Michael Wheeler Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Michael Wheeler

Information between 8th November 2025 - 18th November 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context
Michael Wheeler voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 305 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318


Speeches
Michael Wheeler speeches from: Business of the House
Michael Wheeler contributed 1 speech (112 words)
Thursday 13th November 2025 - Commons Chamber
Leader of the House


Written Answers
Children: Poverty
Asked by: Michael Wheeler (Labour - Worsley and Eccles)
Tuesday 11th November 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether the forthcoming Child Poverty Strategy will include specific measures to support children in deepest poverty.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

This government is committed to tackling child poverty and the Child Poverty Strategy will be published in the autumn. The publication will set out how we intend to monitor and evaluate the impacts of the strategy from this year and in future years, including understanding how this varies across the UK and for different groups. This publication will also set out how we will measure the experience of children in the most severe and acute forms of poverty.

The government has already taken action to support children in deepest poverty, for example a new £1 billion package to reform crisis support, including funding to ensure the poorest children do not go hungry outside of term time.

Children: Poverty
Asked by: Michael Wheeler (Labour - Worsley and Eccles)
Tuesday 11th November 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether the forthcoming Child Poverty Strategy will include targets on child poverty reduction.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

This government is committed to tackling child poverty, with our ambitious Child Poverty Strategy due to be published in the autumn.

The publication will set out how we intend to monitor and evaluate the impacts of the strategy from this year and in future years, including understanding how this varies across the UK and for different groups.

Animal Experiments
Asked by: Michael Wheeler (Labour - Worsley and Eccles)
Thursday 13th November 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to her Department’s publication entitled Annual statistics of scientific procedures on living animals, Great Britain 2024, published on 23 October 2025, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of the increase in the number of procedures conducted for LD50 and LC50 tests from 2023 to 2024.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

The Lethal Dose 50 and Lethal Concentration 50 procedures are subject to strict regulations under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. This legal framework requires that animals are only ever used in science where there are no alternatives, where the number of animals used is the minimum needed to achieve the scientific benefit, and where the potential harm to animals is limited to that needed to achieve the scientific benefit.

Some authorised medicines in the UK include quality control tests which require the use of animals, conducted to ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of specific medicines. These tests account for the LD50 cases still conducted.

The requirement for LD50 and LC50 tests is set by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines and the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulations set by the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.

This Government is committed to the development of non-animal alternatives and will publish a strategy by the end of this year to support the development, validation and uptake of alternatives to animal testing.

Animal Experiments: Primates
Asked by: Michael Wheeler (Labour - Worsley and Eccles)
Thursday 13th November 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to her Department’s publication entitled Annual statistics of scientific procedures on living animals, Great Britain 2024, published on 23 October 2025, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of the increase in the number of (a) marmosets and tamarins and (b) rhesus monkeys used for the first time in scientific procedures from 2023 to 2024.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

The requirements for regulatory testing are set by regulators such as the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, which regulates medicines, medical devices and blood components for transfusion in the UK.

The use of non-human primates continues to represent a very small proportion of the total number of procedures carried out in Great Britain, accounting for approximately 0.1% of all experimental procedures in 2024. The total number of procedures using non-human primates, and the total number of non-human primates used decreased in 2024 compared to 2023. Non-human primates are required by regulatory authorities for use in their assessments of whether potential medicines and other therapeutics are to be considered safe for human use. Non-human primates are also used for the safety assessment of novel pharmaceuticals in cases where they are the most appropriate and scientifically justified species.

Non-human primates are classed as specially protected species, and their use is permitted only under exceptional circumstances.

The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 ensures that all use of non-human primates in the UK is strictly regulated and licences that authorise testing on non-human primates are only granted where there is robust scientific justification and no viable alternative. Each project licence application is subject to a rigorous harm-benefit analysis, and the welfare of the animals is a primary consideration at every stage.

This Government is committed to the development of non-animal alternatives and will publish a strategy by the end of this year to support the development, validation and uptake of alternatives to animal testing.

Animal Experiments
Asked by: Michael Wheeler (Labour - Worsley and Eccles)
Thursday 13th November 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to her Department’s publication entitled Annual statistics of scientific procedures on living animals, Great Britain 2024, published on 23 October 2025, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of the increase in the number of procedures involving (a) fish, (b) rats and (c) horses from 2023 to 2024.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

In 2024, there were 2.64 million regulated scientific procedures carried out in Great Britain involving living animals. This is a decrease of 1% on the previous year, and the lowest number since 2001.

The trends in the number of animals and types of procedures carried out each year are influenced by a range of extraneous factors, for example requirements for research and testing which include products being brought to market.

The Home Office is responsible for regulating under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (ASPA) to assure compliance with protections afforded to animals used in science and to administrate the licensing framework. Data trends and requirements will be assessed by the authorities whom have particular responsibilities and requirements for the use of animals of science.




Michael Wheeler mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

13 Nov 2025, 11:12 a.m. - House of Commons
">> Michael Wheeler thank you, Mr. Speaker. Many of my constituents use the Warburton Toll Bridge to get to work, visit family, and go "
Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Tynemouth, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
13 Nov 2025, 11:12 a.m. - House of Commons
"may wish to draw that to the department. >> Michael Wheeler thank you, Mr. "
Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Tynemouth, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve KC, Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Ellis KBE, KC, and Sir Jeremy Wright

Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee

Found: ; Sir Christopher Chope; Mr Lee Dillon; Gurinder Singh Josan; John Lamont; Mr Tom Morrison; Michael Wheeler




Michael Wheeler - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 19th November 2025 2:30 p.m.
Procedure Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Elections within the House of Commons
At 2:45pm: Oral evidence
Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 10 a.m.
Committee on Standards - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m.
Procedure Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons
At 2:45pm: Oral evidence
The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General
At 3:30pm: Oral evidence
Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve KC, Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Ellis KBE, KC, and Sir Jeremy Wright

Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee
Friday 14th November 2025
Written Evidence - The Electoral Commission
EHC0023 - Elections within the House of Commons

Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators

Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee
Wednesday 26th November 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-11-26 09:00:00+00:00

Matter referred on 4 September 2025: actions of the Charity Commission - Committee of Privileges


Select Committee Inquiry
4 Sep 2025
Matter referred on 4 September 2025: actions of the Charity Commission
Committee of Privileges (Select)
Not accepting submissions

On the 4 September 2025 the House agreed the following Resolution:

The matter of the actions of the Charity Commission in bringing legal proceedings that would prevent the laying of a report before this House be referred to the Committee of Privileges.

24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions
Procedure Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication.

Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform.