Information between 17th September 2025 - 27th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 138 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 111 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hunt of Kings Heath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath contributed 8 speeches (1,221 words) Committee stage part two Wednesday 17th September 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Brownfield Sites: Biodiversity
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 23rd September 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to publish the outcome of the consultation on improving the implementation of biodiversity net gain for minor, medium and brownfield development. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government is carefully considering responses to the consultation on ‘Improving the Implementation of Biodiversity Net Gain for Minor, Medium and Brownfield Development’ and will publish a Government response in due course. |
|
Boris Johnson
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 25th September 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the extent to which the former Prime Minister, Boris Johnson followed the advice given by the Advisory Committee on Business Appointment in April 2024 in relation to a paid role with Better Earth, in particular the advice that he should not personally lobby contacts that he made while in office for a period of two years after leaving office. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Chapter 11 of the Ministerial Code sets out the obligations on leaving office, including in relation to the Business Appointment Rules. The obligation is on former ministers to abide by the advice they receive about any outside appointment or employment they wish to take up within two years of leaving office.
|
|
Transplant Surgery
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 8th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will ensure that, following the abolition of NHS England, responsibility for the commissioning of transplant services in the NHS will become the direct responsibility of the Department of Health and Social Care. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England is the national commissioner for all solid organ transplant services, excluding renal transplant services, which were delegated to integrated care boards (ICBs) from April 2025 as part of a wider programme of work to delegate to ICBs. Further information on this delegation is available on the NHS.UK website, in an online only format. As part of the ongoing work to integrate NHS England’s functions into the Department, future plans are being considered for specialised services, such as transplantation, for which NHS England is currently accountable. This work will take account of Organ Utilisation Group recommendation 12, which highlights the ongoing need for robust national level oversight of transplant services. Further information on the Organ Utilisation Group is available on the NHS.UK website, in an online only format. |
|
Former Prime Ministers: Public Duty Costs Allowance
Asked by: Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what procedures are in place to ensure that money paid to former Prime Ministers under the Public Duty Costs Allowance are properly spent; and whether they have made an assessment of the appropriate use of money received from that allowance by Boris Johnson. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Public Duty Costs Allowance policy states that former Prime Ministers or their staff may only be reimbursed for actual administrative costs incurred in meeting the demands of the former Prime Minister’s public life up to the annual limit.
Invoices are submitted to Cabinet Office Finance by the offices of the former Prime Ministers in order to claim their Public Duty Cost Allowance. Along with the invoice offices provide evidence of what the claim is to be used for.
The PDCA is reviewed by the NAO as part of their audit of the Cabinet Office Annual Report and Accounts.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
17 Sep 2025, 9:29 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath not moved. The question is that clause 89 stand part of the bill. As many are of that opinion say, "Content", and of " Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Sep 2025, 9:23 p.m. - House of Lords "about by the experts. I don't expect the Minister to be up to our school touched by answer or comment on that, I just like it up. I see Lord that, I just like it up. I see Lord Hunt of Kings Heath nodding at that and I glad we are in agreement on this point. " Lord Blencathra (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Sep 2025, 9:01 p.m. - House of Lords "specifically to address amendment 346DG. And could I say at the outset that I agree with much of what the Noble Lord Lord Ravensdale and Lord Hunt of Kings Heath comments in the " Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Sep 2025, 9:50 p.m. - House of Lords "of the contrary, "Not content". The "Contents" have it. Amendment 356 a Lord Hunt of Kings Heath. " Baroness Young of Old Scone (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Sep 2025, 9:50 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath. >> We are nearly at the finish, all I want to do is make a plea to my noble friend to consider the benefit " Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Sep 2025, 9:53 p.m. - House of Lords ">> I'm grateful to Lord Hunt of Kings Heath for bringing forward M23 fighters six a for the consideration " Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2025, 8:24 p.m. - House of Lords "day one of the committee stage on the 17th of July by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, and I spoke in support " Viscount Hanworth (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
78 speeches (19,939 words) Report stage part two Monday 20th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Viscount Hanworth (Lab - Excepted Hereditary) amendment, Amendment 52, was moved on day one in Committee on 17 July by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath - Link to Speech |
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
222 speeches (48,096 words) Committee stage part two Wednesday 17th September 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Lord Fuller (Con - Life peer) I am delighted to see the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, in his place. - Link to Speech 2: Lord Ravensdale (XB - Excepted Hereditary) Amendment 350 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, proposes some minor changes to - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Lab - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Ravensdale, and my noble friend Lord Hunt of Kings Heath have tabled a number of - Link to Speech 4: Lord Ravensdale (XB - Excepted Hereditary) Very briefly, I follow on from the point of the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath. - Link to Speech 5: Lord Blencathra (Con - Life peer) I see the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, nodding, and I am glad that we agree on this point. - Link to Speech |