pensions Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 273 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 282
14 Mar 2007 - Trident - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 94 Labour Aye votes vs 226 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 413
14 Mar 2007 - Trident - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 89 Labour No votes vs 222 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 409 Noes - 161
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Labour Aye votes vs 157 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 267
28 Feb 2007 - Offender Management Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 49 Labour Aye votes vs 256 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 111 Noes - 267
28 Feb 2007 - Offender Management Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour No votes vs 283 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 268
25 Jan 2007 - Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 273 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 246
11 Dec 2006 - Offender Management Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 27 Labour No votes vs 265 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 411 Noes - 91
11 Dec 2006 - Offender Management Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Labour No votes vs 271 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 213
29 Nov 2006 - Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 276 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 219
31 Oct 2006 - Iraq - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Labour Aye votes vs 288 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 298
31 Oct 2006 - Iraq - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour No votes vs 284 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 264
24 Oct 2006 - Police and Justice Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour No votes vs 311 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 263
24 Oct 2006 - Police and Justice Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour No votes vs 304 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 272
View All Mike Wood Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Jo Swinson (Liberal Democrat)
(10 debate interactions)
David Burrowes (Conservative)
(3 debate interactions)
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
(3 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Ministry of Justice
(15 debate contributions)
Department for Education
(8 debate contributions)
HM Treasury
(3 debate contributions)
Cabinet Office
(3 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Mike Wood has not made any spoken contributions to legislative debate
View all Mike Wood's debates

Latest EDMs signed by Mike Wood

17th March 2015
Mike Wood signed this EDM on Friday 20th March 2015

INDIA'S DAUGHTER AND ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

Tabled by: Jeremy Corbyn (Independent - Islington North)
That this House notes the very powerful effect of Leslee Udwin's documentary, India's Daughter, inspired by the Indian peoples' response to the gang rape of a 23 year old medical student, Jyoti Singh, as demonstrated by the resulting month-long protests of men and women from all walks of life; further …
60 signatures
(Most recent: 25 Mar 2015)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 17
Independent: 4
Conservative: 3
The Independent Group for Change: 2
Democratic Unionist Party: 2
Plaid Cymru: 1
Green Party: 1
5th March 2015
Mike Wood signed this EDM on Friday 20th March 2015

PARTIAL UPRATING FOR FROZEN PENSIONS

Tabled by: Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat - North Devon)
That this House notes with concern the situation faced by 550,000 British pensioners living overseas, primarily in Commonwealth countries, who are currently deprived of annual state pension uprating adjustments by the Government's frozen pension policy; believes that there is a positive incremental solution of partial uprating, involving introducing annual uprating …
52 signatures
(Most recent: 25 Mar 2015)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 11
Conservative: 8
Independent: 3
Green Party: 1
The Independent Group for Change: 1
Democratic Unionist Party: 1
Plaid Cymru: 1
Scottish National Party: 1
View All Mike Wood's signed Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Mike Wood, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


Mike Wood has not been granted any Urgent Questions

3 Adjournment Debates led by Mike Wood

Monday 24th March 2014
Thursday 13th October 2011
Tuesday 30th November 2010

Mike Wood has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Mike Wood has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 16 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
1 Other Department Questions
2nd Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many (a) external and (b) Civil Service appointees have worked in ministerial offices in his Department (i) since May 2010 and (ii) between May 2005 and May 2010.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) currently has 9 Ministers, 7 of whom share offices with other Government Departments. There are no external appointees currently working in BIS ministerial offices. The total number of civil service appointed Private Office staff as at 6 January 2015 is 33.

BIS is unable to provide any historic data due to changes to the HR systems.

23rd Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the effect on child poverty of the introduction of child maintenance service charges.

I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne North, Catherine McKinnell, on 13 October 2014 to Question UIN 208928.

23rd Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the gender impact of the introduction of child maintenance service charges.

The assessment of the gender impact of fees and charges for the new Child Maintenance Service was published in the Equality Impact Assessment for the Child Support Fees Regulations 2013. This is available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220219/eia-child-support-fees.pdf.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what response his Department plans to make to the findings and recommendations of the All-Party Parliamentary Hepatology Group's recent report into liver disease, Today's Complacency, Tomorrow's Catastrophe, published on 25 March 2014; and if he will make a statement.

Improving outcomes for people with liver disease is a priority and tackling it is reflected in the NHS Outcomes Framework, the Public Health Outcomes Framework and in the Government's mandate to the National Health Service.

Building on last year's ‘Call to Action', Living Well for Longer: National Support for Local Action to Reduce Premature Avoidable Mortality brings together the national actions which will be taken by the Department and wider Government, NHS England and Public Health England (PHE), to reduce premature mortality in England. It focuses on the five big killers including liver disease and includes a system wide delivery plan for 2014-15. This plan reflects the key actions which will be taken to reduce premature mortality taking into account the commitments that each of these organisations have made in their 2014-15 business plan. Progress against these commitments will be tracked and reported on next year.

In addition, PHE is meeting with the All-Party Parliamentary Hepatology Group, and other stakeholders, in July to discuss the recommendations of its recent report into liver disease.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps he is taking to ensure that his Department, NHS England, Public Health England, clinical commissioning groups and local authorities co-ordinate a national approach to improving the prevention, testing, diagnosis and treatment of Hepatitis C.

Public Health England is currently working with NHS England and other partners to reduce the burden of disease from hepatitis C through a suite of activities to improve awareness, prevention, testing and diagnosis, referral into care, and treatment outcomes. The Department is supportive of this work, and is helping to facilitate it.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the feasibility of effectively eliminating Hepatitis C in the UK in the next 15 to 20 years.

Public Health England (PHE) is committed to working with NHS England and other partners to reduce the burden of disease from hepatitis C through a suite of activities to improve awareness, prevention, testing and diagnosis, referral into care, and treatment outcomes

The feasibility of elimination – that is the reduction to zero of the incidence of disease or infection in England - has not been formally assessed and it is likely to be difficult in the absence of an effective vaccine. However, PHE has recently completed modelling work to assess the potential impact of increased uptake and new therapies on reducing the future burden of hepatitis C-related end stage liver disease in England. This work is being finalised and will be published shortly.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of progress in reducing avoidable deaths from liver disease as set out in his call to action to reduce avoidable premature mortality; and what further steps his Department will be taking.

Improving outcomes for people with liver disease is a priority and tackling it is reflected in the NHS Outcomes Framework, the Public Health Outcomes Framework and in the Government's mandate to the National Health Service.

Building on last year's ‘Call to Action', Living Well for Longer: National Support for Local Action to Reduce Premature Avoidable Mortality brings together the national actions which will be taken by the Department and wider Government, NHS England and Public Health England (PHE), to reduce premature mortality in England. It focuses on the five big killers including liver disease and includes a system wide delivery plan for 2014-15. This plan reflects the key actions which will be taken to reduce premature mortality taking into account the commitments that each of these organisations have made in their 2014-15 business plan. Progress against these commitments will be tracked and reported on next year.

In addition, PHE is meeting with the All-Party Parliamentary Hepatology Group, and other stakeholders, in July to discuss the recommendations of its recent report into liver disease.

15th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many visa applications are presently deferred or on hold awaiting the outcome of the legal action in respect of the financial requirement that is presently before the courts.

According to Home Office management information, as at 31 March 2014, 3,134 family visa applications were on hold following the July 2013 High Court judgment in MM & Others.Following the Court of Appeal ruling in favour of the Home Secretary which confirmed the lawfulness of the income threshold policy, as a rational and reasonable means of achieving the legitimate aims of reducing taxpayer burdens and promoting integration, from 28 July, the individuals whose applications were on hold, pending this judgment, will now receive a decision. Decisions will take account of all the information presented. Any application which met all the requirements apart from the minimum income threshold now stands to be refused. The applications which have been subject to the hold will be decided as soon as possible. It is likely to take several weeks to complete this work. Overseas our regions are rebalancing resources to ensure decisions are made as quickly as they reasonably can be, allowing full consideration of the facts of the cases. This is with the aim of resolving all applications within three months in line with service standards for settlement applications.

15th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the average time taken was for a spouse visa appeal to be heard from the time of being refused to a decision by the tribunal in each of the last five years.

The information could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.

15th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the average time taken was for a decision on a visa application in each category in (a) Mumbai and (b) Islamabad in the most recent period for which figures are available.

The table aside sets out the average time taken in days for decisions to be made on visa applications considered in Mumbai and Islamabad between 1st January and 31st March 2014, by category of application.

Endorsement category

Post | Days

ISLAMABAD

MUMBAI

EEA Family Permits

12.5

10.8

Family Visit

30.2

5.4

Other Non Settlement

16.7

5

Other Visitor

8.2

4.8

PBS Tier 1

12.7

10.7

PBS Tier 2

13.9

4.4

PBS Tier 4

14.2

10.4

PBS Tier 5

9.1

18.5

Settlement

73

29.9

Transit

14

3.2

Average decision times for visas processed in Mumbai and Islamabad (1st January and 31st March 2014). A decision is where the application has been issued, refused, lapsed or withdrawn

15th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the average time taken was from a visa appeal being granted at tribunal to the post issuing the visa in (a) Mumbai and (b) Islamabad in the most recent period for which figures are available.

From 1st January to 31st March 2014, it took on average 34 days in Mumbai and 31 days in Islamabad to issue a visa after the tribunal decision was received in the respective post.

15th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much has been spent by her Department on legal representation and court costs in respect of action over the financial requirement.

In the case of MM & Others concerning the minimum income threshold under the family Immigration Rules, the costs incurred by the Home Office as at 3 July 2014 were approximately £163,000.

15th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what process the civilian police must follow when attempting to arrest, summons or charge a serving member of the armed forces in connection with indictable offences.

If a member of the UK Armed Forces is arrested and detained in police custody for a recordable offence, the custody sergeant is responsible for notifying the circumstances of arrest, detention and offence to the relevant service authorities.

Civilian criminal courts and service tribunals have concurrent jurisdiction to deal with accused persons who are subject to military law. The decision on which jurisdiction prosecutes a person subject to military law is a matter of consultation between all police agencies involved in the investigation in consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service and Service Prosecutions Authority.

15th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many serving military personnel have been arrested and charged with indictable offences by civilian police forces in each of the last five years.

The information requested is not collected centrally by the Home Office. Aggregated data on arrests supplied to the Home Office do not include information about whether persons arrested were serving military personnel.

15th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the average time taken was by each arm of the Armed Forces to make serving personnel available to the civilian police in connection with criminal investigations in the most recent period for which figures are available; and how many approaches the civilian police have made to the Armed Forces for access to serving personnel in relation to indictable offences.

This information is not held in the format requested. The civil police are not required to seek the assistance or permission of relevant arms of the Armed Forces in relation to serving personnel being made available in connection with criminal investigations. However, if such an approach is made, then the Service authorities will attempt to assist as far as they are able so to do.