Information between 6th September 2025 - 16th September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 364 |
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 300 |
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 297 |
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 87 |
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 300 |
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 179 |
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 116 Noes - 333 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 325 Noes - 171 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 404 Noes - 98 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 160 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 96 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 158 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 402 Noes - 97 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Kim Leadbeater voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 398 Noes - 93 |
Written Answers |
---|
IVF: Finance
Asked by: Kim Leadbeater (Labour - Spen Valley) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to ensure the level of IVF funding is adjusted in line with inflation; and with reference to NICE's guidelines entitled Fertility problems: assessment and treatment, updated on 6 September 2017, what steps he is taking to ensure that local provision allows patients to access more than a single NHS-funded IVF cycle. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) We expect integrated care boards (ICBs) to commission fertility services in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, ensuring equal access to fertility treatment across England. NICE is currently reviewing the fertility guidelines and will consider whether the current recommendations for access to National Health Service-funded treatment are still appropriate. A consultation on revised guidelines was published on 10 September 2025. The Government recognises that fertility treatment across the NHS in England is subject to variation in access. Work continues between the Department and NHS England to improve NHS-funded fertility services. In light of broader pressures on the NHS and ongoing changes within NHS England, we are considering achievable ambitions to improve access to fertility services and fairness for all affected couples. |
Small Businesses: Pensions
Asked by: Kim Leadbeater (Labour - Spen Valley) Friday 12th September 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of (a) regulatory oversight and (b) consumer protection for Small Self-Administered Schemes (SSAS); and if she will take steps to (i) improve regulatory oversight of SSAS trustees and (ii) ensure that people who have suffered losses relating to SSAS are able to access compensation. Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury) DWP officials work closely with The Pensions Regulator (TPR) to ensure people’s pension savings are protected and that the regulatory regime remains fit for purpose in a changing pensions landscape. A Small Self-Administered Scheme (SSAS) is an occupational pension scheme typically set up by the directors of a business (often a small or family-run business) who want more control over the investment decisions relating to their pension and often the ability to invest in employer-related assets. The Pensions Regulator regulates those SSAS which are required to register with it (only occupational pension schemes with two or more members must register with TPR). A SSAS with only one member would be exempt and is unlikely to be registered with TPR. In addition, SSASs are excepted from many pensions regulatory requirements because all the members of these schemes, through being trustees, are responsible for the decisions made. SSASs are therefore not usually eligible for Government compensation arrangements. Unfortunately, in a few cases SSAS appear to have been misused as a means of avoiding the regulatory regime which helps ensure that members’ pensions are secure. Individuals have been encouraged to use a SSAS inappropriately. Any member who has suffered a loss in connection with a SSAS should contact the Pensions Ombudsman in the first instance.
|
Sleeping Rough
Asked by: Kim Leadbeater (Labour - Spen Valley) Thursday 11th September 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department is taking to support local authorities in addressing unauthorised encampments that negatively affect local (a) high streets or (b) businesses. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) Local authorities and police have a range of powers to manage unauthorised encampments, including those affecting high streets and businesses. These include long-standing provisions under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, and additional powers introduced through the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022. The response to any unauthorised encampments is locally led, involving multi-agency collaboration between councils, police and other services, ensuring actions are tailored to local needs. Statutory guidance issued by the Home Office sets out how these powers should be applied, including the importance of considering welfare needs and ensuring enforcement is lawful, necessary and proportionate. The 2022 Act also introduced a criminal offence for residing on land without consent in or with a vehicle and causing significant damage, disruption or distress. Penalties include up to three months’ imprisonment, a fine of up to £2,500, and/or vehicle seizure. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
188 speeches (55,560 words) 2nd reading Friday 12th September 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Kamall (Con - Life peer) shared with each other; we also saw it in Committee in the other place, where the Bill’s sponsor, Kim Leadbeater - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Featherstone (LD - Life peer) people peace of mind and reduces traumatic situations for families and healthcare workers.I thank Kim Leadbeater - Link to Speech 3: Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (LD - Life peer) whether they were in support of the Bill or against it.I want to thank the MP for Spen Valley, Kim Leadbeater - Link to Speech 4: Lord Dubs (Lab - Life peer) forward, I fully respect the sincerity with which they have been put forward.I pay tribute to Kim Leadbeater - Link to Speech 5: Baroness Debbonaire (Lab - Life peer) is the intention of my noble and learned friend Lord Falconer, or of my friend, the much-loved Kim Leadbeater - Link to Speech |
Bill Documents |
---|
Sep. 11 2025
12th Report of the Constitution Committee Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26 Select Committee report Found: Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is a private members’ bill introduced in the House of Commons by Kim Leadbeater |