Cybersecurity: Encryption Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord West of Spithead

Main Page: Lord West of Spithead (Labour - Life peer)

Cybersecurity: Encryption

Lord West of Spithead Excerpts
Tuesday 27th October 2015

(8 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Shields Portrait Baroness Shields
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Prime Minister did not advocate banning encryption; he expressed concern that many companies are building end-to-end encrypted applications and services and not retaining the keys. The Prime Minister has repeatedly said that there cannot be a safe place for terrorists, criminals and paedophiles to operate freely, with impunity and beyond the reach of law. This is not about creating back doors; this is about companies being able to access communications on their network when presented with a warrant.

Lord West of Spithead Portrait Lord West of Spithead (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, recently, ISIL has been using WhatsApp as part of attacks in Iraq and we have seen terrorists get more on to the net than ever in the past. I understand the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Strasburger, but is it not absolutely essential that we have the law enforcement capability, legally controlled, to be able to get access so that no enemies of the state who wish to destroy us and kill our people are able to operate in an environment where they know that they will never be monitored by law enforcement?

Baroness Shields Portrait Baroness Shields
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord raises a very important point. There is an alarming movement towards end-to-end encrypted applications, such as those that he mentioned. It is absolutely essential that these companies which understand and build those stacks of technology are able to decrypt that information and provide it to law enforcement in extremis.