Personal Independence Payment and Universal Credit

Debate between Lord Shinkwin and Baroness Sherlock

Monday 2nd November 2026 Lords Chamber

[Lord Shinkwin (Con) [R]]

My Lords, one of the greatest threats to PIP and, for example, Motability—I declare an interest as a beneficiary—is the growing resentment among the public at the seemingly inexorable extension of eligibility, over which, I should add, Motability has no say. What measures are the Government taking to reduce eligibility and thereby put PIP on a sustainable footing for those who need it most?

[Baroness Sherlock (Lab)]

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for his question. I have already said what we are doing, but, just for example, the Milburn review is looking at the position of young people, because almost 1 million—one in eight—of our young people are not in employment, education or training, and a growing number of those are on the grounds of sickness, disability or the inability to work. We also have a growing number of people across the age range who are simply not able to work. We need to make sure that the system supports them and gets them into work. The Milburn review will look at young people. The Timms review, by my right honourable friend Stephen Timms, is reviewing whether PIP is fit for purpose—the interim report suggests that it is not. Both reports will be coming out this month, the Government will respond soon after that and we will be legislating in the new year.

Unemployment: People with Autism

Debate between Lord Shinkwin and Baroness Sherlock

Thursday 25th June 2026 Lords Chamber

[Lord Shinkwin (Con) [V]]

My Lords, I speak as the co-chair of the APPG on disability employment. One initiative that would benefit people with autism and disabled people in general, and which was in both the Labour manifesto and the 2024 King’s Speech, is an equality, ethnicity and disability Bill. Yet the Bill was pulled from the latest King’s Speech at the last minute by No. 10, despite the Bill manager, whom I met, having been appointed. Does the Minister appreciate the huge disappointment that this inexplicable decision has caused, and will she make every effort to ensure that the Government introduce the Bill in this session?

[Baroness Sherlock (Lab)]

The noble Lord raises an important point. I reassure him that the Government are completely committed to delivering on the manifesto commitment to introduce mandatory ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting for large employers. I know that my colleagues in the Cabinet Office are working hard on this and will introduce legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows. There is always competition for Bills in the Session, but I know that they are still committed to it. In March, as the noble Lord probably knows, the pay gap reporting consultation was published, showing how the proposed approach would work. Employers with 250 or more employees would have to report their workforce composition and ethnicity and disability pay gaps and take action to address that. It is very hard to solve something if we do not know the scale of the problem. I reassure him that the Government will do this as soon as possible.