Amendment of the Law Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury
Thursday 24th March 2011

(13 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jesse Norman Portrait Jesse Norman (Hereford and South Herefordshire) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am not sure quite which hallucinogenic substances are being ingested on the Opposition Benches, but if I may ask a question—

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - -

Order. I think that we will reconsider the suggestion about drug taking.

Jesse Norman Portrait Jesse Norman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am happy to withdraw the suggestion and to make it clear that the substances in question were not hallucinogenic. May I simply ask the shadow Chancellor—

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

Order. Is there a suggestion that my ruling was wrong?

Jesse Norman Portrait Jesse Norman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

indicated dissent.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

I take it that you have withdrawn the suggestion, Mr Norman. I accept that. Are you now going to pose a very quick question?

Jesse Norman Portrait Jesse Norman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the shadow Chancellor enlighten us on why WPP left this country under the last Administration, and why it has now returned, as has been announced in the news today?

--- Later in debate ---
Chuka Umunna Portrait Mr Umunna
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will give way shortly.

I have come to the Chamber from this morning’s Treasury Committee sitting, where I asked Jonathan Portes, who until February was chief economist at the Cabinet Office, about this issue. I asked him whether abolishing the right to request flexible working for the parents of 17-year-olds would make a big difference in increasing GDP or growth. He made it very clear that scrapping the extension will “do nothing for growth”. I then asked HSBC’s chief economist whether he would be revising his GDP figures as a result of the scrapping of the measure, and he told me that he would not.

This measure seems to be a gimmick, which tends to suggest that the Government think that watering down employee rights is a substitute for a properly thought out growth strategy. All the figures I have just presented and all the arguments I have just made for the introduction of the extension, which was planned for April, are in the Government’s own impact assessment of the measure. Will the Government think again about it? I grant that they do not and will not accept our arguments to revise their plan for fiscal consolidation, but I suggest that it would be very wise for them to think again on this small measure.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - -

I call Gavin Williamson, who has until 5.42 pm—about three minutes. I am sorry about that.