All 1 Debates between Kim Leadbeater and Alicia Kearns

Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Debate between Kim Leadbeater and Alicia Kearns
Kim Leadbeater Portrait Kim Leadbeater
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman has made the point for me: within a robust system, we will check for coercion, but we do not have any of that now. At the moment, the person will be definitely be dead. We have to look at the status quo. Putting in layers of safeguarding and checking for coercion must be better than the system that we have now.

Alicia Kearns Portrait Alicia Kearns (Rutland and Stamford) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Colleagues are right to raise questions around coercion. I hosted a phone-in on LBC where people rang in and said, “I feel like I have to end my life because I recognise how difficult it is for my family to see me suffering.” The limit in the Bill, however, is that someone must have only six months to live according to two doctors and a judge, which I genuinely believe massively reduces the risk of coercion. Are we really saying that people are so desperate to bump off their families that if they were told that they had six months to live, they would escalate the process and do it sooner?

Kim Leadbeater Portrait Kim Leadbeater
- Hansard - -

The hon. Lady makes an excellent point—she is absolutely right. The very strict criteria in the Bill add extra layers of safeguarding, which, again, we just do not have at the moment.