Great British Nuclear: Modular Reactors

Lord Howell of Guildford Excerpts
Monday 2nd December 2024

(2 days, 19 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Kennedy of Southwark Portrait Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Lab Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We will hear from the noble Baroness first, then the noble Lord.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Portrait Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, security is one of the key considerations not just on SMRs but on AMRs.

Lord Howell of Guildford Portrait Lord Howell of Guildford (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, there is a puzzle here. If the world acknowledges that SMRs and like designs can be built far more quickly than the larger-gigawatt traditional nuclear power stations, and if investors can be attracted to finance those SMRs—whereas the giants such as Sizewell, the so-called replica, will cost billions that will eventually fall on consumers and taxpayers—why are we not giving far more priority to ordering and developing SMRs and smaller reactors, as many other countries are doing? Many producers are finding that their order books are becoming full.

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath Portrait Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I think the noble Lord paints too bleak a position. The UK is very well placed in relation to SMRs, and the programme that GBN is taking forward is being watched with great interest by a number of countries. In relation to investment, as the chair of GBN, Simon Bowen, told the energy Select Committee last week, of course there are issues to do with risk, timing and potential delays with first-in-class designs. But as we gain momentum and produce more modular reactors, the efficiency of the programme will get better and better. That is why we have to give support at this stage, and why we see huge potential.