Debates between Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton and Tim Loughton during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton and Tim Loughton
Monday 16th April 2012

(12 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton Portrait Mark Lancaster (Milton Keynes North) (Con)
- Hansard - -

17. What steps he is taking to speed up the adoption system.

Tim Loughton Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education (Tim Loughton)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I said earlier, the Government have published “An Action Plan for Adoption”, which aims to reduce delays in adoption by legislating to prevent local authorities from spending too much time seeking a perfect adoptive match; accelerating the assessment process for prospective adopters; and making it easier for children to be fostered by their likely eventual adopters in certain circumstances. We will also shortly introduce an adoption scorecard to focus attention on the issue of timeliness; this is linked to a tougher intervention regime.

Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton Portrait Mark Lancaster
- Hansard - -

I commend the Government on the action they have taken to speed up the adoption process, but concerns remain about the level of support provided to families after that process. Will the Minister therefore expand on the action the Government will be taking to support families once they have actually adopted?

Tim Loughton Portrait Tim Loughton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend raises a very important point, which was covered slightly in my earlier answer. I am concerned about getting good pre-adoption support, peri-adoption support and post-adoption support, because the worst thing that can happen is a breakdown in adoption. There is scant evidence about breakdown in adoptions, but some of the highest-performing adoption agencies in the country, be they local authority or independent, are those that invest in adoption support, which means that adoptions do not break down. That results in not only a financial saving for that authority, but, more importantly, a social gain for the child, who gets a safe, stable and loving home—permanently.