Information between 10th March 2024 - 9th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 Mar 2024 - 6. Capital gains tax (reduction in higher rate for residential property gains to 24%) - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 46 |
|
12 Mar 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 43 |
|
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 293 |
|
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 41 |
|
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No.2) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 300 |
|
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No.2) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 43 |
|
13 Mar 2024 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 147 |
|
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 292 |
|
14 Mar 2024 - Asylum and Migration - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 215 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 220 |
|
14 Mar 2024 - Asylum and Migration - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 215 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 35 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 253 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 249 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 250 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 251 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 251 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 255 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 252 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 253 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 255 |
|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 250 |
|
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 305 |
|
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 305 |
|
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 306 |
|
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Matt Vickers voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 301 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Philips Trust Corporation
Asked by: Matt Vickers (Conservative - Stockton South) Tuesday 12th March 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he plans to take steps to support people who lost (a) money and (b) assets due to the collapse of the Philips Trust Corporation. Answered by Bim Afolami - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The Philips Trust Corporation was not authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and was not carrying out any regulated activities. As such, any losses are not covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Consumers who have concerns about the role played by their bank or building society in relation to Philips Trust Corporation may be eligible to complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). Whether a particular complaint is eligible or not is a matter for the FOS. |
|
Electric Vehicles: VAT
Asked by: Matt Vickers (Conservative - Stockton South) Thursday 14th March 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of raising the luxury vehicles tax threshold for electric vehicles. Answered by Gareth Davies - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) As with all taxes, the Government keeps the Expensive Car Supplement under review, and any changes will be announced at a future fiscal event. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 15th March 2024
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister for Schools relating to LGBT content in relationships education Petitions Committee |