Luke Murphy Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Luke Murphy

Information between 7th May 2025 - 17th May 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 287
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 363
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 294
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 295
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 95
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 318
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 402
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 404
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 315
13 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 6
13 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 2
13 May 2025 - UK-EU Summit - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 402
13 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 6
13 May 2025 - UK-EU Summit - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 102
13 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 12
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 11
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 168
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 98
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 68
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 8
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 98
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 1 Noes - 9
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10
14 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11
15 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
15 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
15 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
15 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
15 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
15 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9
15 May 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 200 Labour No votes vs 129 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 279
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 206 Labour Aye votes vs 127 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 239


Speeches
Luke Murphy speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Ninth sitting)
Luke Murphy contributed 1 speech (210 words)
Committee stage: 9th sitting
Thursday 15th May 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Luke Murphy speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Luke Murphy contributed 2 speeches (144 words)
Wednesday 14th May 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Science, Innovation & Technology
Luke Murphy speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)
Luke Murphy contributed 2 speeches (209 words)
Committee stage: 7th sitting
Wednesday 14th May 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Luke Murphy speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)
Luke Murphy contributed 3 speeches (548 words)
Committee stage: 8th sitting
Wednesday 14th May 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Luke Murphy speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)
Luke Murphy contributed 3 speeches (388 words)
Committee stage: 6th sitting
Tuesday 13th May 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Luke Murphy speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Fifth sitting)
Luke Murphy contributed 5 speeches (290 words)
Committee stage: 5th sitting
Tuesday 13th May 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government


Written Answers
Children: Anxiety
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Friday 9th May 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of training available to school and children's social care staff on (a) recognising and (b) responding to anxiety-led behaviour in children.

Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

This government is committed to improving mental health support for all children and young people. This is critical to breaking down barriers to opportunity and helping pupils to achieve and thrive in education.

Support from the department includes an online resource hub that hosts practical and evidence-informed resources to support the delivery of a whole school approach to mental health and wellbeing. The hub includes support for responding to anxiety-related issues and can be found here: https://www.mentallyhealthyschools.org.uk/whole-school-or-college-resources/.

Mental Health Support Teams (MHSTs) continue to roll out in schools and colleges across the country, delivering evidence-based interventions for early mental health issues and supporting mental health leads with their whole school approach. As of April 2024, MHSTs covered 44% of pupils in schools and learners in further education in England and the department expects coverage to have reached at least 50% of pupils and learners this year. Through expanding MHSTs, the government will make sure that every young person has access to early support to address problems before they escalate.

Statutory guidance for virtual school heads sets out that they should, where possible, work with designated teachers to ensure that schools are able to identify signs of potential mental health issues and know how to access further assessment and support where necessary. This includes ensuring that schools understand the impact that issues such as trauma and attachment difficulties can have on looked-after and previously looked-after children.

Provision of continuing professional development for employed social workers is a matter for their employer. The regulator for the social work profession, Social Work England, sets the professional standards which all social workers must meet. These require social workers to promote the strength and wellbeing of people, including children, and provide or support people to access advice and services tailored to meet their needs.

Special Educational Needs
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Friday 9th May 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of the extent to which unmet support needs related to Special Educational Needs and Disability are considered in assessments of parenting capacity during child protection and pre-proceeding processes.

Answered by Janet Daby - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

As a child-centred government, we are taking forward significant reform of children’s social care to rebalance the system towards earlier intervention and ensure that children and families get access to the right help, at the point of need. Our Families First Partnership programme, backed by over £500 million in 2025/26, emphasises the importance of a whole family approach throughout the system of help, support and protection.

The department’s statutory guidance ‘Working together to safeguard children’ encourages local authorities to consider appointing a Designated Social Care Officer who can help strengthen the links between social care services and the special educational needs and disabilities system, and co-ordinate children’s educational, health and care needs assessments with other social care assessments. The guidance is also clear that practitioners should consider the needs of parents when assessing whether a child is in need of protection. In pre-proceedings, the local authority should work in partnership with families and, where possible, any extra support or services needed to support the family should be identified and put in place.

Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Rivers
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Thursday 8th May 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of changes to the planning system in the Planning and Infrastructure Bill on the protection of chalk streams.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to Question UIN 45278 on 30 April 2025.

Personal Independence Payment: Veterans
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Thursday 8th May 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps her Department is taking to support veterans who were advised to claim Personal Independence Payment instead of Armed Forces Independence Payment.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Veterans are able to access the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS), which provides compensation for injury or illness caused or made worse by Service on or after 6 April 2005. For serious injuries and illness, the AFCS provides a tax-free index-linked income stream known as the Guaranteed Income Payment (GIP). The Armed Forces Independence Payment (AFIP) is an additional allowance which provides financial support for eligible service personnel and veterans who have an AFCS GIP. It is an alternative to PIP (and other disability benefits), based on separate eligibility criteria, but paid at the same rate as the combined enhanced daily living and mobility components. The eligibility criteria for AFIP is not due to change.

If a veteran is advised to claim PIP rather than AFIP, it is most likely due to the fact that they would not be eligible for AFIP. If the long-term condition or disability is not service-related or if the GIP is below 50% of the veteran's salary, then PIP would be considered rather than AFIP.

Timesharing
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Tuesday 13th May 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the time taken for the Financial Ombudsman Service to make final decisions on fractional timeshare finance products on consumers.

Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

The government takes the issue of fraud very seriously and is dedicated to protecting the public from this devastating crime. Tackling fraud requires a unified and coordinated response from government, regulators, law enforcement and the private sector to better protect the public and businesses from fraud.

The legislation surrounding the sale of timeshares and credit agreements relating to timeshares provide routes of redress where consumers have been misled.

Firstly, it is an offence under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 for traders to engage in unfair commercial practices which mislead consumers, and it is punishable by a fine or imprisonment for up to two years. The Act will also afford rights of redress for consumers.

Regarding the timeshare market specifically, the Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Regulations 2010 provide protections for consumers buying and selling timeshares and other long-term “holiday club” memberships, including provision for consumers to withdraw from their contract.

Consumers are protected from fraud in consumer law. Consumers that believe they have been fraudulently sold timeshare products should raise their concerns with the relevant enforcement authorities.

In cases where a consumer took out a regulated financial product to purchase a timeshare, they may have recourse to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) if that product was mis-sold.

When complaints are made to the FOS, these should be dealt with in a timely manner. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook, which sets out the rules on how the FOS should handle complaints, states that ‘the ombudsman will attempt to resolve complaints at the earliest possible stage’.  Ensuring timely outcomes is one of the FOS’s main priorities for 2025-26 and it has set itself a target to resolve 85 per cent of cases received in the year within 6 months.

Timesharing: Fraud and Misrepresentation
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Tuesday 13th May 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps her Department is taking to support consumers who have experienced potential (a) mis-selling and (b) fraud on fractional timeshare finance products.

Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

The government takes the issue of fraud very seriously and is dedicated to protecting the public from this devastating crime. Tackling fraud requires a unified and coordinated response from government, regulators, law enforcement and the private sector to better protect the public and businesses from fraud.

The legislation surrounding the sale of timeshares and credit agreements relating to timeshares provide routes of redress where consumers have been misled.

Firstly, it is an offence under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 for traders to engage in unfair commercial practices which mislead consumers, and it is punishable by a fine or imprisonment for up to two years. The Act will also afford rights of redress for consumers.

Regarding the timeshare market specifically, the Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Regulations 2010 provide protections for consumers buying and selling timeshares and other long-term “holiday club” memberships, including provision for consumers to withdraw from their contract.

Consumers are protected from fraud in consumer law. Consumers that believe they have been fraudulently sold timeshare products should raise their concerns with the relevant enforcement authorities.

In cases where a consumer took out a regulated financial product to purchase a timeshare, they may have recourse to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) if that product was mis-sold.

When complaints are made to the FOS, these should be dealt with in a timely manner. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook, which sets out the rules on how the FOS should handle complaints, states that ‘the ombudsman will attempt to resolve complaints at the earliest possible stage’.  Ensuring timely outcomes is one of the FOS’s main priorities for 2025-26 and it has set itself a target to resolve 85 per cent of cases received in the year within 6 months.

Mental Health Services: Children and Young People
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Tuesday 13th May 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of training available to (a) Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services and (b) other healthcare staff on recognising and responding to anxiety-led behaviour in children.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It is the responsibility of each provider of mental health services to ensure that training meets the learning needs of their staff and that all staff adhere to and keep themselves appraised of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance.

Additionally, NHS England provides a number of further training programmes that are accessible to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services and other healthcare staff.

We will also publish a refreshed workforce plan to deliver the transformed health service we will build over the next decade, and treat patients on time again.  We will ensure the National Health Service has the right people, in the right places, with the right skills to deliver the care patients need when they need it.

Timesharing: Contracts
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Wednesday 14th May 2025

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the potential implications for its policies of paragraph 4.39 of the Competition and Markets Authority’s report entitled CMA project on Timeshare Disposal, released under FOI on 21 April 2015.

Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)

The Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Contracts Regulations 2010 govern the sales of timeshares. They provide significant protections, including stipulating the information consumers must be aware of prior to purchase and a14 day right to exit, should the customer change their mind.

Purchasers of timeshares are also protected by general consumer law, requiring contract terms be fair and bans mis-selling. The CMA expressed the view that some in-perpetuity clauses may be unfair, depending on circumstances.

Enabling consumers to exit timeshares is a balance between protecting consumers wanting to leave and the interests of the business and those customers who remain and share admin costs.

Timesharing: Contracts
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Wednesday 14th May 2025

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of introducing legislation to provide consumers with a statutory right to exit in-perpetuity timeshare contracts.

Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)

The Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Contracts Regulations 2010 govern the sales of timeshares. They provide significant protections, including stipulating the information consumers must be aware of prior to purchase and a14 day right to exit, should the customer change their mind.

Purchasers of timeshares are also protected by general consumer law, requiring contract terms be fair and bans mis-selling. The CMA expressed the view that some in-perpetuity clauses may be unfair, depending on circumstances.

Enabling consumers to exit timeshares is a balance between protecting consumers wanting to leave and the interests of the business and those customers who remain and share admin costs.

Timesharing: Contracts
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Wednesday 14th May 2025

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of in-perpetuity clauses in timeshare contracts on consumers.

Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)

The Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Contracts Regulations 2010 govern the sales of timeshares. They provide significant protections, including stipulating the information consumers must be aware of prior to purchase and a14 day right to exit, should the customer change their mind.

Purchasers of timeshares are also protected by general consumer law, requiring contract terms be fair and bans mis-selling. The CMA expressed the view that some in-perpetuity clauses may be unfair, depending on circumstances.

Enabling consumers to exit timeshares is a balance between protecting consumers wanting to leave and the interests of the business and those customers who remain and share admin costs.

IVF: Donors
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Thursday 15th May 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of introducing enforceable limits on the number of children conceived from a single gamete donor.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the United Kingdom’s fertility sector regulator, has advised that donor sperm, eggs, or embryos should not be used to create more than 10 families in the UK.

The HFEA expects UK licensed clinics to ensure they do not breach the 10-family limit when using donors in treatment, as clearly specified in the HFEA Code of Practice. This limit only applies within the UK, so donors and recipients should be made aware that other countries might not have the same limits, or have no limits, on the number of children or families one donor can create.

IVF: Donors
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Thursday 15th May 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in relation to the regulation of donor conception.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is required by law to maintain records and make certain information available upon request to those affected by donor conception.

The HFEA was subject to a Public Bodies Review in 2023, where all aspects of the HFEA’s activity and performance was considered. The report was published on 23 November 2023, and is available at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/human-fertilisation-and-embryology-authority-hfea-review-report/independent-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-authority-hfea-final-report-and-recommendations

The Department reviews performance through quarterly accountability meetings on a continuing basis, which takes account of the recommendations set out in the report.

IVF: Donors
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Thursday 15th May 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the consistency of informed consent practices in donor conception.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has advised that it sets out strict requirements in its Licence Conditions and Code of Practice in relation to obtaining informed consent from egg, sperm, and embryo donors and patients undergoing donor conception treatment.

The HFEA Code of Practice requires licensed clinics to provide donors and patients with appropriate information and an offer of counselling prior to consent being given. At inspections, the clinic’s procedures for obtaining consent are reviewed to ensure that patients and donors have provided all relevant consents before undergoing any licensed activity. All inspection reports and decisions are published on the HFEA’s website.

The Department reviews the HFEA’s performance through quarterly accountability meetings on a continuing basis.

IVF
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Thursday 15th May 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of introducing a national system for tracking gamete and embryo donors.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the United Kingdom’s fertility sector regulator, has advised that HFEA licensed clinics are required by law to provide treatment and outcome information on all gamete or embryo donations taking place at clinics. The HFEA also runs the Donor Sibling Register, which enables people born through donor treatments in licenced clinics to trace their genetic origins.

This information is published on the HFEA’s website. Clinics are required to monitor the usage of donor gametes and embryos in the UK, and to act in accordance with the guidance set out in the HFEA Code of Practice.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Thursday 15th May 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department plans to amend the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 to reflect developments in reproductive technology.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) published Modernising Fertility Law in November 2023, which made a number of recommendations for legislative change, including around its regulatory powers. Ministers have met with the HFEA Chair and discussed the emerging regulatory challenges.

The Government is considering the HFEA’s priorities for changing the law and will decide how to take this forward at the earliest opportunity.

Postnatal Care
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke)
Friday 16th May 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that (a) access to weigh in services with health visitors and (b) other postnatal support is provided (i) consistently and (ii) accessibly to new parents in (A) Basingstoke, (B) Hampshire and (C) England.

Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Local authorities have responsibility for commissioning public health services, including health visiting and services for all new parents. The Healthy Child Programme sets out the services and support families can expect and includes guidance on weighing, screening, immunisation, health improvement, wellbeing, and parenting, as well as five mandated health and development reviews.

Department officials and NHS England have worked across the South East region to develop resources. This includes a Health Visiting Development Toolkit to help share best practice and ensure consistency.

The Government is committed to raising the healthiest generation of children ever and strengthening the health visiting service. To achieve this, we must ensure that families have the support they need to give their babies and children the best start and the building blocks for a healthy life.




Luke Murphy mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Seventh sitting)
124 speeches (16,905 words)
Committee stage: 7th sitting
Wednesday 14th May 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Attendance statistics - Member attendance (Session 2024-25)

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee

Found: of 20 (90.0%) Anneliese Midgley (Labour, Knowsley) (added 21 Oct 2024) 14 of 20 (70.0%) Luke Murphy



Bill Documents
May. 15 2025
Written evidence submitted by The Mammal Society (PIB129)
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Written evidence

Found: Minister Gen Kitchen Labour Wellingborough and Rushden Amanda Martin Labour Portsmouth North Luke Murphy




Luke Murphy - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 7th May 2025 2:30 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Tidal power and the Severn
At 3:00pm: Oral evidence
Sarah Williams-Gardener - Chair at Western Gateway
Shaun Gaffey - Senior Planner at RSPB Cymru
Dr Athanasios Angeloudis - Reader in Environmental Fluid Mechanics at School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh
At 4:00pm: Oral evidence
Sue Bartlett-Reed - Commissioner at Severn Estuary Commission
Chris Mills - Commissioner at Severn Estuary Commission
Dr Andrew Garrad CBE - Chair at Severn Estuary Commission
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 15th May 2025 2 p.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 13th May 2025 9:25 a.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 14th May 2025 9:25 a.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 15th May 2025 11:30 a.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 14th May 2025 2 p.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 13th May 2025 2:30 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy
At 3:30pm: Oral evidence
Sarah Jones MP - Minister of State at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 13th May 2025 3 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy
At 3:30pm: Oral evidence
Sarah Jones MP - Minister of State at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 13th May 2025 3 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy
At 3:30pm: Oral evidence
Sarah Jones MP - Minister of State at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Hugo Jones - Deputy Director for Green Growth at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 13th May 2025 2 p.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 21st May 2025 2:15 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: National planning for energy infrastructure
At 2:30pm: Oral evidence
Lawrence Slade FEI - Chief Executive at Energy Networks Associaiton
Charlotte Mitchell - Chief Planning Officer at National Grid Electricity Transmission
At 3:30pm: Oral evidence
Charles Wood - Deputy Director, Policy (Systems) at Energy UK
Chandni Ruparelia - Chief Operating Officer at Island Green Power
Eleri Wilce - Head of Offshore Consents UK & Ireland at RWE Renewables
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 21st May 2025 2:15 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: National planning for energy infrastructure
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 20th May 2025 9:25 a.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 22nd May 2025 11:30 a.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 22nd May 2025 2 p.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 21st May 2025 9 a.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: National planning for energy infrastructure
At 9:30am: Oral evidence
Sam Richards - Chief Executive Officer at Britain Remade
Jackie Copley MRTPI - Campaigns Lead at Campaign for Protection of Rural England
Isobel Morris - Senior Policy Officer - Energy at Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
At 10:30am: Oral evidence
Peta Donkin - Board Member and Policy and Practice Lead at National Infrastructure Planning Association
Ali Leeder - Director at Aeos Infrastructure Planning
Graham Gunby - National Infrastructure Planning Manager at Suffolk County Council
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 20th May 2025 2 p.m.
Planning and Infrastructure Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 21st May 2025 2:15 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: National planning for energy infrastructure
At 2:30pm: Oral evidence
Lawrence Slade FEI - Chief Executive at Energy Networks Associaiton
Charlotte Mitchell - Chief Planning Officer at National Grid Electricity Transmission
Julian Leslie CEng FIET - Director Strategic Energy Planning and Chief Engineer at National Energy System Operator (NESO)
At 3:30pm: Oral evidence
Charles Wood - Deputy Director, Policy (Systems) at Energy UK
Chandni Ruparelia - Chief Operating Officer at Island Green Power
Eleri Wilce - Head of Offshore Consents UK & Ireland at RWE Renewables
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 4th June 2025 2:30 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: The cost of energy
At 3:00pm: Oral evidence
Caroline Abrahams - Charity Director at Age UK
Maria Booker - Head of Policy at Fair By Design
Matt Copeland - Head of Policy and Public Affairs at National Energy Action
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 4th June 2025 2:30 p.m.
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: The cost of energy
At 3:00pm: Oral evidence
Caroline Abrahams - Charity Director at Age UK
Maria Booker - Head of Policy at Fair By Design
Matt Copeland - Head of Policy and Public Affairs at National Energy Action
At 4:00pm: Oral evidence
Merlin Hyman - Chief Executive at Regen
Angus McCarey - Chief Executive Officer at Uswitch
Dhara Vyas - Chief Executive Officer at Energy UK
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister for Energy relating to electricity grid connections reform, dated 23 April 2025

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister for Energy relating to the Energy National Policy Statements Review, dated 28 April 2025

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Secretary of State relating to the Future of Energy Security Summit, dated 28 April 2025

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Written Evidence - The Association of Colleges
WFP0139 - Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy

Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Written Evidence - Nesta
COE0084 - The cost of energy

The cost of energy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Attendance statistics - Member attendance (Session 2024-25)

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Oral Evidence - Western Gateway, RSPB Cymru, and School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Oral Evidence - Severn Estuary Commission, Severn Estuary Commission, and Severn Estuary Commission

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 14th May 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister for Energy relating to the energy code reform consultation, dated 2 May 2025

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 14th May 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister for Energy relating to two publications on reforms to strengthen our electricity security and support decarbonisation, dated 6 May 2025

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 14th May 2025
Written Evidence - Energy4All
COM0159 - Unlocking community energy at scale

Unlocking community energy at scale - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 14th May 2025
Written Evidence - Your Energy Your Way
WFP0140 - Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy

Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 14th May 2025
Estimate memoranda - Ofgem Main Estimate Memorandum 2025–26

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 14th May 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair of the Western Gateway Partnership and the Chair of the Severn Estuary Commission relating to oral evidence session 5 May 2025, dated 8 May 2025

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Tuesday 13th May 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and Department for Energy Security and Net Zero

Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Tuesday 13th May 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and Department for Energy Security and Net Zero

Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 21st May 2025
Written Evidence - Northern Powergrid
WFP0141 - Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy

Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 21st May 2025
Estimate memoranda - Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Main Estimate Memorandum 2025-26

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 21st May 2025
Estimate memoranda - UKAEA Pension Schemes Main Estimate Memorandum 2025-26

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 21st May 2025
Estimate memoranda - Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Main Estimate Memorandum 2025-26 Table

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 21st May 2025
Oral Evidence - National Infrastructure Planning Association, Aeos Infrastructure Planning, and Suffolk County Council

National planning for energy infrastructure - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 21st May 2025
Oral Evidence - Britain Remade, Campaign for Protection of Rural England, and Royal Society for the Protection of Birds

National planning for energy infrastructure - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Thursday 22nd May 2025
Report - 1st Report - Retrofitting homes for net zero

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 21st May 2025
Oral Evidence - Energy UK, Island Green Power, and RWE Renewables

National planning for energy infrastructure - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 21st May 2025
Oral Evidence - Energy Networks Associaiton, National Grid Electricity Transmission, and National Energy System Operator (NESO)

National planning for energy infrastructure - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee