Investigatory Powers Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Investigatory Powers Bill

Lord West of Spithead Excerpts
Wednesday 27th April 2016

(8 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I note what the noble Lord says, but the Apple case was one of some complexity. The court order that was eventually granted was in fact superseded because a third party came forward and provided the Federal Bureau of Investigation with access to the relevant material. The Apple case of course raised very real questions about the scope of responsibility of communications providers, and that is what this Bill seeks urgently to address. The providers have responsibilities to the public—not just the public to whom they provide their initial services.

Lord West of Spithead Portrait Lord West of Spithead (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, in support of my noble friend Lord Rooker, I ask the Minister this. In the final analysis, is it not absolutely essential—no matter what the complexities—that we do not allow criminals, terrorists, paedophiles, to exchange data, plan, and swap photographs in an area where there is no possibility of scrutiny by law enforcement agencies? Whatever happens, we must enable ourselves to monitor that, or else we are all less safe.

Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I entirely concur with the noble Lord. There must be no dark pools in which these criminals and terrorists can operate.