All 1 Debates between Mark Pritchard and James Naish

Responsibilities of Housing Developers

Debate between Mark Pritchard and James Naish
Wednesday 11th December 2024

(1 week, 6 days ago)

Westminster Hall
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.

Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Mark Pritchard Portrait Mark Pritchard (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

I call James Naish. [Interruption.] Yes, I called you.

James Naish Portrait James Naish (Rushcliffe) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It didn’t sound like my name.

Mark Pritchard Portrait Mark Pritchard (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

The Clerk doesn’t know it and I don’t know it, but I hope you know it.

James Naish Portrait James Naish
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is James Naish for Rushcliffe.

Mark Pritchard Portrait Mark Pritchard (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

I apologise for my Hereford-Shropshire accent. Some of us from the west midlands are still in this place.

James Naish Portrait James Naish (Rushcliffe) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Thank you, Mr Pritchard, for calling me to speak, whether I know my name or not. I congratulate the hon. Member for Keighley and Ilkley (Robbie Moore)—I do know where Keighley is—for securing this important debate on the responsibilities of house builders.

I want to speak briefly to highlight the fantastic work of one of my constituents, Sarah Postlethwaite, who is a senior planning ecologist. In March this year, in her own time, Sarah conducted a detailed audit on the implementation of ecological planning conditions in her home village of East Leake. I have a copy of her report here, and it makes for fascinating reading. She looked at 11 built-out sites from the past decade, and the headline figure is that the overall compliance rate for ecological planning conditions was 9.5 out of 36 conditions, or a meagre 26%.

At one development by Persimmon Homes, which had 294 homes built out, there was an inadequate number of bat and swift boxes, which were badly installed and/or in inappropriate locations. It was also not possible to determine whether the promised meadow grassland and flowering lawn mixes had been sown appropriately. At sites by other developers, hedges were removed, despite commitments to retain them. Grassland areas were not created as required, and sustainable drainage systems were not fully built, despite people occupying nearby houses.

I acknowledge that time has passed since the audit was completed earlier this year, but I thought it would be useful to highlight the bottom-up work taking done by constituents such as mine who are keen to see house builders deliver on the conditions that are agreed when planning permission is granted. I commend Sarah’s work, which was reported by the BBC and which, as a result, secured apologies from both Barratt Homes and Persimmon Homes. Miller Homes said it was finalising its ecology measures at the time of reporting.

I sympathise to an extent with the position of local authorities that have neither the resources nor the expertise to hold developers to account, as they would wish. None the less, councils need to take their enforcement responsibilities seriously and to be appropriately financed and resourced, so that we can make sure that developers meet their ecological and other varied and important commitments; if not, swift and effective remedial actions should be taken. I would welcome hearing more from the Minister on how we empower councils to do that.

Mark Pritchard Portrait Mark Pritchard (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

I am afraid that we are down to two minutes each for the last two speakers. I call Olly Glover.