Information between 16th March 2026 - 15th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
18 Mar 2026 - Fuel Duty - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 259 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Employment Rights: Investigatory Powers - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 368 Noes - 107 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Student Loans - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 266 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Higher Education Fees - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 19 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 98 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 273 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 167 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 167 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 161 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 149 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 158 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 163 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 162 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 162 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - Defence - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 306 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Mary Glindon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Mary Glindon speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Mary Glindon contributed 2 speeches (99 words) Tuesday 24th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
Mary Glindon speeches from: Tobacco and Vapes Bill
Mary Glindon contributed 2 speeches (118 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 23rd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Mary Glindon speeches from: Business of the House
Mary Glindon contributed 1 speech (109 words) Thursday 19th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Poultry: Animal Housing
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Wednesday 18th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, with reference to her Department's consultation entitled Cage reform: proposed ban on keeping laying hens, pullets and breeder layers in cages, published on 12 January 2026, whether she has made an assessment of the potential impact of the proposals to ban all cage systems for laying hens, pullets and breeder layers on the level of imports of (a) eggs and (b) egg products from (i) EU and (ii) non-EU countries. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government has carried out an assessment and, as part of the recent consultation on laying hen cage reform, sought views on that assessment. The consultation also sought additional evidence on how the proposals will affect egg production costs and current levels of imports and exports. We are now analysing the consultation responses and will publish a formal response in due course.
As set out in the UK’s trade strategy, the Government will always consider whether overseas produce has an unfair advantage. Where necessary, the Government will be prepared to use the full range of powers at the Government’s disposal to protect UK’s most sensitive sectors. |
|
Poultry: Animal Housing
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Wednesday 18th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, with reference to her Department's consultation entitled Cage reform: proposed ban on keeping laying hens, pullets and breeder layers in cages, published on 12 January 2026, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of banning caged (a) eggs and (b) egg products from (i) EU and (ii) non-EU countries. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government has carried out an assessment and, as part of the recent consultation on laying hen cage reform, sought views on that assessment. The consultation also sought additional evidence on how the proposals will affect egg production costs and current levels of imports and exports. We are now analysing the consultation responses and will publish a formal response in due course.
As set out in the UK’s trade strategy, the Government will always consider whether overseas produce has an unfair advantage. Where necessary, the Government will be prepared to use the full range of powers at the Government’s disposal to protect UK’s most sensitive sectors. |
|
Department for Education: Offices
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she plans to publish plans for office closures within her Department. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) As part of the department’s People Strategy and in line with the government's commitment to a more productive, agile and efficient civil service, the department has developed a long-term locations strategy. This includes closing six of our smaller sites and moving towards a focused 8-site model, with locations at Bristol, Cambridge, Coventry, Darlington, London, Manchester, Nottingham and Sheffield. My noble Friend, the Secretary of State for Education does not plan to publish plans for office closures. Our external communications are focused on the department's strategy, delivery and changes impacting the sector. This is an internal issue for the department. |
|
Department for Education: Finance
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what the savings targets are for each directorate in her Department for (a) 2026-27, (b) 2027-28 and (c) 2028-29. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Each year, the department must make tough decisions to ensure every pound of taxpayers’ money is driving high and rising standards for our children, ensuring every child has the best start in life. The department considers priorities across the department to determine how best to allocate its available funding. A breakdown of the department’s funding for 2026/27 will be published in due course in the 2026/27 Main Estimate and in each subsequent year. This will be published on GOV.UK. The 2025/26 Main Estimate can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/main-supply-estimates-2025-to-2026.
|
|
Department for Education: Skilled Workers
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will (a) complete a full skills audit of staff within her Department and (b) share that audit with trade unions. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The department supports 15 professions to which we encourage staff to align themselves, and we collect data monthly on the number of members of each. As part of the Government Skills Campus platform, which is currently in development, the department is exploring the most effective ways to capture the live skills of staff. The department will then seek to agree with trade unions an appropriate approach to sharing this data.
|
|
Gaza: Health Services
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Thursday 2nd April 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what estimate she has made of the number of patient consultations that have been performed by UK-Med in Gaza as a result of UK aid funding. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The UK is providing £81 million of humanitarian and early recovery support as part of our £116 million programme for Palestine this financial year, including support for UK-Med. Funding to UK-Med has supported over a million patient consultations across Gaza but humanitarian partners are still reporting delays and restrictions in providing medical support, and denials of critical medical supplies. We continue to press Israel to open all crossings and lift restrictions preventing urgently needed medical supplies from reaching those in desperate need. |
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what proportion of frontline customer contact work HMRC expects to be delivered by Managed Staff Provider staff versus directly employed civil servants over (a) the next 12 months and (b) the duration of the Comprehensive Spending Review, and if she will make a statement. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Customer demand for HMRC services can fluctuate significantly, both seasonally and in response to external events. HMRC uses Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to provide additional, flexible capacity to help manage these types of variations and support performance on customer helplines. Incorporating MSPs into the overall resourcing mix helps HMRC maintain customer service standards, while retaining expertise within its workforce.
The current staff provided by MSPs represent additional capacity for 2025/26. The proportion of frontline customer contact work delivered by MSP staff is small compared to the proportion of work handled by HMRC staff. No HMRC staff will be made redundant as a result of this initiative. HMRC headcount is forecast to increase by the end of the Spending Review 2025 period.
HMRC are not privatising their services and there are no plans to outsource customer contact services beyond this limited contract for additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC intends the expertise behind customer support to remain within HMRC.
HMRC will continue to use a range of resourcing models, including Surge, alongside the use of MSPs, to meet variable customer demand. With a complex mix of transformation, resourcing models and impacts from external events it is difficult to attribute work to single things or make statements about permanent approaches. Future workforce decisions will be taken through normal business planning and Spending Review processes.
HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. Whilst HMRC sees MSPs as part of its resourcing mix going forward, a joint HMRC and PCS evaluation will take place to inform future use, beyond the next 12 months.
|
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether HMRC intends for the Managed Service Provider to remain limited to peak demand cover or to become a permanent component of Customer Services Group resourcing, and if she will make a statement. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Customer demand for HMRC services can fluctuate significantly, both seasonally and in response to external events. HMRC uses Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to provide additional, flexible capacity to help manage these types of variations and support performance on customer helplines. Incorporating MSPs into the overall resourcing mix helps HMRC maintain customer service standards, while retaining expertise within its workforce.
The current staff provided by MSPs represent additional capacity for 2025/26. The proportion of frontline customer contact work delivered by MSP staff is small compared to the proportion of work handled by HMRC staff. No HMRC staff will be made redundant as a result of this initiative. HMRC headcount is forecast to increase by the end of the Spending Review 2025 period.
HMRC are not privatising their services and there are no plans to outsource customer contact services beyond this limited contract for additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC intends the expertise behind customer support to remain within HMRC.
HMRC will continue to use a range of resourcing models, including Surge, alongside the use of MSPs, to meet variable customer demand. With a complex mix of transformation, resourcing models and impacts from external events it is difficult to attribute work to single things or make statements about permanent approaches. Future workforce decisions will be taken through normal business planning and Spending Review processes.
HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. Whilst HMRC sees MSPs as part of its resourcing mix going forward, a joint HMRC and PCS evaluation will take place to inform future use, beyond the next 12 months.
|
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what modelling has been undertaken on the future role of Surge staff and other flexible HMRC resources in light of potential Managed Service Provider expansion. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Customer demand for HMRC services can fluctuate significantly, both seasonally and in response to external events. HMRC uses Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to provide additional, flexible capacity to help manage these types of variations and support performance on customer helplines. Incorporating MSPs into the overall resourcing mix helps HMRC maintain customer service standards, while retaining expertise within its workforce.
The current staff provided by MSPs represent additional capacity for 2025/26. The proportion of frontline customer contact work delivered by MSP staff is small compared to the proportion of work handled by HMRC staff. No HMRC staff will be made redundant as a result of this initiative. HMRC headcount is forecast to increase by the end of the Spending Review 2025 period.
HMRC are not privatising their services and there are no plans to outsource customer contact services beyond this limited contract for additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC intends the expertise behind customer support to remain within HMRC.
HMRC will continue to use a range of resourcing models, including Surge, alongside the use of MSPs, to meet variable customer demand. With a complex mix of transformation, resourcing models and impacts from external events it is difficult to attribute work to single things or make statements about permanent approaches. Future workforce decisions will be taken through normal business planning and Spending Review processes.
HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. Whilst HMRC sees MSPs as part of its resourcing mix going forward, a joint HMRC and PCS evaluation will take place to inform future use, beyond the next 12 months.
|
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether HMRC can confirm that Managed Staffing Provider staffing represents additional capacity rather than a substitution for civil service roles. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Customer demand for HMRC services can fluctuate significantly, both seasonally and in response to external events. HMRC uses Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to provide additional, flexible capacity to help manage these types of variations and support performance on customer helplines. Incorporating MSPs into the overall resourcing mix helps HMRC maintain customer service standards, while retaining expertise within its workforce.
The current staff provided by MSPs represent additional capacity for 2025/26. The proportion of frontline customer contact work delivered by MSP staff is small compared to the proportion of work handled by HMRC staff. No HMRC staff will be made redundant as a result of this initiative. HMRC headcount is forecast to increase by the end of the Spending Review 2025 period.
HMRC are not privatising their services and there are no plans to outsource customer contact services beyond this limited contract for additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC intends the expertise behind customer support to remain within HMRC.
HMRC will continue to use a range of resourcing models, including Surge, alongside the use of MSPs, to meet variable customer demand. With a complex mix of transformation, resourcing models and impacts from external events it is difficult to attribute work to single things or make statements about permanent approaches. Future workforce decisions will be taken through normal business planning and Spending Review processes.
HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. Whilst HMRC sees MSPs as part of its resourcing mix going forward, a joint HMRC and PCS evaluation will take place to inform future use, beyond the next 12 months.
|
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Mary Glindon (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether HMRC anticipates a reduction in the use or recruitment of Surge staff as MSP staffing increases. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Customer demand for HMRC services can fluctuate significantly, both seasonally and in response to external events. HMRC uses Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to provide additional, flexible capacity to help manage these types of variations and support performance on customer helplines. Incorporating MSPs into the overall resourcing mix helps HMRC maintain customer service standards, while retaining expertise within its workforce.
The current staff provided by MSPs represent additional capacity for 2025/26. The proportion of frontline customer contact work delivered by MSP staff is small compared to the proportion of work handled by HMRC staff. No HMRC staff will be made redundant as a result of this initiative. HMRC headcount is forecast to increase by the end of the Spending Review 2025 period.
HMRC are not privatising their services and there are no plans to outsource customer contact services beyond this limited contract for additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC intends the expertise behind customer support to remain within HMRC.
HMRC will continue to use a range of resourcing models, including Surge, alongside the use of MSPs, to meet variable customer demand. With a complex mix of transformation, resourcing models and impacts from external events it is difficult to attribute work to single things or make statements about permanent approaches. Future workforce decisions will be taken through normal business planning and Spending Review processes.
HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. Whilst HMRC sees MSPs as part of its resourcing mix going forward, a joint HMRC and PCS evaluation will take place to inform future use, beyond the next 12 months.
|
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 23rd March Mary Glindon signed this EDM on Tuesday 28th April 2026 Redundancies of skilled rail workers at Balfour Beatty 24 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Connor Naismith (Labour - Crewe and Nantwich) That this House applauds the work done by rail workers in renewing rail track, overhead lines and other infrastructure, which ensure the safety of rail travel in Britain; notes that Network Rail sub-contracts most renewals work to construction companies rather than delivering the work in-house as with maintenance; further notes … |
|
Wednesday 11th March Mary Glindon signed this EDM on Tuesday 28th April 2026 13 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026) Tabled by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) That this House notes with concern the increased problematic use of ketamine, particularly among young people; further notes that its severe impacts can include cognitive impairment, psychological difficulties and physical damage to the bladder, kidneys and urinary tract, leading to dependency and contributing to deaths; recognises that those affected may … |
|
Monday 9th March Mary Glindon signed this EDM on Tuesday 28th April 2026 Industrial relations at Carlisle Support Services 18 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) That this House commends the work of station staff employed by outsourcing company Carlisle Support Services who work on stations managed by publicly owned Northern Trains to collect revenue and operate station gatelines across the North; notes that these station staff work on the frontline of what will be Great … |
|
Thursday 5th March Mary Glindon signed this EDM on Tuesday 28th April 2026 Trade union de-recognition at GB Railfreight 23 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) That this House is concerned that employers are exploiting loopholes in the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) process to de-recognise trade unions; condemns this practice which undermines good industrial relations; notes that workers in the privately owned and operated rail freight sector are regularly affected by … |
|
Tuesday 3rd February Mary Glindon signed this EDM on Tuesday 28th April 2026 Seafarer pay and conditions at the Royal Fleet Auxiliary 22 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) That this House notes the pay dispute between 1,700 civilian seafarers, the recognised trade unions, including the RMT and the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA); applauds the hard work of RFA seafarers which involves over 65% of the Royal Navy's task tasking on top of their own work, on a reduced … |
|
Monday 8th December Mary Glindon signed this EDM on Tuesday 28th April 2026 Driver-only trains on East West Rail 16 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: John McDonnell (Labour - Hayes and Harlington) That this House notes that rail operator Chiltern, which was appointed as the operator of the initial phase of East West Rail by the Department for Transport, has informed the rail unions of its intention to operate the route via Driver Only Operation (DOO); further notes that, under DOO, there … |
|
Monday 13th April Mary Glindon signed this EDM on Monday 20th April 2026 100th anniversary of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 101 signatures (Most recent: 21 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Adam Jogee (Labour - Newcastle-under-Lyme) That this House notes, with affection and respect, the 100th anniversary, on 21 April 2026 of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II; reflects on the sense of loss that people throughout the United Kingdom, the realms, territories and Commonwealth still feel following Her late Majesty’s death on … |
|
Monday 16th March Mary Glindon signed this EDM on Tuesday 17th March 2026 13 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026) Tabled by: Kate Osborne (Labour - Jarrow and Gateshead East) That this House congratulates athletics legend Steve Cram CBE on being officially recognised at Monkton Stadium in Jarrow for his outstanding contribution to sport in the North East; commends his contribution to athletics as one of the world’s legendary middle distance runners during the 1980s; applauds his achievements in the … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
17 Mar 2026, 4:26 p.m. - House of Commons "Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi. David Smith. Peter Prinsley. Rachel Gilmour. Mary Glindon. Jen Craft. Paulette " Catherine McKinnell MP (Newcastle upon Tyne North, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Mar 2026, 11:43 a.m. - House of Commons " Mary Glindon thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Deputy Speaker. >> A local pharmacy has contacted me regarding the need for a fast resolution to this year's " Mary Glindon MP (Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Mar 2026, 12:09 p.m. - House of Commons " Mary Glindon Mr Speaker. >> Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. >> Well, after a lot of hullabaloo about the oil and gas industry, we now get to turn to the areas. " Chris McDonald MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) (Stockton North, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Mar 2026, 12:10 p.m. - House of Commons " Mary Glindon. >> Mary Glindon. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. AR seven was a resounding vote of confidence from developers and our supply " Mary Glindon MP (Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Tobacco and Vapes Bill
51 speeches (11,551 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 23rd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Euan Stainbank (Lab - Falkirk) Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend (Mary Glindon).As a member of the Bill Committee - Link to Speech |
|
Pre-1997 Pensions: Discretionary Increases
27 speeches (4,825 words) Thursday 19th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: Luke Akehurst (Lab - North Durham) Blaydon and Consett, for City of Durham (Mary Kelly Foy), for Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend (Mary Glindon - Link to Speech |
|
Clinical Negligence
2 speeches (1,658 words) 1st reading Commons Hansard Link Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Catherine McKinnell (Lab - Newcastle upon Tyne North) Hunt, Marsha De Cordova, Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, David Smith, Peter Prinsley, Rachel Gilmour, Mary Glindon - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-03-24 16:15:00+00:00 Proposals for backbench debates - Backbench Business Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Bob Blackman (Chair); Jonathan Davies; Mr Lee Dillon; Mary Glindon |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-03-17 16:15:00+00:00 Proposals for backbench debates - Backbench Business Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Bob Blackman (Chair); Jonathan Davies; Mary Glindon; Will Stone; |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 4 p.m. Backbench Business Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Proposals for backbench debates View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026 4 p.m. Backbench Business Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Proposals for backbench debates At 4:15pm: Oral evidence Members of Parliament - Members of Parliament at House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 10 a.m. Administration Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 4 p.m. Backbench Business Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Proposals for backbench debates At 4:15pm: Oral evidence Members of Parliament - Members of Parliament at House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 10 a.m. Administration Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-03-17 16:15:00+00:00 Proposals for backbench debates - Backbench Business Committee |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-03-24 16:15:00+00:00 Proposals for backbench debates - Backbench Business Committee |
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-04-14 16:15:00+01:00 Proposals for backbench debates - Backbench Business Committee |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-04-21 16:15:00+01:00 Proposals for backbench debates - Backbench Business Committee |