Lord Cameron of Lochiel
Main Page: Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Cameron of Lochiel's debates with the Home Office
(1 day, 21 hours ago)
Lords Chamber Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Con)
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, both military sites proposed to house asylum seekers have significant local consequences. Cameron barracks in Inverness is close to the city centre, and local communities there are rightly concerned about the lack of consultation with them about such a major proposal. Crowborough army training camp in East Sussex is used by a large number of cadet forces, who will now be deprived of its use. Of course, if the Government truly wanted to clear the asylum backlog and close more asylum hotels, they would ban asylum claims from migrants entering the country illegally and deport them. Can the Minister say why the Government would prefer to move asylum seekers to sensitive sites—which have just as large an impact on local communities—rather than take real action to solve the problem?
 The Minister of State, Home Office (Lord Hanson of Flint) (Lab)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            The Minister of State, Home Office (Lord Hanson of Flint) (Lab) 
        
    
        
    
        I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Cameron, for his question. The local authorities in both areas were informed two weeks ago, and we are continuing to ensure that we discuss the arrangements to date with the police, the National Health Service and local councils in each area. The Government are trying to do what I hope the noble Lord wishes the Government to do, which is to put a deterrent in place. The individuals who will be going to these sites in a phased, operational way, over a period of time, will have arrived, been processed and been put into those sites pending asylum decisions being taken. That is a real deterrent to people: it is not about going to a hotel or into the community—they are going to a very firm site where action can be taken. It is our ambition to reduce the number of hotels, and we have reduced the number from 400 at its peak to 200 now. It is our ambition to stop the crossings that are leading to these pressures in the first place. I look forward to the noble Lord’s support on both matters.