Information between 27th June 2025 - 7th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
30 Jun 2025 - UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 205 |
30 Jun 2025 - Marking of Retail Goods Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 12 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 17 Noes - 9 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 93 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 23 Noes - 103 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 112 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 45 Noes - 126 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 176 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 230 Noes - 137 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 150 |
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 196 |
3 Jul 2025 - Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 74 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 16 Noes - 144 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 243 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 55 Noes - 234 |
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 263 |
Written Answers |
---|
Deportation
Asked by: Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 4 June (HL7632), whether breaching a deportation order constitutes a specific criminal offence; and if so, on what basis the provision of information on the number of such breaches meets the criterion for disproportionate costs. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) It is a criminal offence under section 24(A1) of the Immigration Act 1971 to knowingly enter the United Kingdom in breach of a deportation order. The offence attracts a maximum sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment. When assessing breaches of the disproportionate cost threshold, consideration is given to the volume of case records that would need to be reviewed and the time it would take to review those cases which is calculated at a flat rate of £25 per hour. |
Deportation
Asked by: Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 4 June (HL7632), how many people who have been deported from the United Kingdom after (1) asylum application refusal, or (2) completion of a prison sentence, have returned to the UK (a) as illegal entrants in breach of their deportation arrangements, and (b) following completion of a sentence overseas, in the past year. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The requested data is not currently available from published statistics, and the relevant data could only be collated and verified for the purpose of answering this question at disproportionate cost. |
Prescriptions: Fees and Charges
Asked by: Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour - Life peer) Friday 4th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what was the total cost of providing free prescriptions of colostomy and ileostomy related products in 2023–24. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) It is not possible to estimate the total cost to the National Health Service of providing free prescriptions for colostomy and ileostomy related products. NHS patients pay a fixed charge for each prescription item dispensed in primary care, unless they are exempt from prescription charges or hold a valid pre-payment certificate (PPC). In 2023/24, there was a total of 1,299,650 items with a total Net Ingredient Cost (NIC) of £239,280,020 dispensed to patients in the community in England, where the item prescribed was clearly named as colostomy or ileostomy appliances, for which no NHS charges were collected at the point of dispensing. This total includes items where no charge was collected due to a patient holding a valid PPC. This total excludes a large number of other stoma appliances that could not be clearly identified as colostomy or ileostomy from their name, although some of these other appliances will be used as colostomy or ileostomy appliances. The NIC is the basic price of a product excluding VAT. It does not take account of discounts, dispensing costs, fees, or allowances paid to pharmacists and appliance contractors for the services they provide to the NHS, or prescription charge income received, where the single charge or PPC fee is paid, or foregone where prescriptions are dispensed free of charge. |
Deposited Papers |
---|
Monday 7th July 2025
Source Page: Letter dated 03/07/2025 from Lord Katz to Lord Campbell-Savours regarding a supplementary question raised during a question on the risks posed by abandoned and derelict vessels in rivers and estuaries: division of responsibilities between landowners and authorities for removals and whether there is a lacuna in the law. 2p. Document: Letter_from_Lord_Katz_to_Lord_Campbell-Savours_-_3_July_2025.pdf (PDF) Found: Letter dated 03/07/2025 from Lord Katz to Lord Campbell-Savours regarding a supplementary question raised |