Debates between Marcus Jones and Ed Davey during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Marcus Jones and Ed Davey
Thursday 11th July 2013

(11 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As regards visiting the hon. Gentleman’s constituency and its installations, I shall consult my diary. At a meeting of the Nuclear Industry Council yesterday, we engaged on a range of issues, from skills to finance and future collaboration, and we have put in place the strongest ever supply-chain measures to ensure that the whole country, including people in his constituency, can benefit.

Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Marcus Jones
- Hansard - -

I commend the Government’s effort to strengthen our energy system and bring about a sustainable reduction in electricity demand, but does the Secretary of State agree that we must take action to ensure that sufficient generating capacity is available in the short term?

Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I strongly agree with my hon. Friend. It is important that we take action on both the demand and the supply side. With Ofgem and National Grid’s proposals, which are out to consultation, we will see measures on the supply and demand side in the short term, and of course our proposal for a capacity market will do that in the medium term. I hope that he realises that we are looking at every single measure in a very structured way.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Marcus Jones and Ed Davey
Thursday 14th March 2013

(11 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I must remind the hon. Gentleman that the figures based on the old way of counting show that fuel poverty increased under the last Government. This Government have conducted an independent review of the way in which fuel poverty is measured, and it showed that the last Government could not even measure it correctly. According to the old measurement, the Queen was sometimes in fuel poverty. However, we are reforming not just the measurement of fuel poverty but the policies themselves, and I shall be producing a fuel poverty strategy later this year.

Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Marcus Jones (Nuneaton) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I want to thank the Minister of State, my hon. Friend the Member for South Holland and The Deepings (Mr Hayes) for the care and support he has shown for the workers at the Daw Mill colliery during this difficult time. In addition to the work he is doing, will he make representations to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to ensure that it is fully engaged with local organisations in the provision of careers advice, support and retraining opportunities for the workers who cannot be redeployed in the coal industry?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Marcus Jones and Ed Davey
Thursday 1st November 2012

(11 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Marcus Jones (Nuneaton) (Con)
- Hansard - -

16. What steps he is taking to ensure that nuclear power provides a significant proportion of the UK's future electricity supply.

Ed Davey Portrait The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Mr Edward Davey)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government remain committed to ensuring that conditions are right for investment in new nuclear power in the UK without public subsidy, and we have taken action to remove potential barriers. The carbon floor price and electricity market reform will provide the certainty needed for investment in low carbon generation, including nuclear. The Government are talking to NNB GenCo about the potential terms for Hinkley Point C, and earlier this week I welcomed the excellent news that Hitachi had acquired Horizon Nuclear Power.

--- Later in debate ---
Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Jones
- Hansard - -

I congratulate my right hon. Friend and his ministerial team on encouraging the substantial investment to secure Britain’s nuclear future that Hitachi has announced only this week. Will he say a little more about what the Government are going to do to ensure that we secure as many British jobs as possible from this substantial investment?

Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. This is not only good news and a huge vote of confidence for the UK’s energy policy; it is also good news for British industry. Hitachi has already signed a memorandum of understanding with Rolls-Royce and Babcock, and the supply chain potential is huge, with 6,000 jobs during construction at Wylfa and Oldbury, and 1,000 permanent jobs after construction. When I announced the Hitachi decision, I also announced that we had set up the Nuclear Industry Council to enable the Government to work with the industry to maximise the potential for the supply chain in this country.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Marcus Jones and Ed Davey
Thursday 8th December 2011

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government’s strategy is to ensure that we are not gold-plating. I am sure that my hon. Friend will have been pleased that on 23 November we published a call for evidence on the TUPE regulations, which he mentioned. It is available on the Department’s website and I encourage all right hon. and hon. Members to respond.

Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Marcus Jones
- Hansard - -

I recently met local business people at a constituency event sponsored by the Federation of Small Businesses, and they told me that they were apprehensive about taking on additional employees because of the culture of employment tribunals, to which employees can take even the most spurious claims without any personal risk whatever. What can the Minister do to address that issue, which, if tackled, would encourage more employers to take on extra staff?

Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have listened to both employer and employee concerns about the cost and complexity of going to employment tribunals, and believe that our reforms will make a positive difference to both parties. We have set out our conclusions and our response to the “Resolving Workplace Disputes” consultation. Critical aspects of our new approach include a major new emphasis on mediation and a new pre-claim conciliation service by ACAS, and, finally, a fundamental review of the rules and procedures is now being undertaken by Lord Justice Underhill.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Marcus Jones and Ed Davey
Thursday 27th October 2011

(12 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

During the passage of the Postal Services Act, we heard a lot of criticism of the regulatory regime that the Labour party put in place. We put in a much stronger regime, which has been greatly welcomed.

Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Marcus Jones (Nuneaton) (Con)
- Hansard - -

2. What steps he is taking to support manufacturing.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Marcus Jones and Ed Davey
Thursday 14th July 2011

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Marcus Jones (Nuneaton) (Con)
- Hansard - -

With reference to the Minister’s response to the question from my hon. Friend the Member for Tewkesbury (Mr Robertson), Triton Showers, which employs 400 people in my constituency, is extremely concerned that the waste electrical and electronic equipment directive is now being aggressively enforced by the Environment Agency. Bearing in mind the Minister’s earlier answer, will he now make representations to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on this issue, which is causing real concern in the electric shower industry?

Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will certainly look at this. As I said in my answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Tewkesbury, the guidance is slightly separate from the directive, so there is a need for clarity. That is why we are trying to renegotiate these matters in the recasting of the directive.