Information between 18th November 2025 - 8th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 327 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 105 |
|
19 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 92 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Telecommunications - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 309 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 321 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 347 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 340 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 350 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 303 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 304 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 298 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 299 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Michael Wheeler speeches from: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill
Michael Wheeler contributed 1 speech (470 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 18th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Animal Experiments
Asked by: Michael Wheeler (Labour - Worsley and Eccles) Thursday 4th December 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to her Department’s publication entitled Replacing animals in science: A strategy to support the development, validation and uptake of alternative methods, published on 11 November 2025, what steps she is taking to end the use of the LD50 and LC50 tests. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Strategy uses a ‘baskets’ approach to group animal tests according to how ready they are for replacement, based on the maturity of potential alternative methods. These initial baskets are not exhaustive and will be reviewed and refined in consultation with the research community on a regular basis, noting that two LD/LC50 tests are already in basket 1 and 2 (botulinum potency and fish acute toxicity tests respectively) meaning they are among the first targeted for phase-out. In addition, the Government-funded National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) has ongoing work to replace, reduce and refine LD/LC50 tests. |
|
Animal Experiments
Asked by: Michael Wheeler (Labour - Worsley and Eccles) Thursday 4th December 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to her Department’s publication entitled Replacing animals in science: A strategy to support the development, validation and uptake of alternative methods, published on 11 November 2025, if she will consider including all instances of the use of the LD50 and LC50 tests in Basket 1: Animal testing/models for which mature replacement technologies already exist and could be applied to phase out in all but exceptional circumstances. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Strategy uses a ‘baskets’ approach to group animal tests according to how ready they are for replacement, based on the maturity of potential alternative methods. These initial baskets are not exhaustive and will be reviewed and refined in consultation with the research community on a regular basis, noting that two LD/LC50 tests are already in basket 1 and 2 (botulinum potency and fish acute toxicity tests respectively) meaning they are among the first targeted for phase-out. In addition, the Government-funded National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) has ongoing work to replace, reduce and refine LD/LC50 tests. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
18 Nov 2025, 5:13 p.m. - House of Commons "from ourselves who chose to send them here? >> Michael Wheeler. >> Madam Deputy Speaker, I'm going " Rt Hon Tom Tugendhat MP (Tonbridge, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Iconic Trees and Nature Education
2 speeches (1,483 words) Monday 1st December 2025 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Joe Morris (Lab - Hexham) protected and never consigned to memory alone.Question put and agreed to.Ordered,That Joe Morris, Michael Wheeler - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Oral Evidence - Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Kelly Foy; Tracy Gilbert; Gurinder Singh Josan; John Lamont; Lee Pitcher; Kenneth Stevenson; Michael Wheeler |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Oral Evidence - The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Kelly Foy; Tracy Gilbert; Gurinder Singh Josan; John Lamont; Lee Pitcher; Kenneth Stevenson; Michael Wheeler |
|
Wednesday 26th November 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-11-26 09:00:00+00:00 Matter referred on 4 September 2025: actions of the Charity Commission - Committee of Privileges Found: the meeting Members present: Alberto Costa (Chair); Paula Barker; Gill Furniss; Gareth Snell; Michael Wheeler |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Graeme Downie; Mary Kelly Foy; Tracy Gilbert; Gurinder Singh Josan; John Lamont; Lee Pitcher; Michael Wheeler |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 10 a.m. Committee on Standards - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026 9:45 a.m. Committee on Standards - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Leader of the House At 10:15am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP - Leader of the House at House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 17th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
4 Sep 2025
Matter referred on 4 September 2025: actions of the Charity Commission Committee of Privileges (Select) Not accepting submissions On the 4 September 2025 the House agreed the following Resolution: The matter of the actions of the Charity Commission in bringing legal proceedings that would prevent the laying of a report before this House be referred to the Committee of Privileges. |
|
24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions Procedure Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication. Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform. |