Lord Sentamu
Main Page: Lord Sentamu (Crossbench - Life peer)Football Governance Bill [HL]
Lord Sentamu ExcerptsWednesday 27th November 2024
(1 day, 20 hours ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Football Governance Bill [HL] 2024-26 View all Football Governance Bill [HL] 2024-26 Debates Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Amendment Paper: HL Bill 41-I(a) Amendments for Committee (Supplementary to the Marshalled List) - (26 Nov 2024)
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab)
That point was made earlier. I would not say every game is competitive, but I take the noble Lord’s point. I do not want to say any more at this stage because it is important that we get some clarity on how we go forward after this initial debate, because there are many important sections of the Bill that we need to look at in detail. The regulator will have a role, and we have to use this to make sure that it is absolutely clear. Some of the issues raised by noble Lords are legitimate, and until we can have our debates on each of these, we cannot quite see what shape this Bill and the role of the regulator will have. I thank noble Lords for the points made, and I think there are a lot of issues that we will follow up.
Lord Sentamu (CB)
My Lords, if we do not get up to Amendment 36, we have a big job ahead of us, so I am going to be very brief.
Take the BBC. The director-general, the chair and the board really try to work hard to meet its objectives. It is there to entertain, to inform, to educate—and those objectives live in the same organisation. I do not know why, in the same way, the regulator cannot see its job as one of sustainability and success as well as growth.