Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Oral Answers to Questions

Mike Amesbury Excerpts
Monday 10th July 2017

(7 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tobias Ellwood Portrait Mr Ellwood
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I welcome the hon. Gentleman to his place and to the Dispatch Box. He is right to raise that issue. I have just inherited this brief, and there has been concern about standards, in which the Secretary of State has taken a personal interest. We are ensuring that performance levels are up to par, and there will be an opportunity to renegotiate the contract in 2021.

Mike Amesbury Portrait Mike Amesbury (Weaver Vale) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

7. What recent discussions he has had with the Armed Forces Pay Review Body on levels of pay for the armed forces.

Michael Fallon Portrait The Secretary of State for Defence (Sir Michael Fallon)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Ministers are in regular contact with the Armed Forces Pay Review Body as part of the annual pay round process. I gave oral evidence to the review body last November prior to its 2017 report, and I expect to meet it again prior to its 2018 report.

Mike Amesbury Portrait Mike Amesbury
- Hansard - -

Given that every Minister, including the Defence Secretary, voted against lifting the pay cap, does that not prove that their praise is more hollow words than good deeds?

Michael Fallon Portrait Sir Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We all want to see people in public service, including in the armed forces, properly remunerated for what they do, but any pay settlement must obviously take account of taxpayers’ interests and be fair to our need to get our deficit under control. We are advised by an independent pay review body that, unlike some other pay review bodies, it is specifically required to look at comparability with the civilian sector and to take account of any evidence regarding recruitment and retention.