Justice: Non-custodial Sentences Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Justice: Non-custodial Sentences

Lord Campbell-Savours Excerpts
Thursday 23rd January 2014

(10 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours Portrait Lord Campbell-Savours
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of non-custodial sentences on the safety of the public.

Lord Faulks Portrait The Minister of State, Ministry of Justice (Lord Faulks) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, those who commit serious and dangerous offences should expect to receive long custodial sentences and this Government have ensured that tough sentences are available. Less serious offenders can be effectively and safely punished in the community. However, we have amended the law so that sentences served in the community combine punishment with effective rehabilitation. Since 2010, those who break the law are more likely to go to prison, and to go to prison for longer.

Lord Campbell-Savours Portrait Lord Campbell-Savours (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I find that very hard to believe. How can the Government claim to be tough on crime when a Ministry of Justice Answer in the other place revealed that in 2012, of 16,000 criminals convicted of rape, sexual assault, manslaughter, grievous bodily harm and robbery, all crimes characterised by violence, according to the government figures 9,600 of them—that is, 60%—walked free without even a custodial sentence and sometimes without even a tag, while nearly 40% of those convicted actually served less than 24 months in prison? These are serious crimes. How can people feel safe in their home or on the streets of Britain in the light of these statistics?