Information between 1st March 2026 - 11th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 161 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 181 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 146 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 132 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 145 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 158 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 183 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 185 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 151 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 172 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 117 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 40 Noes - 123 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath speeches from: Crown Estate: Wales
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath contributed 1 speech (46 words) Monday 9th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath speeches from: Energy Markets
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath contributed 1 speech (96 words) Monday 9th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath speeches from: Carbon Budget 6
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath contributed 1 speech (66 words) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath speeches from: Assisted Dying Legislation: Isle of Man and Jersey
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath contributed 1 speech (148 words) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Healthwatch England
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Monday 2nd March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the independence of Healthwatch England from the Care Quality Commission; and what discussions the Care Quality Commission has had with Healthwatch England about its abolition. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) both recognise the independent statutory role of Healthwatch England (HWE) in championing the views of those who use health and care services. Although the Health and Social Care Act 2012 established HWE as a statutory committee of the CQC, HWE sets its own priorities, has its own brand identity, and speaks with an independent voice. This arrangement is set out in the CQC’s formal framework agreement with the Department. Following the Government’s commitment in the 10-Year Health Plan to incorporate the functions of HWE into a new Patient Experience Directorate within the Department, the CQC has been working closely with HWE on all aspects of a closure programme. This work includes engaging with relevant trade unions and regular meetings to plan for the abolishment of HWE in its current format. |
|
Healthwatch England
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Monday 2nd March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of how the Care Quality Commission has enabled Healthwatch England to set the direction of its own work. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) both recognise the independent statutory role of Healthwatch England (HWE) in championing the views of those who use health and care services. Although the Health and Social Care Act 2012 established HWE as a statutory committee of the CQC, HWE sets its own priorities, has its own brand identity, and speaks with an independent voice. This arrangement is set out in the CQC’s formal framework agreement with the Department. Following the Government’s commitment in the 10-Year Health Plan to incorporate the functions of HWE into a new Patient Experience Directorate within the Department, the CQC has been working closely with HWE on all aspects of a closure programme. This work includes engaging with relevant trade unions and regular meetings to plan for the abolishment of HWE in its current format. |
|
Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Monday 2nd March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the causes of variations in reported prevalence of placenta accreta spectrum; and whether this reflects under-detection and under-recording of the condition in England. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) We have not made an assessment of the causes of variations in the reported prevalence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). NHS England does not currently collect national data on PAS prevalence or outcomes. Through the national audit into maternal mortality, Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK will report on PAS-associated deaths later this year. The National Institute for Health and Care Research and the Government funded PRiSMM programme will be reporting on PAS by region within the national maternal morbidity surveillance system. |
|
Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Monday 2nd March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to introduce a nationally accredited and mandatory placenta accreta spectrum training programme for sonographers, obstetricians and relevant maternity staff. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department and NHS England expect midwives, sonographers, and obstetricians to follow national guidance described by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists for the diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). There are no plans to introduce mandatory training for all sonographers and obstetricians in how to diagnose PAS. In the instance of women delivering with PAS, surgeons and anaesthetists in all obstetric hospitals are trained to deal with complex operative findings as well as the management of post-partum haemorrhage. This will be strengthened further through the implementation of the recently published Maternal Care Bundle, which includes an element focussed on optimal management of obstetric haemorrhage.
|
|
Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Monday 2nd March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure that clinicians receive placenta accreta spectrum diagnostic training. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department and NHS England expect midwives, sonographers, and obstetricians to follow national guidance described by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists for the diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). There are no plans to introduce mandatory training for all sonographers and obstetricians in how to diagnose PAS. In the instance of women delivering with PAS, surgeons and anaesthetists in all obstetric hospitals are trained to deal with complex operative findings as well as the management of post-partum haemorrhage. This will be strengthened further through the implementation of the recently published Maternal Care Bundle, which includes an element focussed on optimal management of obstetric haemorrhage.
|
|
Community Health Services: Standards
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 5th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps are being taken by NHS England to improve the performance of integrated care boards that are making inadequate progress in increasing funding for community care. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Community health services are a fundamental part of the health and care system and an essential building block in developing a neighbourhood health service. We know people are waiting too long for community services. That is why, for the first time, we have set a clear target for systems to work to reduce long waits in NHS England’s Medium-Term Planning Framework. The Medium Term Planning Framework outlines how integrated care boards (ICBs) should strengthen community services in line with the left shift ambitions set out in the 10-Year Health Plan. Specifically, it asks that in 2026/27 all ICBs: - increase community health service capacity to meet growth in demand, expected to be approximately 3% nationally per year; - actively manage long waits for community health services, reducing the proportion of waits over 18 weeks and developing a plan to eliminate all 52-week waits. As part of the medium term planning process, ICBs should ensure community health services are adequately funded to meet these targets, and must submit plans which set out how they will implement this ambition. NHS England is currently in the process of assuring these plans and will continue to monitor their implementation. To support the shift to neighbourhood health, we published in 2025 an overview of the core community health services, called Standardising Community Health Services, that ICBs should consider when planning for their local populations to support improved commissioning and delivery of community health services, a vital part of neighbourhood health. Further guidance was published in February 2026, providing more detailed descriptions of the core components of community health services for ICBs. Codifying community health services will help to better assess demand and capacity. It will also help commissioners make investment choices as they design neighbourhood health provision that shifts care to community-based settings. |
|
Community Health Services: Standards
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 5th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what measures they have put in place to enable assessment of the performance of integrated care boards in prioritising community care services. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Community health services are a fundamental part of the health and care system and an essential building block in developing a neighborhood health service. We know people are waiting too long for community services. That is why, for the first time, we have set a clear target for systems to work to reduce long waits in NHS England’s Medium-Term Planning Framework. The Medium Term Planning Framework outlines how integrated care boards (ICBs) should strengthen community services in line with the left shift ambitions set out in the 10-Year Health Plan. Specifically, it asks that in 2026/27 all ICBs: - increase community health service capacity to meet growth in demand, expected to be approximately 3% nationally per year; and - actively manage long waits for community health services, reducing the proportion of waits over 18 weeks and developing a plan to eliminate all 52-week waits. As part of the medium term planning process, and to hold the system to account, ICBs have to submit plans which set out how they will implement this ambition. NHS England is currently in the process of assuring these plans and will continue to monitor their implementation. To support the shift to neighbourhood health, we published in 2025 an overview of the core community health services, called Standardising Community Health Services, that ICBs should consider when planning for their local populations to support improved commissioning and delivery of community health services, a vital part of neighbourhood health. Further guidance was published in February 2026, providing more detailed descriptions of the core components of community health services for ICBs. Codifying community health services will help to better assess demand and capacity. It will also help commissioners make investment choices as they design neighbourhood health provision that shifts care to community-based settings. |
|
Integrated Care Boards: Finance
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the (1) number and (2) scale of deficits currently being reported by integrated care boards. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England publishes regular updates on the financial performance of all National Health Service organisations in both their quarterly Oversight Framework segmentation league tables and their monthly board papers. At month nine (M9), the end of December 2025, there are year to date overspends across NHS systems totalling £445 million, reflecting the impact of held back deficit support funding. Six systems account for more than half of this overspend, while 17 systems were delivering in line with their financial plans at that point in the year. Further details can be found in the M9 Financial Position 2025/26 update to the February NHS England board on the NHS England website. |
|
Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish a comprehensive list of NHS-commissioned placenta accreta spectrum specialist centres that have been established since 2020, including the (1) location, and (2) referral pathways, of each centre. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England regional teams, in conjunction with their local integrated care boards as the responsible commissioners, are leading on commissioning specialised placenta accreta spectrum centres within their geographies. The treating clinician, in consultation with the patient, will advise on referral routes for patients under their care. Areas with NHS-commissioned placenta accreta spectrum specialist centres: London:
East of England:
North East Yorkshire and Humber:
South West:
East Midlands:
West Midlands:
|
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Crime and Policing Bill
158 speeches (30,484 words) 3rd reading part two Wednesday 4th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: None The noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, and my noble friend Lord Alderdice, with all their relevant - Link to Speech |