Information between 8th November 2025 - 18th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Cabinet Office
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (49 words) Monday 17th November 2025 - Written Corrections Cabinet Office |
|
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Rogue Builders
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (82 words) Thursday 13th November 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Business and Trade |
|
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Nolan Principles
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (46 words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Bus Services: Franchises
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of bus franchising on community connectivity in rural villages. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government is committed to delivering better bus services, including in rural areas. We have set out a plan to achieve this based on giving local leaders the powers they need and empowering them to choose the service model that works best in their area, whether that be franchising, strengthened Enhanced Partnerships, or local authority bus companies.
Under franchised bus services, local authorities can assume responsibility for all elements of the bus network, including routes, timetables and fares. This can lead to improved levels of connectivity. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach to franchising, and Government is engaging with Local Transport Authorities to identify potential alternative models of franchising that could be adopted and used by smaller or more rural authorities.
The Government has also allocated funding to five different areas to take forward bus franchising pilots. The pilots will test different franchising models to investigate how they can be implemented and deliver improved bus services for passengers, including in more rural locations. The pilots will provide funding, guidance, and practical resources to local transport authorities to identify the most suitable approach to bus franchising and wider bus reform measures. |
|
Armed Forces: Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether there are plans to build new service family accommodation in the constituency of Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Defence Housing Strategy sets out a vision for the future renewal of the Service family estate, backed by a 10-year programme of investment. Until the Strategy implementation plan is finalised, we are unable to confirm any future plans for new Service Family Accommodation in your constituency of Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Elections within the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Leader of the House At 10:15am: Oral evidence Sir Alan Campbell, Leader of the House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve KC, Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Ellis KBE, KC, and Sir Jeremy Wright Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee |
|
Friday 14th November 2025
Written Evidence - The Electoral Commission EHC0023 - Elections within the House of Commons Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions Procedure Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication. Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform. |