Animal Testing
Lee Pitcher Excerpts(1 week, 1 day ago)
Westminster HallRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.
Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.
This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record
Lee Pitcher (Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) (Lab)
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Twigg. I believe that the time has come to end animal testing in this country, and to do so with urgency, ambition and honesty. This debate has rightly been driven by the public. Some 152 residents across Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme have joined others across the country to tell us that the status quo is no longer acceptable, and I agree. Over 2.6 million animal procedures took place in Great Britain in 2024, and behind that number are living creatures capable of pain and distress. We cannot simply look away from that anymore.
Like many Members, I am an animal lover. At home, our dog, Foggy, is part of the family—thank God he is. He is the only one still happy to see me when I get home on a Thursday night, and he is also the only one, along with my mum, that listens in to see whether my voice comes on when a debate is on the TV. If he is listening now, I want my slippers back; they were not there this morning, and he needs to dig them out for me.
My children have always struggled to understand why we treat some animals with love and protection, while others are used in ways that cause harm—frankly, so do many adults. I recognise that animal testing has historically played a role in medical advances, but the scientific landscape is now rapidly changing, and there are many other emerging options out there. Human-specific technologies, from advanced cell models to computer simulations, are already providing credible and, in some cases, more accurate alternatives.
This is not a question of whether we can move away from animal testing, but of whether we have the political will to lead that transition. The principle of replacement, reduction and refinement has taken us some of the way, but it is no longer enough. We need a fourth R: replacement at pace. We need a clear, time-bound strategy to phase out animal testing wherever alternatives exist and to drive innovation where they do not. That means scaling up investment in non-animal methods, fast-tracking their validation so that regulators can rely on them, and using the full weight of Government to remove barriers to their adoption. It also means being prepared to challenge outdated regulatory requirements that still default to animal testing even when better options are available.
This Labour Government have rightly placed growth, science and innovation at the heart of their agenda. There is a real opportunity for Britain to lead the world in ethical science, creating high-value jobs while ending practices that the public increasingly reject. Leadership requires clarity, however: we should set a clear national mission to end animal testing, with milestones, accountability and transparency built in—not warm words, but measurable progress.
The testing of cosmetic products and their ingredients on animals was banned in the UK in 1998, and the testing of completed household products was banned in 2015. Today I support Herbie’s law, a bold step towards a future where animals are no longer used in the name of science. The law would prompt a decade of change, mandating the replacement of animals in medical research in the UK with humane, effective alternatives by 2035. It is a commitment to progress, compassion and a brighter future for all. We can do that—we should do that—and now we must get on and deliver it.
It is said, “A true friend leaves pawprints on your heart”. We need to use our heads and hearts to stop testing on dogs immediately, and then move on to deliver Herbie’s law.
Oral Answers to Questions
Lee Pitcher Excerpts(1 year, 2 months ago)
Commons ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Luke Taylor (Sutton and Cheam) (LD)
Lee Pitcher (Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) (Lab)
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Stephanie Peacock)
This Government recognise the value and importance of grassroots sports clubs in London and across the country, and the role that their facilities play in getting people active. Sport England invests more than £250 million of lottery and Government funding each year in the communities that need it most. On top of that, our multi-sport grassroots facilities programme has invested £123 million across the UK this year.
Stephanie Peacock
Those are issues that I have heard in my own constituency. I would be delighted to meet him and will perhaps set up a meeting with the Football Foundation too.
Lee Pitcher
Last week, I met the fantastic Thorne Colliery club in my constituency of Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme, which is working with the Football Foundation on potential investment for its pitch, which is based on the Moorends welfare site. While that is a fantastic example of the support available for grassroots facilities, many clubs still face uncertainty due to governance and financial challenges. Will the Minister outline what steps are being taken to ensure that football governance reforms provide greater security for grassroots clubs and the facilities that they rely on?
Stephanie Peacock
I agree with my hon. Friend that local grassroots clubs have a crucial part to play in delivering wider societal benefits, fostering social cohesion and building a strong sense of local identity. The Football Association is responsible for good governance at this level, and its new grassroots strategy, launched in the autumn, looks to set clubs up for success.