Lee Pitcher Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lee Pitcher

Information between 8th November 2025 - 18th November 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context
Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 305 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318


Speeches
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Cabinet Office
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (49 words)
Monday 17th November 2025 - Written Corrections
Cabinet Office
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Rogue Builders
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (82 words)
Thursday 13th November 2025 - Westminster Hall
Department for Business and Trade
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Nolan Principles
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (46 words)
Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office


Written Answers
Bus Services: Franchises
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme)
Monday 17th November 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of bus franchising on community connectivity in rural villages.

Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Government is committed to delivering better bus services, including in rural areas. We have set out a plan to achieve this based on giving local leaders the powers they need and empowering them to choose the service model that works best in their area, whether that be franchising, strengthened Enhanced Partnerships, or local authority bus companies.

Under franchised bus services, local authorities can assume responsibility for all elements of the bus network, including routes, timetables and fares. This can lead to improved levels of connectivity. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach to franchising, and Government is engaging with Local Transport Authorities to identify potential alternative models of franchising that could be adopted and used by smaller or more rural authorities.

The Government has also allocated funding to five different areas to take forward bus franchising pilots. The pilots will test different franchising models to investigate how they can be implemented and deliver improved bus services for passengers, including in more rural locations. The pilots will provide funding, guidance, and practical resources to local transport authorities to identify the most suitable approach to bus franchising and wider bus reform measures.

Armed Forces: Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme)
Tuesday 18th November 2025

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether there are plans to build new service family accommodation in the constituency of Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme.

Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)

The Defence Housing Strategy sets out a vision for the future renewal of the Service family estate, backed by a 10-year programme of investment. Until the Strategy implementation plan is finalised, we are unable to confirm any future plans for new Service Family Accommodation in your constituency of Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme.




Lee Pitcher - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 19th November 2025 2:30 p.m.
Procedure Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Elections within the House of Commons
At 2:45pm: Oral evidence
Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m.
Procedure Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons
At 2:45pm: Oral evidence
The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General
At 3:30pm: Oral evidence
Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m.
Procedure Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Work of the Leader of the House
At 10:15am: Oral evidence
Sir Alan Campbell, Leader of the House of Commons
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve KC, Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Ellis KBE, KC, and Sir Jeremy Wright

Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee
Friday 14th November 2025
Written Evidence - The Electoral Commission
EHC0023 - Elections within the House of Commons

Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators

Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions
Procedure Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication.

Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform.