Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Stewartby
Main Page: Lord Stewartby (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Stewartby's debates with the HM Treasury
(11 years, 2 months ago)
Lords ChamberI did not say that I necessarily accepted the Government's conclusion: I was merely testing the Government on the logic of their own position.
My Lords, I came in this afternoon hoping for enlightenment. I received much more and varied judgment expressed from all corners of the House. But the one thing that everything leads to is an assumption that the ring-fence will not work and I am afraid to say that I agree. I do not say that with any satisfaction. A lot of time and effort has been put into this by very well-informed people, but it is against the ethos of the institutions and the markets in which they operate.
To say that we are going forward as an experiment is merely an attempt to sum up where we have got to in this afternoon's debate. We cannot just leave it like that. If there is generally—not just in this House but in a more widespread way—fundamental doubt about whether something as important as this will work, we have to assess whether we are bound to follow that structure. All I have heard so far leads me to think that ring-fencing is not workable. We ought to accept that situation as soon as possible. I leave it to others to follow more logically what I have rather stumblingly set out.