Debates between Kim Leadbeater and Jake Richards during the 2024 Parliament

Tue 28th Jan 2025
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Second sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee stage: 2nd sitting & Committee stage: 2nd sitting

Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Second sitting)

Debate between Kim Leadbeater and Jake Richards
Kim Leadbeater Portrait Kim Leadbeater
- Hansard - -

Q On the point about reporting, where patients take that right to refuse treatment, capacity must be assessed at that point if a patient has said, “Look, I don’t want any more treatment.” That is quite an important point to assess capacity. Are those cases logged and recorded?

Mark Swindells: Yes. It would be important for the patient’s records to cover the points of consent and that the doctor has recorded that they have interacted with the patient that way. I do not believe it is centrally held or collated in any sense like that, but I may be wrong.

Jake Richards Portrait Jake Richards
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Q Dr Green, on subsections (4) and (5) of clause 4 and the information services, as opposed to the referral to a practitioner, I think your point has some weight. In terms of the rest of clause 4 as drafted, it has an opt-in, it gives wide discretion to practitioners and there is no obligation to raise it, so from my understanding of your written evidence, it ticks all the boxes. Is that fair?

Dr Green: Yes, with the exception of the referral.