Sex Offenders Register Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Sex Offenders Register

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Excerpts
Thursday 17th March 2011

(13 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked By
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Portrait Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the statement repeated by Baroness Neville-Jones on 16 February (HL Deb, cols. 714–15) on the sex offenders register, to what extent the statement took account of ministers’ duty to uphold the independence of the judiciary under section 3 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005.

Baroness Neville-Jones Portrait The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Neville-Jones)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, Ministers are fully mindful of their duty under the Act. HMG took account of their duty to uphold the independence of the judiciary by taking steps to remedy the incompatibility identified by the court.

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Portrait Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for that Answer. It is clearly right that we do everything we can to protect the public from sex offenders, but does she accept that the Home Secretary went too far when she described an eminently reasonable judgment of the Supreme Court as appalling? Has her right honourable friend the Home Secretary been reprimanded by the Lord Chancellor and, if not, why not?

Baroness Neville-Jones Portrait Baroness Neville-Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I should like to make two points in response to that. First, there was real public anxiety about some of the potential consequences of the judgment, which was being reflected by the Government. The Government have taken appropriate action to meet the court’s judgment and to protect the public interest. Secondly, the Lord Chancellor has no doubt spoken to his colleagues.