Debates between Mike Kane and Tom Blenkinsop during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Finance (No.2) Bill

Debate between Mike Kane and Tom Blenkinsop
Tuesday 8th April 2014

(10 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tom Blenkinsop Portrait Tom Blenkinsop
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my hon. Friend agree that a review would be important? A corporation tax cut would be welcomed by the business community, but it is not the priority in certain sectors. For example, energy-intensive industries are more concerned about capital allowances—the Government have had to U-turn on getting rid of them—and the carbon price floor, which affects the chemical and steel industries.

Mike Kane Portrait Mike Kane
- Hansard - -

I agree with my hon. Friend. Government Members have said that amendment 2 would create uncertainty, but if the Committee agreed to it and to a review, businesses would welcome it, because a review would be part of the ongoing debate.

The amendment would require the Government to publish a report on the impact of the planned cut in corporation tax in the 2015-16 financial year from 21p to 20p. The amendment calls for the assessment of the impact specifically on SMEs.