Crime and Policing Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office
Wednesday 25th February 2026

(1 day, 6 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
On the amendments before the House today, I hope I have given supportive words to some, clarification on others and indicated that there are amendments the Government cannot support. I remind the House that all this is done for a purpose: to prevent anti-social behaviour and support the growth of our town centres. I commend Amendment 4, in my name, to the House and ask colleagues to not to press their amendments.
Lord Sentamu Portrait Lord Sentamu (CB)
- Hansard - -

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister. Nobody doubts or questions that addressing anti-social behaviour is a manifesto commitment; that is taken as read. However, if it is a manifesto commitment, it must be put in words that clearly describe what the Government are trying to say. I find it quite baffling that in their first amendment, the Government prefer the words, “just and convenient”. What is convenient in there? Why are the Government dressing it up? I would have thought that the normal language of “necessary and proportionate” is much easier to understand. Why are the Government rejecting words that will help deal with anti-social behaviour, and instead fishing for other words that make no sense? Can the Minister try to make sense of it for me? I was given an explanation, but I was not persuaded, and I am sure I am not the only one. The words that we know in the Human Rights Act—necessary and proportionate —would ease the fear that the police will go on a spree and do a number of things because they judge it to be “just and convenient”.

Lord Hanson of Flint Portrait Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As ever, I am genuinely sorry that I have not been able to persuade the noble and right reverend Lord of the Government’s case. We have taken the view that “just and convenient” mirrors the civil injunction regime of the 2014 Act, passed by a Conservative and Liberal Democrat Government. They are not words from a Labour Minister but from an Act passed in 2014 that we are mirroring in the Government’s manifesto commitment to introduce respect orders. I am sorry that I cannot convince the noble and right reverend Lord of that, and that I have not persuaded him accordingly. We may—although I do not know—very shortly have an opportunity to see whether anybody else is persuaded.