All 3 Debates between Mark Francois and Terry Jermy

Thu 12th Dec 2024
Thu 12th Dec 2024
Tue 10th Dec 2024
Armed Forces Commissioner Bill (First sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee stage:s: 1st sitting & Committee stage

Armed Forces Commissioner Bill (Third sitting)

Debate between Mark Francois and Terry Jermy
Mark Francois Portrait Mr Francois
- Hansard - -

I understand the hon. Lady’s question, and I do not want to get into an “angels on a pinhead” argument, but that member of staff could be part-time. It could be that on the staff of the commissioner is a qualified KC, but only brought into action when there is a specific legal aspect to be examined—they would not necessarily have to sit in their office five days a week waiting for a case to come in. If there was no work, then they would not necessarily be employed.

I accept that perhaps we should have put the words “part or full-time” into the amendment, but the key thing is that the commissioner would have access to a King’s counsel, even on a part-time basis, to deal with complaints that have a specific legal aspect, including aspects of lawfare. We did not mandate in the amendment that it had to be a full-time role.

Terry Jermy Portrait Terry Jermy (South West Norfolk) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I appreciate the point that the right hon. Gentleman is making about whether the role would be full-time, part-time or maybe just a few hours a week. But the fundamental issue for me is that the more restrictions or stipulations we mandate, the more we fundamentally influence the independence of the role, which was part of our open discussion on Tuesday. The more amendments, rules and procedures that we dictate, the more we weaken independence. Does he recognise that concern?

Mark Francois Portrait Mr Francois
- Hansard - -

I do, but I have a contrary concern. People are leaving the armed forces in greater numbers than are joining. The other day, the Minister said— he will correct me if I have this wrong—that for every 100 who join, 130 are leaving.

Armed Forces Commissioner Bill (Fourth sitting)

Debate between Mark Francois and Terry Jermy
Mark Francois Portrait Mr Francois
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend and I are grateful for that clarification. None the less, we need to put down a marker. We need to make very plain to the Government—not just the MOD, but the Treasury, because it will be a Treasury consultation and it is a Treasury tax—that we regard this point as very important and that we hope and believe that the Government should reverse this measure.

Terry Jermy Portrait Terry Jermy (South West Norfolk) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Mark Francois Portrait Mr Francois
- Hansard - -

No. On that basis, I intend to press the amendment to a vote.

Question put, That the amendment be made.

--- Later in debate ---
Mark Francois Portrait Mr Francois
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the hon. Lady. She will know, not least from her service on that important Committee, of what is called the statutory override. In a nutshell, local authorities must produce a balanced budget each year, but, because of the very great pressure on local authorities that are also LEAs, they have been allowed to overspend on SEN for several years because it is such a big pressure. Bluntly, it would have bankrupted some of them otherwise. She may be able to update us, but I understand that the default position is that the statutory override is due to expire in March 2026. In other words, when local authorities are planning their new budgets for the ’26-’27 financial year, those budgets will have to balance.

I served on the Public Accounts Committee for a couple of years in the previous Parliament. About a month ago, the National Audit Office produced a report, which I am sure the Education Committee will look at, basically saying that the current system is unsustainable. This will be a challenge for the new Government. I am not trying to make a partisan point here, but it was a challenge for the previous Government and it will be a challenge for the new Labour Government, too. I mention that just to drive home the scale of the SEN challenge. There is no evidence that armed forces personnel are proportionately more or less likely to have a special needs child than members of civilian communities, so statistically it is a big problem for them, too.

Terry Jermy Portrait Terry Jermy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the shadow Minister give way?

Mark Francois Portrait Mr Francois
- Hansard - -

I am trying to wind up, but I will give way if the hon. Gentleman wishes to make a point. This is an important topic.

Terry Jermy Portrait Terry Jermy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In a surgery just two weeks ago, I had a serving member of the armed forces who is no longer deployable because he has to homeschool his child as a result of failure in relation to SEND. Does the shadow Minister agree that one of the big challenges is that this is widespread across the whole country? It is not just a problem for us in Norfolk. If my constituent were to be deployed elsewhere, there would be exactly the same challenges, because the issue is widespread across the whole country.

Mark Francois Portrait Mr Francois
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman makes a good point. I do not have the NAO report in front of me, and that is my fault—forgive me—but from memory, it made the point that this was a nationwide problem. The scale of the problem was such that it did not just affect region or another; it touched pretty much everywhere. I think the NAO focused mainly on England and Wales, but certainly in those two nations this was a big problem, and I have nothing to lead me to believe that it is not a problem in Scotland or Northern Ireland.

On childcare, I should add that one result of “Stick or Twist?” was that the then Defence Secretary, Ben Wallace, managed to use the report as ammunition to persuade the Treasury to invest quite a lot of money in childcare facilities for armed forces personnel. The Minister will know how difficult that can be. It included improving childcare facilities at a number of military installations around the country and, in some cases, extending the hours to something more akin to wraparound childcare. For the record, if only for that, the report was worth writing.

I think we have given this issue a good go, and I know my hon. Friend the Member for Spelthorne wants to raise another, so I will leave it there. I am sure the Minister understands the spirit of this clause stand part debate, and I very much hope that he can give us some good news in this area. I am sure that the whole Committee, as well as the armed forces and their families, would welcome that.

Armed Forces Commissioner Bill (First sitting)

Debate between Mark Francois and Terry Jermy
Mark Francois Portrait Mr Francois
- Hansard - -

Thank you very much.

Terry Jermy Portrait Terry Jermy (South West Norfolk) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Q Sir Andrew, I work closely with SSAFA. You have some fantastic volunteers in Norfolk. Thank you for the work your organisation does.

Lt General Sir Andrew Gregory: Thank you very much.