To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Earwax: Medical Treatments
Thursday 5th February 2026

Asked by: Matt Vickers (Conservative - Stockton West)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to support Integrated Care Board’s in providing community ear wax removal services to the public.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Integrated care boards (ICBs) are responsible for commissioning local National Health Services, including ear wax removal services, and in doing so must consider how best to improve population health and achieve best value for money.

ICBs take account of relevant guidance on ear wax removal produced by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, which is available at the following link:

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng98/chapter/Recommendations


Written Question
Earwax: Medical Treatments
Thursday 5th February 2026

Asked by: Matt Vickers (Conservative - Stockton West)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to improve access to ear wax removal services in Stockton West constituency.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Integrated care boards (ICBs) are responsible for commissioning local National Health Services, including ear wax removal services, and in doing so must consider how best to improve population health and achieve best value for money.

ICBs take account of relevant guidance on ear wax removal produced by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, which is available at the following link:

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng98/chapter/Recommendations


Division Vote (Commons)
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context
Matt Vickers (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116
Written Question
Police: Demonstrations
Wednesday 4th February 2026

Asked by: Matt Vickers (Conservative - Stockton West)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department has issued guidance to the Metropolitan Police on the circumstances in which conditions that effectively prevent a protest from taking place may be imposed under sections 12 and 14 of the Public Order Act 1986 in the last 12 months.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

Sections 12 and 14 of the Public Order Act 1986 allow the police to impose conditions on public processions and public assemblies as necessary to prevent serious public disorder, serious damage to property, or serious disruption to the life of the community.

Any conditions that are necessary can be placed on the public procession or public assembly, including the location or route, time and date, or prohibiting individuals entering any public space specified.  These powers do not allow police to ban protests or prevent protests from taking place.

Decisions on how to police demonstrations are an operational matter for the police, working within the legal framework of the Public Order Act 1986.  In making these considerations, the police must always balance decisions with the right to peaceful protest.

The College of Policing is responsible for providing guidance and operational advice for frontline policing. The College of Policing produces the Public Order Public Safety authorised professional practice. Alongside this, the Protest Operational Advice Document is published jointly by the College of Policing and the National Police Chiefs’ Council.


Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 03 Feb 2026
Town and City Centre Safety

"It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Dowd. I thank the hon. Member for Derby South (Baggy Shanker) for securing this important debate.

Town and city centres are the lifeblood of our local communities. They are crucial for people, local businesses and our economy, yet under this …..."

Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: Town and City Centre Safety

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 03 Feb 2026
Town and City Centre Safety

"That brings me to Stockton, which has a great high street and incredible local businesses. I always encourage people to support Stockton, but I would be negligent in my duty if I did not acknowledge the challenges it faces—challenges that did not arrive overnight. Over decades, Stockton’s Labour council has …..."
Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: Town and City Centre Safety

Division Vote (Commons)
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Vickers (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104
Speech in Westminster Hall - Mon 02 Feb 2026
Indefinite Leave to Remain

"Thank you, Ms Lewell, for chairing the debate today.

The House has had a great many opportunities to discuss indefinite leave to remain and its impact on people, including debates in this Chamber on consequential matters such as those working in the healthcare sector and BNOs. Underpinning all these debates …..."

Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: Indefinite Leave to Remain

Speech in Westminster Hall - Mon 02 Feb 2026
Indefinite Leave to Remain

"There has been a lot of passionate debate today, and well-meaning suggestions for changes or exemptions to the Government proposals were passionately advanced. Some were related to salary, to age or to people’s grasp of the English language; some referred to people’s community contributions, to the make-up of a person’s …..."
Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: Indefinite Leave to Remain

Speech in Westminster Hall - Mon 02 Feb 2026
Indefinite Leave to Remain

"I will carry on.

Between 2015 and 2020, total grants of resettlement were never over 100,000. In the years either side of that—except in the last year of the previous Labour Government—they were never more than 200,000. In contrast, the Government’s own settlement consultation sets out estimates showing far greater …..."

Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: Indefinite Leave to Remain